首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


The soul of the machine: continual improvement in ISO 14001
Institution:1. ETIS/ENSEA – Université Cergy-Pontoise, CNRS, UMR 8051, 6 avenue du Ponceau, CS 20707 CERGY, F 95014 Cergy-Pontoise Cedex, France;2. INRIA Rennes Bretagne Atlantique, Campus de Beaulieu, 35042 Rennes Cedex, France;1. Key Laboratory of Dependable Service Computing in Cyber Physical Society (Chongqing University), Ministry of Education, China;2. College of Computer Science, Chongqing University, Chongqing, China;3. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Macau, China;1. Malaysia-Japan International Institute of Technology (MJIIT), Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;2. Department of Social Sciences, Oxford Brookes University, Oxford, United Kingdom;3. UTM Palm Oil Research Center, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia;4. Anglia Ruskin University, Global Sustainability Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom;1. CINSO (Solid State Research Dept.) CITEDEF, UNIDEF (MINDEF-CONICET), Juan B. de La Salle 4397, Villa Martelli, B1603 ALO Buenos Aires, Argentina;2. Microelectronics, Thin Films Laboratory – CITEDEF, Juan B. de La Salle 4397, Villa Martelli, B1603 ALO Buenos Aires, Argentina
Abstract:Continual improvement is a key component of ISO 14001, but in contrast to most other specifications in the standard, it is difficult to assess. Based on interviews with 19 certified companies in the chemical, food, and environmental services sectors, this article explores the dynamics of continual improvement. While most auditing practices focus on the operational level of improvement, the system level is more important in realizing continual improvement. Taking continual improvement as an explicit principle, defining long-term objectives, and widening the scope of environmental policy objectives can be used as indicators for system level improvement. Front-runners in continual improvement tend to use more management indicators and think more favourably on benchmarking. They are relatively stronger motivated by internal policy ambitions, and parent company aims than by pressures from outside. Further elaboration of performance frameworks for continual improvement is needed, taking into account the way performance indicators can stimulate internal motivational, and policy processes.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号