Combining geodiversity with climate and topography to account for threatened species richness |
| |
| Authors: | Helena Tukiainen Richard Field Katja Kangas Jan Hjort |
| |
| Affiliation: | 1. Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI, FinlandThese authors contributed equally to this article.;2. School of Geography, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, U.K.;3. Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Economics and Society, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI, Finland;4. Geography Research Unit, University of Oulu, Oulu, FI, Finland |
| |
| Abstract: | Understanding threatened species diversity is important for long‐term conservation planning. Geodiversity—the diversity of Earth surface materials, forms, and processes—may be a useful biodiversity surrogate for conservation and have conservation value itself. Geodiversity and species richness relationships have been demonstrated; establishing whether geodiversity relates to threatened species’ diversity and distribution pattern is a logical next step for conservation. We used 4 geodiversity variables (rock‐type and soil‐type richness, geomorphological diversity, and hydrological feature diversity) and 4 climatic and topographic variables to model threatened species diversity across 31 of Finland's national parks. We also analyzed rarity‐weighted richness (a measure of site complementarity) of threatened vascular plants, fungi, bryophytes, and all species combined. Our 1‐km2 resolution data set included 271 threatened species from 16 major taxa. We modeled threatened species richness (raw and rarity weighted) with boosted regression trees. Climatic variables, especially the annual temperature sum above 5 °C, dominated our models, which is consistent with the critical role of temperature in this boreal environment. Geodiversity added significant explanatory power. High geodiversity values were consistently associated with high threatened species richness across taxa. The combined effect of geodiversity variables was even more pronounced in the rarity‐weighted richness analyses (except for fungi) than in those for species richness. Geodiversity measures correlated most strongly with species richness (raw and rarity weighted) of threatened vascular plants and bryophytes and were weakest for molluscs, lichens, and mammals. Although simple measures of topography improve biodiversity modeling, our results suggest that geodiversity data relating to geology, landforms, and hydrology are also worth including. This reinforces recent arguments that conserving nature's stage is an important principle in conservation. |
| |
| Keywords: | biodiversity conserving nature's stage geology geomorphology heterogeneity hydrology biodiversidad conservació n del estado de la naturaleza geologí a geomorfologí a heterogeneidad hidrologí a |
|
|
