首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

金沙江干热河谷几种引进树种人工植被的生态学研究
引用本文:刘方炎,李昆,马姜明.金沙江干热河谷几种引进树种人工植被的生态学研究[J].长江流域资源与环境,2008,17(3):468-468.
作者姓名:刘方炎  李昆  马姜明
作者单位:中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所,国家林业局元谋荒漠生态系统定位研究站,云南,昆明,650224;中国林业科学研究院资源昆虫研究所,国家林业局元谋荒漠生态系统定位研究站,云南,昆明,650224;中国林业科学研究院森林生态环境与保护研究所,北京,100091
基金项目:国家科技支撑计划,国家科技攻关计划,国家科技部公益性课题
摘    要:采用标准木法和收获法,对金沙江元谋干热河谷几种引进树种的人工植被(即赤桉×新银合欢混交林、赤桉纯林、新银合欢纯林和印楝纯林)各层植被生物量与天然次生植被(坡柳-扭黄茅灌草丛)进行了比较研究,同时对各类植被的物种组成和物种多样性进行了比较分析。结果表明:(1)采用引进树种人工恢复的植被积累了大量生物质,总生物量大小依次为:赤桉×新银合欢混交林(4491 t/hm2)>新银合欢纯林(3991 t/hm2)>赤桉纯林(3857 t/ hm2)>印楝纯林(1306 t/hm2)>天然次生林(935 t/ hm2)。人工恢复植被生物量主要集中在乔木层,天然次生植被生物量主要集中在灌木、草本和凋落物层。(2)人工恢复植被的物种数均少于天然次生植被,而且不同植被的物种数和物种组成也存在差异。(3)各植被的Shannon wiener多样性指数和Margalef丰富度指数均表现为:印楝纯林>坡柳-扭黄茅灌草丛>赤桉纯林>赤桉×新银合欢混交林。在Alatato均匀度指数方面,各人工植被之间的差异不大,但人工植被与天然次生植被之间有显著差异。〖

关 键 词:干热河谷  引进树种  植被恢复  物种多样性
文章编号:1004-8227(2008)03-0468-07
修稿时间:2006年12月18

ECOLOGICAL STUDY ON SEVERAL MAN-MADE FORESTS OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN JINSHAJIANG DRY-HOT VALLEY
LIU Fang-yan,LI Kun,MA Jiang-ming.ECOLOGICAL STUDY ON SEVERAL MAN-MADE FORESTS OF INTRODUCED SPECIES IN JINSHAJIANG DRY-HOT VALLEY[J].Resources and Environment in the Yangtza Basin,2008,17(3):468-468.
Authors:LIU Fang-yan  LI Kun  MA Jiang-ming
Abstract:By means of the standard-timber and the harvesting methods,biomass of the vegetation in different layers of some man-made forests of introduced species including Ecucalyptus camaldulensis- Leucaena leucocephala mixed forest,Ecucalyptus camaldulensis pure forest,Leucaena leucocephala pure forest,Azadirachta indica pure forest and natural secondary forest in the dry-hot valley of Jinshajiang Riv- er,Yuanmou County,was comparatively studied.Species composition and plant diversity between man- made forests of introduced species and natural secondary forest have been compared too.The results showed that:(1)Man-made forests of introduced species in comparison with the natural secondary forest have larger biomass,and general biomass in different forests revealed Ecucalyptus camaldulensis-Leucaena leucocephala mixed forest(44.91 t/hm~2)>Leucaena leucocephala pure forest(39.91 t/hm~2)>Ecucalyptus camaldulensis pure forest(38.57 t/hm~2)>Azadirachta indica pure forest(13.06 t/hm~2)>natural second- ary forest(9.35 t/hm~2).Biomass in tree layers took up the most large parts of the man-made forests,and in natural secondary forest,shrub layer,herbaceous layer and litter layer were the main parts.(2)The number of species in man-made forest was fewer than in natural secondary forest,and it was different in the number of species and species composition in man-made forests.(3)The Shannon-wiener diversity indexes and Margalef evenness indexes in forests showed Azadirachta indica pure forest>natural secondary forest>Ecucalyptus camaldulensis pure forest>camaldulensis-Leucaena leucocephala mixed forest>Leucaena leucocephala pure forest.There was no significant difference in Alatato evenness indexes among man-made forests,but it was different between man-made forests and natural secondary forest.
Keywords:dry-hot valley  introduced species  vegetation restoration  species diversity
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《长江流域资源与环境》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号