A comparison of macrofaunal and meiofaunal distribution and standing stock across a rocky shore,with an estimate of their productivities

In 1984 and 1985 algal, macrofaunal and meiofaunal standing stocks were estimated on a exposed rocky shore along the west coast of False Bay, South Africa, using comparable, area-based sampling techniques. The shore supported a rich growth of algae, particularly in summer, when a maximum standing crop of 403 g m^-2 was recorded in the low shore. In winter, the largest component of macrofaunal biomass comprised the filter-feeding barnacle Tetraclita serrata, which attained 75 g m^-2 in the middle balanoid; but as a result of late recruitment and high mortality of this species, the summer shore was dominated by herbivorous gastropods, particularly Patella cochlear, which attained a maximum biomass of 66 g m^-2 on the low shore. Meiofaunal numbers and biomass were closely correlated to the distribution of algal turfs and associated trapped sediments. Numerically, the most important components of the meiofauna were nematodes and copepods, while the biomass was more evenly shared among foraminifera, minute gastropods, copepods and insect larvae. Numbers and biomass peaked in the lower balanoid during winter (1.9×10⁶ individuals, or 8.5 g m^-2). Macrofauna:meiofauna numbers and biomass ratios are presented for each zone and the distribution patterns discussed in relation to the conditons in each. Numerically, meiofauna exceed macrofauna by an overall ratio of 1:391, with values ranging from 1:556 in the lower balanoid to 1:18 in the Littorina zone. Macrofaunal biomass exceeds that of meiofauna in all zones by an overall ratio of 10:1, but values range from 2.1:1 in the upper balanoid to 48:1 in the middle balanoid. By incorporating turnover ratios extrapolated from the literature, mean annual productivity ratios have been calculated. These indicate that macrofauna account for 75% of total secondary production and meiofauna for 25%. Failure to incorporate meiofauna in analyses of energy flow on rocky shore ecosystems would thus lead to considerable errors. The possible trophic role of meiofauna in such systems is discussed.