首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Economics of additionality for environmental services from agriculture
Authors:John K Horowitz  Richard E Just
Institution:1. Office of Tax Policy, U.S. Department of the Treasury, Washington, DC 20024, USA;2. Distinguished University Professor, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742, USA
Abstract:We present a model of additionality for offsets sold from agriculture to industrial sector sources regulated by cap-and-trade. We consider a potential policy where agricultural sources would not be covered by cap-and-trade requirements but would be eligible to receive offsets whenever their emissions fall below a policy-specified baseline, and would not be penalized for emissions above their baseline. Major results are: (1) The optimal baseline should be set above the average counterfactual emissions of participating farms, an unexpected result that has been missing from the literature. (2) The optimal trading ratio should be greater than one (a ton of offsets counts for less than a ton of covered emissions) even under emissions certainty. Previous research has justified such trading ratios by emissions uncertainty. (3) Emissions uncertainty does not justify a change in the baseline if the accompanying emissions model is unbiased. (4) An optimal combination of policies is to subsidize offsets and tighten the baseline relative to the no-subsidy case.
Keywords:Additionality  Cap-and-trade  Offsets  Environmental regulation  Trading ratio
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号