首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

农村地区清洁取暖工作绿色低碳绩效评价及对策建议——基于石家庄市深泽县和无极县农户调查
引用本文:赵梦雪,冯相昭,王敏,杜晓林,梁启迪,王鹏.农村地区清洁取暖工作绿色低碳绩效评价及对策建议——基于石家庄市深泽县和无极县农户调查[J].环境与可持续发展,2020,45(2):116-122.
作者姓名:赵梦雪  冯相昭  王敏  杜晓林  梁启迪  王鹏
作者单位:生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029,生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029,生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029,生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029,生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029,生态环境部环境与经济政策研究中心,北京 100029
基金项目:重点区域农村清洁取暖协同效应评价案例研究项目
摘    要:清洁取暖政策实施效果体现在多个方面。本文基于农户调查结果,从经济、社会、污染减排和温室气体减排4个维度,构建"煤改气""煤改电"绿色低碳绩效评价指标体系,并采用协同控制效应坐标系分析和减排效果归一化分析,量化协同减排效益。结果表明:两种改造路径均取得了显著的污染物和温室气体减排效益;用气取暖的协同减排能力高于用电取暖,同时社会满意度水平略高,运行过程中政府补贴力度更大;无极县通过全面推广空气源热泵设备,显著降低了用电取暖的经济运行成本;总体来说,两县用电取暖得分更高。由此建议,地方要创新设备推广机制,加强群众宣传力度,制定合理补贴政策,以保障清洁取暖工作的持续有效开展。

关 键 词:清洁取暖  农村地区  绩效评价  绿色低碳  问卷调查

Green and low-carbon performance evaluation of clean heating program in rural areas and countermeasures:based on the household survey of Shenze and Wuji Counties of ShiJiazhuang
ZHAO Mengxue,FENG Xiangzhao,WANG Min,DU Xiaolin,LIANG Qidi,WANG Peng.Green and low-carbon performance evaluation of clean heating program in rural areas and countermeasures:based on the household survey of Shenze and Wuji Counties of ShiJiazhuang[J].Environment and Sustainable Development,2020,45(2):116-122.
Authors:ZHAO Mengxue  FENG Xiangzhao  WANG Min  DU Xiaolin  LIANG Qidi  WANG Peng
Institution:(Policy Research Center for Environment and Economy,Ministry of Ecology and Environment,Beijing 100029,China)
Abstract:The effects of Clean Heating Program is reflected in many aspects. Based on the survey results, the paper constructed a Green and Low-Carbon Performance Evaluation index system of four dimensions, such as economic, social,pollution emission reduction and greenhouse gas emission reduction, and by using the method of coordinate analysis of cooperative control effect and normalized analysis of emission reduction effect, the coordinated emission reduction benefits of Clean Heating Program is evaluated. The result shows that, the different transformation paths have achieved significant pollutant and greenhouse gas emission reduction benefits. The collaborative emission reduction capacity of heating with gas is higher than that of electricity, the level of social satisfaction of which is slightly higher, and the government subsidies are more powerful in the operation process. The economic operation cost of electric heating was significantly reduced by widely spreading the air source heat pump equipment in Wuji County. In general, the score of heating with electricity is higher. Visibly, the benefit of Clean Heating Program is obvious. Local governments should innovate the mechanism of equipment promotion, strengthen mass publicity and formulate reasonable subsidy policies to ensure the continuous and effective implementation of Clean Heating Program.
Keywords:Clean Heating Program  rural areas  performance evaluation  green and low-carbon effect  questionnaire survey
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号