Environmental and social factors influence chorusing behaviour in a tropical frog: examining various temporal and spatial scales |
| |
Authors: | P N Brooke R A Alford L Schwarzkopf |
| |
Institution: | (1) School of Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia e-mail: lin.schwarzkopf@jcu.edu.au Fax: +61-747-251570, AU;(2) Rainforest Cooperative Research Centre, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia, AU |
| |
Abstract: | Many animals use conspicuous display to attract mates, and there should be selection for displays to occur at times and places
that maximise the probability of mating, while minimising energetic costs and predator attraction. To select the best times
for display, individuals may use environmental cues, the presence of other individuals, or both, but few studies have examined
these sources of variation in display activity. In this study, we examined physical environmental and social factors triggering
displays in a tropical, terrestrially breeding frog, Cophixalus ornatus. To measure the influence of physical environmental conditions on calling activity, we recorded temperature, rainfall, moon
illumination/visibility, humidity, barometric pressure and intensity of calling activity throughout a breeding season at six
locations along a 560-m transect. The intensity of calling varied daily, seasonally, and at a small spatial scale. Variation
in calling activity from day to day was large. There was also a strong seasonal trend in calling activity: few males called
at the start of the season, activity peaked shortly after the beginning of the season, and then declined linearly from the
peak to the end of the season. There was also consistent variation among sites along the transect, which may have been due
to variations in frog density at each site, or to consistent microscale variations in physical conditions, or both. After
statistically removing consistent local variation among sites, a principal components analysis suggested that a maximum of
35.8% of the variation in calling activity among days was due to factors common to all sites, such as weather, moon illumination,
or large-scale social facilitation (e.g. of choruses by other choruses). The remainder of the variation among sites (64.2%)
was due to site-specific factors, such as small-scale social facilitation or unmeasured, apparently stochastic effects, such
as microenvironmental physical factors that do not vary consistently over sites. Regressions of environmental variables on
residual calling activity (after removing consistent effects of site and season), alone or in combination, accounted for very
little of the variation in the number of calling males (maximum 10%). Thus, our data, showing strong seasonal effects and
consistent variation among sites combined with large amounts of variation in the number of calling males at small spatial
scales, suggest that environmental conditions, such as temperature, rainfall, moon illumination and barometric pressure, which
act over large spatial scales, may determine the overall environmental envelope within which calling can occur but do not
account for most of the variation in the number of calling males on a day-to-day or site-to-site basis. Similarly, variations
in the number of calling males at small spatial scales suggest that social facilitation is a relatively unimportant trigger
for displays on a large scale in these frogs. On the other hand, our data suggest that social facilitation may have important
effects on variation in the number of calling males on a day-to-day and site-to-site basis. We used playback experiments to
assess whether the sound of calling could initiate displays. We played either a taped chorus or white noise in areas where
few (zero to two) males were calling. The number of calling males increased both during and after the chorus stimulus, whereas
there was no increase in calling in response to white noise. These data suggest that examining variation in calling activity
at small spatial scales can reveal the sources of variation for the number of calling males, and indicate that, in these frogs,
males tend to use the calling of other individuals as a cue to determine when to display.
Received: 19 October 1999 / Revised: 30 June 2000 / Accepted: 26 August 2000 |
| |
Keywords: | Cophixalus ornatus Group displays Playbacks Microhylid frog |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|