首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


A strategy for the next decade to address data deficiency in neglected biodiversity
Authors:Axel Hochkirch  Michael J Samways  Justin Gerlach  Monika Böhm  Paul Williams  Pedro Cardoso  Neil Cumberlidge  P J Stephenson  Mary B Seddon  Viola Clausnitzer  Paulo A V Borges  Gregory M Mueller  Paul Pearce-Kelly  Domitilla C Raimondo  Anja Danielczak  Klaas-Douwe B Dijkstra
Institution:1. Department of Biogeography, Trier University, Trier Centre for Biodiversity Conservation, Trier, D-54286 Germany;2. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

Department of Conservation Ecology and Entomology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7602 South Africa;3. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

Peterhouse, Cambridge, CB2 1RD U.K.;4. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

Institute of Zoology, Zoological Society of London, Regent's Park, London, NW1 4RY U.K.;5. Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD U.K.;6. IUCN SSC Species Monitoring Specialist Group, c/o IUCN, Gland, 1196 Switzerland

Laboratory for Integrative Biodiversity Research (LIBRe), Finnish Museum of Natural History (LUOMUS), University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00100 Finland

CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, 9700-042 Portugal;7. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

Department of Biology, Northern Michigan University, Marquette, MI, 49855 U.S.A.;8. IUCN SSC Species Monitoring Specialist Group, c/o IUCN, Gland, 1196 Switzerland;9. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

IUCN SSC Mollusc Specialist Group, Exbourne, Okehampton, EX20 3RD U.K.;10. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

Senckenberg Research Institute, Görlitz, 02826 Germany;11. Department of Biogeography, IUCN SSC Invertebrate Conservation Committee, c/o Trier University, Trier, D-54286 Germany

IUCN SSC Species Monitoring Specialist Group, c/o IUCN, Gland, 1196 Switzerland

CE3C – Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes/Azorean Biodiversity Group and Universidade dos Açores, Angra do Heroísmo, 9700-042 Portugal;12. Negaunee Institute for Plant Conservation and Action, Chicago Botanic Garden, Glencoe, IL, 60022 U.S.A.;13. Zoological Society of London, London, NW1 4RY U.K.;14. South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria, 0001 South Africa;15. Naturalis Biodiversity Center, Leiden, 2332 AA The Netherlands

Abstract:Measuring progress toward international biodiversity targets requires robust information on the conservation status of species, which the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List of Threatened Species provides. However, data and capacity are lacking for most hyperdiverse groups, such as invertebrates, plants, and fungi, particularly in megadiverse or high-endemism regions. Conservation policies and biodiversity strategies aimed at halting biodiversity loss by 2020 need to be adapted to tackle these information shortfalls after 2020. We devised an 8-point strategy to close existing data gaps by reviving explorative field research on the distribution, abundance, and ecology of species; linking taxonomic research more closely with conservation; improving global biodiversity databases by making the submission of spatially explicit data mandatory for scientific publications; developing a global spatial database on threats to biodiversity to facilitate IUCN Red List assessments; automating preassessments by integrating distribution data and spatial threat data; building capacity in taxonomy, ecology, and biodiversity monitoring in countries with high species richness or endemism; creating species monitoring programs for lesser-known taxa; and developing sufficient funding mechanisms to reduce reliance on voluntary efforts. Implementing these strategies in the post-2020 biodiversity framework will help to overcome the lack of capacity and data regarding the conservation status of biodiversity. This will require a collaborative effort among scientists, policy makers, and conservation practitioners.
Keywords:Aichi targets  biodiversity  capacity building  conservation status  Convention on Biological Diversity  indicators  IUCN Red List  monitoring  biodiversidad  Convenio sobre la Diversidad Biológica  desarrollo de capacidad  estado de conservación  indicadores  Lista Roja UICN  monitoreo  objetivos de Aichi  《IUCN 红色名录》  《生物多样性公约》  爱知目标  保护状况  生物多样性  指标  监测  能力建设
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号