首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Motivations for the use and consumption of wildlife products
Authors:Laura Thomas-Walters  Amy Hinsley  Daniel Bergin  Gayle Burgess  Hunter Doughty  Sara Eppel  Douglas MacFarlane  Wander Meijer  Tien Ming Lee  Jacob Phelps  Robert J Smith  Anita K Y Wan  Diogo Veríssimo
Institution:1. Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology, School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, CT2 7NR U.K.;2. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ U.K.;3. GlobeScan, 1/F, 33–35 Hillier Street, Sheung Wan, Hong Kong;4. TRAFFIC International, David Attenborough Building, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3QZ U.K.;5. Eppel Sustainability, L2-8 Ivy Business Centre Crown Street, Failsworth, Manchester, M35 9BG U.K.;6. Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ U.K.;7. State Key Laboratory of Biological Control and School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-sen University, 135 West Xingang Road, Guangzhou, 510275 China;8. Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ U.K.;9. Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, 11a Mansfield Rd, Oxford, OX1 3SZ U.K.

Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford, 34 Broad St, Oxford, OX1 3BD U.K.

Community Engagement, San Diego Zoo Institute for Conservation Research, 15600 San Pasqual Valley Rd, Escondido, CA, 92027 U.S.A.

Abstract:The dominant approach to combating the illegal wildlife trade has traditionally been to restrict the supply of wildlife products. Yet conservationists increasingly recognize the importance of implementing demand-side interventions that target the end consumers in the trade chain. Their aim is to curb the consumption of wildlife or shift consumption to more sustainable alternatives. However, there are still considerable knowledge gaps in understanding of the diversity of consumer motivations in the context of illegal wildlife trade, which includes hundreds of thousands of species, different uses, and diverse contexts. Based on consultation with multiple experts from a diversity of backgrounds, nationalities, and focal taxa, we developed a typology of common motivations held by wildlife consumers that can be used to inform conservation interventions. We identified 5 main motivational categories for wildlife use: experiential, social, functional, financial, and spiritual, each containing subcategories. This framework is intended to facilitate the segmentation of consumers based on psychographics and allow the tailoring of interventions—whether behavior change campaigns, enforcement efforts, or incentive programs—to the specific context in which they will be used. Underlining the importance of consumer research and collaborating with local actors is an important step toward promoting a more systematic approach to the design of demand reduction interventions.
Keywords:behavior change  conservation social science  consumer research  demand reduction  illegal wildlife trade  cambio en el comportamiento  ciencia social  conservación  estudio de mercado  mercado ilegal de fauna  reducción de demanda  关键词: 保护社会科学  野生动物非法贸易  减少需求  行为改变  消费者研究
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号