共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 78 毫秒
1.
Hugo Fjelsted Alrøe Mette Vaarst Erik Steen Kristensen 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2001,14(3):275-299
The recent development and growth oforganic livestock farming and the relateddevelopment of national and internationalregulations has fueled discussions amongscientists and philosophers concerning theproper conceptualization of animal welfare.These discussions on livestock welfare inorganic farming draw on the conventionaldiscussions and disputes on animal welfare thatinvolve issues such as different definitions ofwelfare (clinical health, absence of suffering,sum of positive and negative experiences,etc.), the possibility for objective measuresof animal welfare, and the acceptable level ofwelfare. It seems clear that livestock welfareis a value-laden concept and that animalwelfare science cannot be made independent ofquestions of values and ethics. The questioninvestigated here is whether those values thatunderpin organic farming, in particular, alsoaffect the interpretation of livestock welfare,and, if so, how. While some of the issuesraised in connection with organic farming arerelatively uncontroversial, others are not. Theintroduction of organic farming values seems tointroduce new criteria for what counts as goodanimal welfare, as well as a different ethicalbasis for making moral decisions on welfare.Organic farming embodies distinctive systemicor communitarian ethical ideas and the organicvalues are connected to a systemic conceptionof nature, of agriculture, of the farm, and ofthe animal. The new criteria of welfare arerelated to concepts such as naturalness,harmony, integrity, and care. While the organicvalues overlap with those involved in theconventional discussion of animal welfare, someof them suggest a need to set new prioritiesand to re-conceptualize animal welfare – forexample, with respect to ``naturalness,' inrelation to the possibilities for expression ofnatural behavior and in relation to animalintegrity as a concept for organismic harmony.The organic perspective also seems to suggest awider range of solutions to welfare problemsthan changes in farm routines or operations onthe animals. The systemic solutions include thechoice and reproduction of suitable breeds,changes in the farm structure, and changes inthe larger production and consumption system – including consumer perceptions andpreferences. But the organic values may alsocall for sacrifices of individual welfare in aconventional sense in order to advance welfarefrom the perspective of organic farming.Whether this is good or bad cannot be decidedwithout entering into an inquiry and discussionof the values and ethics involved. 相似文献
2.
Vonne Lund Sven Hemlin James White 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2004,17(2):157-179
A questionnaire study was performed among Swedish organic livestock farmers to determine their view of animal welfare and other ethical issues in animal production. The questionnaire was sent to 56.5% of the target group and the response rate was 75.6%. A principal components analysis (exploratory factor analysis) was performed to get a more manageable data set. A matrix of intercorrelations between all pairs of factors was computed. The factors were then entered into a series of multiple regression models to explain five dependent variables. Respondents were well educated and had long experience of farming. 81% were full-time farmers. They generally had a very positive attitude towards organic animal husbandry. They considered allowing animals their natural behavior a central aim, which is in accordance with organic philosophy. Farmers tended to be less approving of concepts like animal rights, dignity, and intrinsic value. When analyzing correlations between the factors, two groups of farmers emerged that were only partially correlated, representing different attitudes and behavioral dispositions. These may be interpreted as two subpopulations of organic livestock farmers in Sweden: those who saw organic farming as a lifestyle (``pioneer attitude') and entrepreneurs, who considered making money and new challenges more important. Their view of animal welfare differed. While the pioneers considered natural behavior a key issue, this was less important to the entrepreneurs, who also had a more approving attitude towards invasive operations such as castration and were more critical of the organic standards. 相似文献
3.
