Procedure for assessing visual quality for landscape planning and management |
| |
Authors: | H Randal Gimblett John E Fitzgibbon Kevin P Bechard J A Wightman Robert M Itami |
| |
Institution: | (1) College of Architecture and Planning, Ball State University, 47306 Muncie, Indiana, USA;(2) University School of Rural Planning and Development, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;(3) School of Landscape Architecture, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada;(4) School of Landscape Architecture, University of Arizona, 85718 Tucson, Arizona, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Incorporation of aesthetic considerations in the process of landscape planning and development has frequently met with poor results due to its lack of theoretical basis, public involvement, and failure to deal with spatial implications. This problem has been especially evident when dealing with large areas, for example, the Adirondacks, Scenic Highways, and National Forests and Parks. This study made use of public participation to evaluate scenic quality in a portion of the Niagara Escarpment in Southern Ontario, Canada. The results of this study were analyzed using thevisual management model proposed by Brown and Itami (1982) as a means of assessing and evaluating scenic quality. Themap analysis package formulated by Tomlin (1980) was then applied to this assessment for the purpose of spatial mapping of visual impact. The results of this study illustrate that it is possible to assess visual quality for landscape/management, preservation, and protection using a theoretical basis, public participation, and a systematic spatial mapping process. |
| |
Keywords: | Scenic quality Landscape Management Preference policies Resource Value Model Computer Assessment |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|