首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Spatio-Temporal Variability of Soil Respiration of Forest Ecosystems in China: Influencing Factors and Evaluation Model
Authors:Ze-Mei Zheng  Gui-Rui Yu  Xiao-Min Sun  Sheng-Gong Li  Yue-Si Wang  Ying-Hong Wang  Yu-Ling Fu  Qiu-Feng Wang
Institution:(1) Department of Environmental Science and Technology, East China Normal University, North Zhongshan Road 3663, Putuo District, Shanghai, 200062, China;(2) Key Laboratory of Ecosystem Network Observation and Modeling, Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road 11A, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China;(3) Institute of Atmosphere Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 40# Hua Yan Li, Qi Jia Huo Zi, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
Abstract:Understanding the influencing factors of the spatio-temporal variability of soil respiration (R s) across different ecosystems as well as the evaluation model of R s is critical to the accurate prediction of future changes in carbon exchange between ecosystems and the atmosphere. R s data from 50 different forest ecosystems in China were summarized and the influences of environmental variables on the spatio-temporal variability of R s were analyzed. The results showed that both the mean annual air temperature and precipitation were weakly correlated with annual R s, but strongly with soil carbon turnover rate. R s at a reference temperature of 0°C was only significantly and positively correlated with soil organic carbon (SOC) density at a depth of 20 cm. We tested a global-scale R s model which predicted monthly mean R s (R s,monthly) from air temperature and precipitation. Both the original model and the reparameterized model poorly explained the monthly variability of R s and failed to capture the inter-site variability of R s. However, the residual of R s,monthly was strongly correlated with SOC density. Thus, a modified empirical model (TPS model) was proposed, which included SOC density as an additional predictor of R s. The TPS model explained monthly and inter-site variability of R s for 56% and 25%, respectively. Moreover, the simulated annual R s of TPS model was significantly correlated with the measured value. The TPS model driven by three variables easy to be obtained provides a new tool for R s prediction, although a site-specific calibration is needed for using at a different region.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号