首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Standard purity and response factors of perfluorinated compounds
Authors:Jonathan E Naile  Jong Seong Khim  Jessica N House  Paul D Jones  John P Giesy
Institution:1. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre , University of Saskatchewan , 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada jonathan.naile@usask.ca;3. Division of Environmental Science and Ecological Engineering, Korea University , Seoul 136-713, South Korea;4. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre , University of Saskatchewan , 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;5. Department of Veterinary Biomedical Sciences and Toxicology Centre , University of Saskatchewan , 44 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, Canada;6. Department of Biology and Chemistry , Center for Coastal Pollution and Conservation, City University of Hong Kong, Tat Chee Avenue , Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, Peoples Republic of China;7. Department of Zoology , Center for Integrative Toxicology, Michigan State University , E. Lansing, MI, USA
Abstract:It has been reported that the relative response factors of isotopically labeled standards and unlabeled standards of the same perfluorinated compounds could be different. Individual (100 ng mL?1) solutions of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS) were analyzed using high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass-spectrometry under negative-ion electrospray to detect any impurities present down to 0.5%–0.1% relative to the major component. Purity of the standards ranged from approximately 86% to ≥ 97%. Standard solutions of unlabeled and isotopically labeled materials were analyzed to compare the response factors of isotopically labeled analytes versus their nonlabeled counterparts in three different matrices at equivalent concentrations: organic solvent (methanol), serum extract, and water present individually and concurrently. Not all labeled analytes have the same response factor as their nonlabeled complement, and in at least one case the matrix in which the standard is present may cause significant suppression of response. Standard solutions of electrochemical fluorination produced PFOA and PFOS were quantified under multiple reaction monitoring mode, using calibration curves prepared from standards consisting primarily of linear standards only. The use of linear only standards may cause under-prediction of concentrations, and that the working range of these standards may be limited.
Keywords:calibration  PFCs  PFOS  PFOA  LC-MS/MS
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号