Mette Vaarst Lis Alban Lisbeth Mogensen Stig Milan Thamsborg Erik Steen Kristensen 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2001,14(4):367-390
During the past few years,organic dairy farming has grown dramatically inDenmark. Consequently, an increasing number ofpeople are encountering this method ofproduction for the first time. Amongst these,many veterinarians have suddenly had to dealwith organic herds in their home district, and,meeting examples of poor animal welfare, theyhave recently started to express some concerns.Against this background, a so-called``Synthesis of Knowledge' project was initiatedto examine the health and welfare of dairycattle and the use of medication in thetransition to organic production. The aim ofthe project was to investigate associatedproblems from the point of view of the dairyherd. Based on qualitative research interviewswith vets and agricultural advisors, as well asfocus group interviews with farmers who hadrecently converted from conventional to organicfarming, an expert panel attempted to identifyproblem areas and possible solutions. Theproblems related to (a) the adjustment to newand unknown practices, (b) poor management ingeneral, and (c) inappropriate legislation fororganic farming.One problem area was the rearing of dairycalves, particularly with regard to theestablishment of post partumrelationships between cow and calf, grouphousing, and the grazing of young animals. A``natural life' was identified as beingfundamental to organic animal husbandry. Interms of animal welfare, this concept can beunderstood as a way of living in which the calfis allowed to express its natural behavior andsatisfy its natural needs. Essentially, theconditions needed for good calf welfare requirethe compatibility and interplay of elementsfrom ``nature' (the natural life; includingopportunities to satisfy natural needs) and``culture' (farmer management skills; exerciseof care). These elements should be balanced toensure animal welfare in organic herds. 相似文献
4.
Karianne Kalshoven Franck L. B. Meijboom 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2013,26(1):101-117
Sustainability and welfare are concepts that are often mentioned in the context of fishing and fish farming. What these concepts imply in practice, how they are defined and made operational is less clear. This paper focuses on the role of fish buyers as a key actor in the supply chain between the fisher or fish farmer and the consumer. Using semi-structured interviews, we explore and analyze whether and how the interviewed fish buyers define and implement moral values related to animal welfare and sustainability. The eight fish buyers who were interviewed suggest that moral values are used in their work, but also result in a number of value conflicts (moral and non-moral). The focus on sustainability and animal welfare appear to be driven by external and market factors. Sustainability mainly reflects fishing methods and quotas and fish welfare is seen as part of sustainability. Fish welfare seems more important for farmed than for wild fish as the buyers feel a responsibility regarding these kept animals. Further, the decision whether a product is sustainable is mainly based on labels. Fish buyers argue that labels are useful as a business-to-business tool. Nonetheless, based on the interviews, we argue that the relevance of these labels for addressing the ethical dilemmas of buyers is limited. Labels often are a rather procedural solution that deals with the genuine dilemmas only to a limited extent. We conclude that in order to move forward, the sector needs to further reflect and elaborate on its core values. 相似文献
5.
How to Consider the Value of Farm Animals in Breeding Goals. A Review of Current Status and Future Challenges 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
H. M. Nielsen I. Olesen S. Navrud K. Kolstad P. Amer 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2011,24(4):309-330
The objective of this paper is to outline challenges associated with the inclusion of welfare issues in breeding goals for
farm animals and to review the currently available methodologies and discuss their potential advantages and limitations to
address these challenges. The methodology for weighing production traits with respect to cost efficiency and market prices
are well developed and implemented in animal breeding goals. However, these methods are inadequate in terms of assessing proper
values of traits with social and ethical values such as animal welfare, because such values are unlikely to be readily available
from the product prices and costs in the market. Defining breeding goals that take animal welfare and ethical concerns into
account, therefore, requires new approaches. In this paper we suggest a framework and an approach for defining breeding goals,
including animal welfare. The definition of breeding goals including values related to animal welfare requires a multidisciplinary
approach with a combination of different methods such as profit equations, stated preference techniques, and selection index
theory. In addition, a participatory approach involving different stakeholders such as breeding organizations, food authorities,
farmers, and animal welfare organizations should be applied. We conclude that even though these methods provide the necessary
tools for considering welfare issues in the breeding goal, the practical application of these methods is yet to be achieved. 相似文献
6.
The Ethical Contract as a Tool in Organic Animal Husbandry 总被引:1,自引:3,他引:1
Vonne Lund Raymond Anthony Helena Röcklinsberg 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2004,17(1):23-49
This article explores what an ethicfor organic animal husbandry might look like,departing from the assumption that organicfarming is substantially based in ecocentricethics. We argue that farm animals arenecessary functional partners in sustainableagroecosystems. This opens up additional waysto argue for their moral standing. We suggestan ethical contract to be used as acomplementary to the ecocentric framework. Weexpound the content of the contract and end bysuggesting how to apply this contract inpractice. The contract enjoins us to share thewealth created in the agroecosystem (by ourjoint contributions) by enjoining us to carefor the welfare and needs of the individualanimal, and to protect them from exploitation(just as human co-workers should not beexploited). The contract makes promoting goodanimal welfare a necessary condition forbenefiting farm animals. Animals for their partare guaranteed coverage under the contract solong as they continue to contribute to thesystem with products and services. 相似文献
7.
