首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      


How democratic innovations realise democratic goods. Two case studies of area committees in the Netherlands
Authors:Thomas J M Mattijssen  Jelle H Behagel  Arjen E Buijs
Institution:1. Forest and Nature Policy, Wageningen University and Research Centre, PO Box 47, 6700 AA Wageningen, The Netherlands;2. Institute for Science, Innovation and Society, Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands;3. Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Environmental Governance, Utrecht University, PO Box 80.115, 3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands
Abstract:Participatory planning is becoming increasingly integral to governance. Numerous planning innovations are developed which aim to increase democratic legitimacy and improve decision making. This paper critically reflects on a typical Dutch innovation: the area committee. Based on two individual case studies, we investigate whether area committees realise democratic legitimacy in existing planning practices. Analytically, we focus on four democratic goods: inclusiveness, popular control, considered judgement and transparency. Based on the interdependencies between area committees and government structures we discuss the potential and dilemmas for the area committee to contribute to the democratic legitimacy of environmental policy and rural development.
Keywords:governance  participation  regional planning  participatory planning  democracy  legitimacy
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号