首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


Preparation and Implementation of Seven Ecological Compensation Plans for Dutch Highways
Authors:Ruud Cuperus  Marleen Kalsbeek  Helias A Udo De Haes  Kees J Canters
Institution:Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Road and Hydraulic Engineering Division, P.O. Box 5044, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands, NL
Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, Directorate-General of Public Works and Water Management, Oost-Nederland Directorate, P.O. Box 9070, 6800 ED Arnhem, The Netherlands, NL
Leiden University, Centre of Environmental Science, P.O. Box 9518, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands, NL
Delft Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Design & Environment, P.O. Box 5043, 2600 GA Delft, The Netherlands, NL
Abstract:First-generation compensation plans (CPs) for Dutch highway projects have been evaluated with respect to implementation of the compensation principle (1993), which aims to counterbalance the adverse ecological impacts of large-scale development projects. Decision-making on the seven projects took place between 1993 and 1995. Specifically, we considered: (a) the processes employed to prepare and implement the compensation plans; (b) the methods used to identify, plan, and execute the compensation measures; and (c) the results yielded by these methods. We conclude that the CPs were prepared fairly uniformly, particularly in terms of the processes and methodologies used to derive compensation measures. Five of the seven CPs had become operational by 2001 and initial experience is now being gained on land acquisition and transfer of compensation sites to nature conservation trusts. Further progress of CPs is likely to be seriously hampered by growing demand for land for development in general and associated increases in real estate prices. Several problems are addressed and recommendations made with respect to: (a) developing a legal basis for the compensation principle; (b) the relationship with re-allotment projects; (c) estimation of compensation costs; (d) an annual bias of CP budgets to account for rising costs; (e) contingency measures; and (f) criteria for CP (ex-post) evaluation.
Keywords:
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号