Longevity as an Animal Welfare Issue Applied to the Case of Foot Disorders in Dairy Cattle 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
M. R. N. Bruijnis F. L. B. Meijboom E. N. Stassen 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2013,26(1):191-205
In current dairy farming it is possible to run a profitable farm without having to adapt the system to the needs of dairy cows. In such systems the interests of the farmer and animals often diverge. Consequently, specific animal welfare problems occur. Foot disorders in dairy cattle are an illustrative example resulting from the specific methods of housing and management in current dairy farming. Foot disorders and the resulting lameness are considered the most important welfare problem in dairy farming. However, these foot disorders not only typify welfare problems related to certain housing systems, but they also lead to the premature culling of cows. The assessment of the impact of foot disorders on the welfare of dairy cows raised the question of whether premature culling affects animal welfare since it affects the longevity of a cow. We argue that this aspect of longevity is morally relevant as an animal welfare issue. In this paper we aim to explore whether longevity is both (a) a morally relevant aspect in the discussion on killing animals and (b) a constitutive element of animal welfare. In other words, we aim to explore whether longevity is an independent moral argument in an animal welfare discussion. We claim that longevity is not merely important as an indicator of animal welfare, but is also a constitutive element of animal welfare. We argue that we need a more integrated approach to animal welfare and that an assessment that includes the aspect of time is necessary. This view involves a shift from views on animal welfare in terms of functioning or feeling well to a view on animal welfare that includes the aspect of natural living in which species-specific development is important. To show the impact of these points of view, we look at the practical implications for choices concerning the management of foot disorders in dairy cattle. 相似文献
8.
Pär Segerdahl 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2007,20(2):167-193
Although the notion of natural behavior occurs in many policy-making and legal documents on animal welfare, no consensus has
been reached concerning its definition. This paper argues that one reason why the notion resists unanimously accepted definition
is that natural behavior is not properly a biological concept, although it aspires to be one, but rather a philosophical tendency
to perceive animal behavior in accordance with certain dichotomies between nature and culture, animal and human, original
orders and invented artifacts. The paper scrutinizes the philosophy of natural behavior as it developed in the organic movement
in response to a perceived contrast between industrialized and traditional agriculture. There are two reasons for focusing
on the organic movement: (i) the emphasis on “the natural” is most accentuated there and has a long history, (ii) everyday
life on organic farms presupposes human/animal interplay, which conflicts with the philosophical tendency to separate nature
from culture. This mismatch between theory and practice helps us see why, and how, the philosophy of natural behavior needs
to be reconsidered. The paper proposes that we understand farms as local human/animal cultures, and asks what we can mean
my natural behavior in such contexts. Since domestic animals adapt to agricultural environments via interaction with caretakers,
such interplay is analyzed as “hub” in these animals’ natural behavior. 相似文献
9.
I. Anna S. Olsson Christian Gamborg Peter Sandøe 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2006,19(1):37-46
Animal welfare and the ethical issues it raises have been discussed intensively for a couple of decades. The emphasis has
been on the direct effects of housing and husbandry, but more attention is now being given to problems originating in selective
breeding. European attempts to adjust animal welfare legislation to deal with these problems have been largely unsuccessful,
but the fact that selective breeding can introduce welfare problems continues to place an ethical responsibility on the animal
breeding industry. Since breeding decisions are made centrally and, increasingly, internationally, strategic change is only
likely to occur if it is embedded in an international agreement of some kind. The aim of this paper is to describe the key
ethical issues facing animal breeding and assess the suggestion that the breeding industry itself can deal with ethical issues
by means of an ethical code. Results from recent projects involving commercial breeding enterprises are presented. 相似文献
10.
