首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

2017年秋季长春市PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染来源及健康风险评价
引用本文:张艺璇,曹芳,郑涵,张东东,翟晓瑶,范美益,章炎麟.2017年秋季长春市PM2.5中多环芳烃的污染来源及健康风险评价[J].环境科学,2020,41(2):564-573.
作者姓名:张艺璇  曹芳  郑涵  张东东  翟晓瑶  范美益  章炎麟
作者单位:南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044,南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,气候与环境变化国际合作联合实验室大气环境中心,南京 210044;南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心,气象灾害教育部重点实验室,南京 210044
基金项目:江苏省自然科学杰出青年基金项目;国家重点研发计划项目;国家自然科学基金项目
摘    要:本研究采集了长春市2017年秋季大气中的PM2.5样品共30个,采用气相色谱质谱仪(GC-MS)分析了样品中17种多环芳烃(polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons,PAHs)的浓度和组成特征,运用比值法和主成分分析法确定PAHs的污染来源,并通过计算苯并(a)芘等效致癌浓度和终身致癌超额危险度进行健康风险评估.结果表明,长春市秋季PM2.5平均质量浓度为(50.84±12.23)μg·m-3,有机碳(OC)和元素碳(EC)含量分别为(17.07±5.64)μg·m-3和(1.33±0.75)μg·m-3,占PM2.5总量的37%;PAHs总浓度为(15.69±5.93)ng·m-3,以中高环数的PAHs为主,占总PAHs的84.26%;长春市秋季大气中PAHs主要来源于机动车尾气排放(44.48%) > 煤燃烧(29.16%) > 生物质燃烧(26.36%),本地交通(汽油车)排放是主要污染源;苯并(a)芘等效致癌平均浓度在1.55~5.38 ng·m-3之间,总致癌等效平均浓度为(6.44±1.53)ng·m-3,总体处于轻微污染水平;通过呼吸摄入PAHs对成年女性健康危害最大,其次是成年男性和儿童,但所有人群的终身致癌风险值均未超过1×10-6,其健康风险处于可接受水平.

关 键 词:长春市  PM2.5  多环芳烃  来源解析  健康风险
收稿时间:2019/6/5 0:00:00
修稿时间:2019/9/16 0:00:00

Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in PM2.5 in Changchun City, Autumn of 2017
ZHANG Yi-xuan,CAO Fang,ZHENG Han,ZHANG Dong-dong,ZHAI Xiao-yao,FAN Mei-yi and ZHANG Yan-lin.Source Apportionment and Health Risk Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in PM2.5 in Changchun City, Autumn of 2017[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Science,2020,41(2):564-573.
Authors:ZHANG Yi-xuan  CAO Fang  ZHENG Han  ZHANG Dong-dong  ZHAI Xiao-yao  FAN Mei-yi and ZHANG Yan-lin
Institution:Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China,Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China and Yale-NUIST Center on Atmospheric Environment, International Joint Laboratory on Climate and Environment Change(ILCEC), School of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China;Key Laboratory of Meteorological Disaster, Ministry of Education(KLME), Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters(CIC-FEMD), Nanjing University of Information Science&Technology, Nanjing 210044, China
Abstract:
Keywords:Changchun  PM2  5  polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons  source analysis  health risks
本文献已被 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《环境科学》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《环境科学》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号