首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Conserving alpha and beta diversity in wood-production landscapes
Authors:Gavin M Jones  Berry Brosi  Jason M Evans  Isabel G W Gottlieb  Xingwen Loy  Mauricio M Núñez-Regueiro  Holly K Ober  Elizabeth Pienaar  Rajeev Pillay  Kathryn Pisarello  Lora L Smith  Robert J Fletcher Jr
Institution:1. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA;2. Department of Environmental Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Current Address: Berry Brosi, Department of Biology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA;3. Department of Environmental Science and Studies, Stetson University, DeLand, Florida, USA;4. Department of Environmental Science, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Current address: Xingwen Loy, Conservation & Research Department, Atlanta Botanical Garden, Atlanta, Georgia, USA;5. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA;6. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA

Current address: Kathryn Pisarello, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Southeast Watershed Research Laboratory, Tifton, Georgia, USA;7. Jones Center at Ichauway, Newton, Georgia, USA

Abstract:International demand for wood and other forest products continues to grow rapidly, and uncertainties remain about how animal communities will respond to intensifying resource extraction associated with woody bioenergy production. We examined changes in alpha and beta diversity of bats, bees, birds, and reptiles across wood production landscapes in the southeastern United States, a biodiversity hotspot that is one of the principal sources of woody biomass globally. We sampled across a spatial gradient of paired forest land-uses (representing pre and postharvest) that allowed us to evaluate biological community changes resulting from several types of biomass harvest. Short-rotation practices and residue removal following clearcuts were associated with reduced alpha diversity (−14.1 and −13.9 species, respectively) and lower beta diversity (i.e., Jaccard dissimilarity) between land-use pairs (0.46 and 0.50, respectively), whereas midrotation thinning increased alpha (+3.5 species) and beta diversity (0.59). Over the course of a stand rotation in a single location, biomass harvesting generally led to less biodiversity. Cross-taxa responses to resource extraction were poorly predicted by alpha diversity: correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were highly variable (−0.2 to 0.4) with large uncertainties. In contrast, beta diversity patterns were highly consistent and predictable across taxa, where correlations in responses between taxonomic groups were all positive (0.05–0.4) with more narrow uncertainties. Beta diversity may, therefore, be a more reliable and information-rich indicator than alpha diversity in understanding animal community response to landscape change. Patterns in beta diversity were primarily driven by turnover instead of species loss or gain, indicating that wood extraction generates habitats that support different biological communities.
Keywords:alternative energy  biodiversity  bioenergy  biomass  community  multispecies  occupancy modeling  resource extraction  biodiversidad  bioenergía  biomasa  comunidad  energía alternativa  extracción de recursos  modelado de ocupación  multiespecie  关键词  替代能源  生物多样性  生物能源  生物质  群落  多物种  占域模型  资源开采
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号