Richard P. Haynes 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2001,14(2):231-240
The quest for a ``theory of nonhuman minds' to assessclaims about the moral status of animals is misguided. Misframedquestions about animal minds facilitate the appropriation ofanimal welfare by the animal user industry. When misframed, thesequestions shift the burden of proof unreasonably to animalwelfare regulators. An illustrative instance of misframing can befound in the US National Research Council's 1998 publication thatreports professional efforts to define the psychologicalwell-being of nonhuman primates, a condition that the US 1985animal welfare act requires users of primates to promote. Thereport claims that ``psychological well-being' is a hypotheticalconstruct whose validity can only be determined by a theory thatdefines its properties and links it to observed data. Thisconception is used to contest common knowledge about animalwelfare by treating psychological well-being as a mentalcondition whose properties are difficult to discover. Thisframework limits regulatory efforts to treat animal subjects lessoppressively and serves the interests of the user industry.A more liberatory framework can be constructed by recognizing thecontested nature of welfare norms, where competing conceptions ofanimal welfare have implications about norm-setting authority, asit does in other regulatory contexts, e.g., food safety. Properlyconceptualized welfare should include both the avoidance ofdistressful circumstances and the relationship between ananimal's capacities to engage in enjoyable activities and itsopportunities to exercise these capacities. This conception ofanimal welfare avoids appropriation by scientific experts.The development of the psychological well-being regulation is agood illustration of how social norms are contested and thenappropriated, and a critique of this appropriation shows how itcan be challenged. 相似文献
11.
After satisfying their quantitative and qualitative needs as regards nutrition, consumers in developed countries are becoming
more involved in the ethical aspects of food production, especially when it relates to animal products. Social demands for
respecting animal welfare in housing systems are increasing rapidly, as is social awareness of human responsibility towards
farm animals. Many studies have been conducted on animal welfare measurement in different production systems, but the available
information for small ruminants remains insufficient. In this study, a 75 criteria-evaluation tool has been set up on the
basis of the five freedoms concept. Animal welfare considerations have been analyzed in 25 documents, including labeling schemes,
regulations, and recommendations from different European countries. The results show many differences between regular and
organic small ruminant farming standards. Emergency measures are generally lacking. A weak representation of psychological
aspects of animal welfare, especially by the current European legislation, is highlighted. 相似文献
12.
The Concept of Farm Animal Welfare: Citizen Perceptions and Stakeholder Opinion in Flanders, Belgium
Filiep Vanhonacker Wim Verbeke Els Van Poucke Zuzanna Pieniak Griet Nijs Frank Tuyttens 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2012,25(1):79-101
Several attempts to conceptualize farm animal welfare have been criticized for diverging reasons, among them often the failure
to incorporate the public concern and opinion. This paper’s objective is to develop a conception of farm animal welfare that
starts from the public’s perception and integrates the opinion of different stakeholder representatives, thus following a
fork-to-farm approach. Four qualitative citizen focus group discussions were used to develop a quantitative questionnaire,
which has been completed by a representative sample of Flemish citizens (n = 459). Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were applied to develop a conception of farm animal welfare starting
from an extended list of aspects that relate to animal production and associate with farm animal welfare in the public’s perception.
In depth interviews with stakeholder representatives were used to match and adapt the structure of the animal welfare conception
model. The resulting conception revealed seven dimensions grouped in two different levels. Three dimensions were animal-based:
“Suffering and Stress,” “Ability to Engage in Natural Behavior,” and “Animal Health.” Four dimensions were resource-based:
“Housing and Barn climate,” “Transport and Slaughter,” “Feed and Water,” and “Human-Animal Relationship.” This conception
is distinct from earlier attempts since it is based on public perceptions; it addresses the opinion of different stakeholders,
and it distinguishes empirically between animal-based and resource-based dimensions in the conceptualization of farm animal
welfare. The relevancy of a popular definition is supported by the present demand oriented economy, in which animal welfare
is a non-trade concern, and mainly left to the market where consumers still mainly act as individuals who calculate and weigh
pros and cons. 相似文献
13.
Stefan Aerts Dirk Lips Stuart Spencer Eddy Decuypere Johan De Tavernier 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2006,19(1):67-76
When making an assessment of animal welfare, it is important to take environmental (housing) or animal-based parameters into
account. An alternative approach is to focus on the behavior and appearance of the animal, without making actual measurements
or quantifying this. None of these tell the whole story. In this paper, we suggest that it is possible to find common ground
between these (seemingly) diametrically opposed positions and argue that this may be the way to deal with the complexity of
animal welfare. The model will have to be acceptable for the different parties that will be affected by it and real benefits
for the animal should result from it. This will be the basis of a practical ethical approach. All this can be condensed into
a model that essentially is made up out of three basic elements: the classical welfare analysis with an existing welfare assessment
tool, an assessment of the stockholder, and an implementation of the Free Choice Profiling technique. This new framework does
not pretend to be a different or better animal welfare matrix; it is intended to integrate existing knowledge and to provide
a practical tool to improve animal welfare. It identifies whether there are welfare problems on a farm, if present whether
these problems are caused by the housing system or the stockholder, and what can be done to improve the situation. 相似文献
14.
