首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Residual veterinary antibiotics in pig excreta after oral administration of sulfonamides
Authors:Jinrong?Qiu  Tao?Zhao  Qingyun?Liu  Jinhua?He  Dechun?He  Genyi?Wu  Yongtao?Li  Chengai?Jiang  Email author" target="_blank">Zhencheng?XuEmail author
Institution:1.South China Institute of Environmental Sciences,Ministry of Environment Protection of PRC,Guangzhou,China;2.College of Resource and Environment,Hunan Agriculture University,Changsha,China;3.College of Resource and Environment,South China Agriculture University,Guangzhou,China;4.Scientific Research Academy of Guangxi Environmental Protection,Nanning,China
Abstract:Sulfonamides (SAs) are applied widely as feed additives in the farming of livestock and poultry. It can lead to the excretion of large amounts of SAs in manure and result in persistent environmental pollution. We evaluated the fate of four SAs, sulfamerazine (SM1), sulfachloropyridazine (SCP), sulfadimoxine (SDM′) and sulfaquinoxaline (SQ), from oral administration to excretion in urine and feces in pigs. The four SAs were added to homemade feed to make them reach the required concentration gradient, which were 0, 50 and 100 mg/kg (low, normal and high concentrations, respectively). In different treatments, excretions of the four SAs were 35.68–86.88 %. With regard to total excretion, the order was SQ > SCP > SM1 > SDM′ for all treatments. The concentration of SAs in the feed had significant effects on the amount of the four SAs excreted every day. The concentration of SAs in feces and in the urine for different treatments was 15.03–26.55 and 14.54–69.22 %, respectively. In each treatment, excretions of SCP, SDM′ and SQ in feces were lower than that in urine. The four SAs remained longer in urine than in feces. Excretions in urine and feces were lower if SAs were administered orally rather than by injection.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号