| 固定污染源可凝结颗粒物测量方法 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 蒋靖坤,邓建国,王刚,张莹,李妍菁,段雷,郝吉明.固定污染源可凝结颗粒物测量方法[J].环境科学,2019,40(12):5234-5239. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 蒋靖坤 邓建国 王刚 张莹 李妍菁 段雷 郝吉明 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084;国家环境保护大气复合污染来源与控制重点实验室, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084;国家环境保护大气复合污染来源与控制重点实验室, 北京 100084,清华大学环境学院, 北京 100084;国家环境保护大气复合污染来源与控制重点实验室, 北京 100084 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC0213202） |
| |
| 摘 要： | 随着燃煤电厂以及钢铁等非电行业超低排放改造的进行,固定污染源可过滤颗粒物(FPM)排放浓度逐渐降低,可凝结颗粒物(CPM)的排放逐步引起关注.然而目前对CPM的认识不足,尚没有国际统一的标准测量方法.本研究分析了可用于固定源CPM测量的3种方法,包括冷凝法、稀释间接法和稀释直接法,并在燃煤电厂、钢铁焦化厂和钢铁烧结厂等固定源进行了CPM现场测量.结果表明,8个电厂和钢铁厂冷凝法测得的CPM质量浓度均显著高于稀释间接法和稀释直接法测量结果.冷凝法测得的CPM中含有大量的SO_24-、Cl-等水溶性离子,其浓度显著高于稀释间接法和稀释直接法测量结果.稀释直接法测量的CPM浓度相对较低.冷凝法测量过程中由于水蒸气过饱和冷凝成水吸收SO_2和HCl等易溶于水的气体,进而显著高估了CPM实际排放浓度.稀释间接法能模拟实际大气环境中CPM的形成过程,且不存在冷凝水吸收等问题.
|
| 关 键 词： | 固定源 可凝结颗粒物(CPM) 稀释法 冷凝法 细颗粒物(PM2.5) |
| 收稿时间： | 2019/6/19 0:00:00 |
| 修稿时间： | 2019/7/5 0:00:00 |
Measuring the Condensable Particle Matter from a Stationary Source |
| |
| JIANG Jing-kun,DENG Jian-guo,WANG Gang,ZHANG Ying,LI Yan-jing,DUAN Lei and HAO Ji-ming.Measuring the Condensable Particle Matter from a Stationary Source[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2019,40(12):5234-5239. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Jing-kun DENG Jian-guo WANG Gang ZHANG Ying LI Yan-jing DUAN Lei and HAO Ji-ming |
| |
| Institution: | School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China,School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China,School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China and School of Environment, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Sources and Control of Air Pollution Complex, Beijing 100084, China |
| |
| Abstract: | With the retrofitting of coal-fired power plants and steel plants for ultra-low-emission control, the concentration of filterable particles (FPM) from these sources is decreasing gradually. The condensable particle matter (CPM) draws more attention. The understanding of CPM emission concentration and chemical characteristics is still limited. There has been no standard determination method of CPM in China until now. In this study, three methods, including the dry impinger method (US EPA method 202), indirect dilution method, and direct dilution method, are discussed and compared in measuring CPM emissions from coal-fired power plants, coke-making plants and sintering plants. The results show that method 202 overestimates the emissions of CPM, due to the fact that the gaseous HCl or SO2 dissolves into condensable liquid and cannot be completely eliminated by N2 purging after sampling. Instead, CPM measured using the indirect dilution method better represents its real emission levels into the atmosphere. |
| |
| Keywords: | stationary source condensable particle matter (CPM) dilution method dry impinger method PM2 5 |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录！ |
| 点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息 |
| 点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文 |
|