Continued concern for animal welfare may be alleviated when welfare would be monitored on farms. Monitoring can be characterized as an information system where various stakeholders periodically exchange relevant information. Stakeholders include producers, consumers, retailers, the government, scientists, and others. Valuating animal welfare in the animal-product market chain is regarded as a key challenge to further improve the welfare of farm animals and information on the welfare of animals must, therefore, be assessed objectively, for instance, through monitoring. Interviews with Dutch stakeholder representatives were conducted to identify their perceptions about the monitoring of animal welfare. Stakeholder perceptions were characterized in relation to the specific perspectives of each stakeholder. While producers tend to perceive welfare from a production point of view, consumers will use visual images derived from traditional farming and from the animals natural environments. Scientists perceptions of animal welfare are affected by the need to measure welfare with quantifiable parameters. Retailers and governments (policy makers) have views of welfare that are derived from their relationships with producers, consumers, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and scientists. All interviewed stakeholder representatives stated that animal welfare is important. They varied in the extent to which they weighted economic considerations relative to concern for the animals welfare. Many stakeholders emphasized the importance of communication in making a monitoring system work. Overall, the perspectives for the development of a sustainable monitoring system that substantially improves farm animal welfare were assessed as being poor in the short term. However, a reliable system could be initiated under certain conditions, such as integrated chains and with influential and motivated stakeholders. A scheme is described with attention points for the development of sustainable monitoring systems for farm animal welfare in the long term. 相似文献
15.
Hanneke J. Nijland Noelle M. C. Aarts Reint Jan Renes 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2013,26(3):523-535
The results of an empirical study into the perceptions of “hands-on” experts concerning the welfare of (non-human) animals in traveling circuses in the Netherlands are presented. A qualitative approach, based on in-depth conversations with trainers/performers, former trainers/performers, veterinarians, and an owner of an animal shelter, conveyed several patterns in the contextual construction of perceptions and the use of dissonance reduction strategies. Perceptions were analyzed with the help of the Symbolic Convergence Theory and the model of the frame of reference, consisting of knowledge, convictions, values, norms, and interests. The study shows that the debate regarding animals in circuses in the Netherlands is centered on the level of welfare that is required; the importance of animal welfare is not disputed. Arguments that were used differed according to the respondents’ specific backgrounds and can be placed on a gradient ranging from the conviction that the welfare of animals in circuses is sufficiently warranted and both human and animal enjoy the performance (right end), to the conviction that animal welfare in circuses is negative, combined with the idea that the goal of entertaining people does not outweigh that (left end). The study confirms that perceptions reflect people’s contexts, though the variety in scopes suggests that the (inter)relations between people and their context are complex in nature. Evidence of cognitive dissonance was abundant. Coping strategies were found to be used more by respondents towards the right end of the gradient, suggesting that those respondents experience more ambivalence. This encountered pattern of association between position on the gradient and frequency of dissonance reduction strategies calls for further research on the type of ambivalent feelings experienced. The authors argue that, to come to an agreement about the welfare of animals in circuses, including the way this welfare should be guaranteed, stakeholders from different contexts need to engage in a dialogue in which a distance is taken from right/wrong-schemes and that starts from acceptance of dilemmas and ambiguity. 相似文献
16.
