首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

不同施肥处理对红壤晚稻田CH_4排放的影响
引用本文:石生伟,李玉娥,秦晓波,万运帆,纪雄辉.不同施肥处理对红壤晚稻田CH_4排放的影响[J].生态与农村环境学报,2010,26(2).
作者姓名:石生伟  李玉娥  秦晓波  万运帆  纪雄辉
作者单位:1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/农业部农业环境与气候变化重点实验室,北京,100081
2. 湖南省土壤肥料研究所,湖南,长沙,410125
基金项目:“十一五”国家科技支撑计划(2006BAD17B01,2007BAC03A03)
摘    要:选取不同施肥处理的双季稻田为研究对象,采用静态箱-气相色谱法对晚稻田CH4排放通量进行观测。结果表明,与不施肥对照(T1)相比,各施肥处理CH4排放通量均有不同程度增加。其中秸秆还田+化肥处理(T5)CH4平均排放通量为9.96mg.m-2.h-1,比增氮磷施肥处理(T4)和对照分别增加26.1%和120.0%;平衡施肥处理(T2)和减氮磷施肥处理(T3)CH4平均排放通量比对照增加20%左右。说明施化肥可能提高水稻植株运输能力,进而增加CH4排放,但并未发现施化肥处理(T1、T2、T3和T4)之间CH4排放存在显著差异。同时对相关环境因素的分析表明,各处理CH4排放通量与土壤5cm深处温度间存在指数函数关系,并与田间水层厚度呈正相关关系(P<0.05)。综合考虑温室效应和稻谷产量,认为T2为推荐施肥方式,即N、P2O5和K2O施用量分别为180、90和135kg.hm-2,在插秧前1d施入占总N量70%的碳铵和全部磷肥、钾肥(过磷酸钙和氯化钾)作为基肥,并在分蘖期(2008年7月19日)追施占总N量30%的尿素。

关 键 词:晚稻田  施肥  CH_4  全球增温潜势(GWP)  产量  

CH_4 Emission From Late Rice Field of Red Clay Soil Under Different Fertilization Treatments
SHI Sheng-wei,LI Yu-e,QIN Xiao-bo,WAN Yun-fan,JI Xiong-hui.CH_4 Emission From Late Rice Field of Red Clay Soil Under Different Fertilization Treatments[J].Journal of Ecology and Rural Environment,2010,26(2).
Authors:SHI Sheng-wei  LI Yu-e  QIN Xiao-bo  WAN Yun-fan  JI Xiong-hui
Institution:1.Institute of Agro-Environment and Sustainable Development/a>;Chinese Academy of Agriculture Sciences/The Key Laboratory for Agro-Environment and Climate Change/a>;Ministry of Agriculture/a>;Beijing 100081/a>;China/a>;2.Soil and Fertilizer Institute of Hunan Province/a>;Changsha 410125/a>;China
Abstract:Methane emission fluxes from late rice fields under different fertilization treatments were studied, using the static chamber-gns chromatograph techniques. Results show that compared to Treatment 1 (T1, no fertilization), all the other fertilization treatments increased methane emission. The average methane flux from Treatment 5 (T5, straw incorporation) and Treatment 4 (T4, increased nitrogen and phosphate) was 9. 96 and 7.90 mg·m-2·h~(-1), respectively. Treat ment 2 (T2, balanced fertilization) and Treatment 3 (T3, decreased nitrogen and phosphate) were just approximately 20% more than Treatment 1. In terms of accumulated seasonal methane emission, the treatments followed an decreasing sequence: TS>T4>T2>T3>T1, but no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed between T1, T2, T3 and T4. According to the analysis of related environmental factors, methane emission fluxes had an exponential function relationship with soil temperature at 5 em depth, and had a positive correlation with thickness of the water layer (P<0. 05). T2 was a fertilization model recommended for the local region after comprehensive consideration of the greenhouse effect and rice yield. Considering global warming potentials of CH_4 and rice yield, T2 was a recommended fertilization method under the local condition. Total fertilizer application of N, P2O5 and K2O was 180, 90 and 135 kg· hm~(-2), respectively. Ammonium bicarbonate, with a split 70% of designed N mixed with total P and K_2O (calcium superphesphate and potassium chloride) was broadcasted on the field before transplanting as basal fertilizer, and urea was topdressed with 30% of total N at the fillering stage.
Keywords:late rice field  fertilization  methane  global warming potential  yield  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号