Theofano Vetouli Vonne Lund Brigitte Kaufmann 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2012,25(3):349-364
In organic philosophy, the concept of “naturalness” is of major importance. According to the organic interpretation of animal welfare, natural living is considered a precondition for accomplishing welfare and the principal aims of organic production include the provision of natural living conditions for animals. However, respective regulations are lacking in organic legislation. In practice, the life of a calf in organic rearing systems can deviate from being natural, since common practices in dairy farms include early weaning, dehorning, or cow-calf separation soon after birth. This case study explores how calf welfare is approached in six different organic dairy farms and how far the concept of naturalness is implemented. The farms included in this study were located in Norway and Sweden. A semi-structured questionnaire was used for data collection. The interviewed farmers approach the concept of welfare in various ways and state that “naturalness” is an aspect of animal welfare. However, in practice in the calf rearing systems under study, only a few “naturalness” aspects were implemented. Reasons for the observed discrepancy might lie in differing understandings of “naturalness,” in economic restrictions, and in other trade-offs resulting from production system inherent characteristics and in limited regulation concerning provision of natural living aspects. 相似文献
17.
In 2005, The International Federation of Organic Agricultural Movements (IFOAM) developed four new ethical principles of organic agriculture to guide its future development: the principles of health, ecology, care, and fairness. The key distinctive concept of animal welfare in organic agriculture combines naturalness and human care, and can be linked meaningfully with these principles. In practice, a number of challenges are connected with making organic livestock systems work. These challenges are particularly dominant in immature agro-ecological systems, for example those that are characterized by industrialization and monoculture. Some of the current challenges are partly created by shortages of land and manure, which encourage zero-grazing and other confined systems. Other challenges are created in part by the conditions for farming and the way in which global food distribution systems are organized, e.g., how live animals are transported, how feed is traded and transported all over the globe, and the development of infrastructure and large herds. We find that the overall organic principles should be included when formulating guidelines for practical organic animal farming. This article explores how the special organic conceptions of animal welfare are related to the overall principles of organic agriculture. The aim is to identify potential routes for future development of organic livestock systems in different contexts and with reference to the specific understanding of animal welfare in organic agriculture. We include two contrasting cases represented by organic livestock systems in northwestern Europe and farming systems in tropical low-income countries; we use these cases to explore the widely different challenges of organic livestock systems in different parts of the world. 相似文献
18.
In this paper the authors argue that ethical considerations are relevant for evaluating animal production systems and that in consequence agrologists should seriously consider the arguments of animal welfare supporters. Furthermore, the authors point out the ethical basis for some (though not all) of the conclusions proposed by supporters of animal welfare. In consequence it is necessary to determine the nature of animal welfare and methods of evaluating the welfare of animals and to recognize when production systems fail to satisfy the needs of animals. 相似文献
19.
Frank W. Oudshoorn Reint Jan Renes Imke J. M. De Boer 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2008,21(3):205-228
The aim of this study was to explore stakeholder perceptions of the contribution of an Automatic Milking System (AMS) to sustainable
development of organic dairy production in Denmark and the Netherlands. In addition, reasons for the current difference in
AMS use on organic dairy farms between both countries were explored. To answer above mentioned aims, farmers and advisors
in both countries were interviewed using a focus group approach. Questions of the interviews were based on a literature review
on sustainability issues affected by introduction of AMS. Participants expressed no moral problems regarding AMS use. They,
however, pointed out uncertainty about the economic gain, difficulties with grazing, adaptation problems to technology, and
image problems towards consumers. The latter results from a reduction in grazing time affecting both animal welfare and product
quality. The participants did not recognize eutrophication, as result of high stocking density on farmstead lots, as a problem
caused by AMS. The milk quality problem related to AMS use, although acknowledged as crucial towards consumers, was not prioritized
very highly, especially not by the farmers in both countries. All groups were, however, unanimous in their perception of how
important image was as far as the consumers are concerned. The perception analysis revealed that Dutch participants were more
concerned about the economic payoff of AMS use, and showed more reluctance towards enlargement than Danish ones. In addition,
they acknowledged the small-scale naturalness of organic production. These differences in perception could possibly explain
observed differences in AMS use in organic dairy production between Denmark and the Netherlands. 相似文献
20.
Fred Gifford 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2000,13(3-4):249-257
The public attitude to animal use in Australia and New Zealandcan be inferred from survey results and political activity. The publicis concerned about the rights of animals as far as any uses causing painare concerned, but takes a more utilitarian view of the taking of lifewhere no suffering is involved. Many of the participants in two recentANZCCART conferences fall short in their knowledge of and attitudetoward these concerns. Animal welfare legislation and standards need tobe reformed so that painful animal use is eliminated, even if economicgrowth suffers as a result. 相似文献