共查询到15条相似文献,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1.
一枝黄花、巴西龟、水葫芦、水花生……目前我国的入侵生物已达五百多种,带来的生态环境破坏难以估计。近几年,因为国人的"吃货"本色,又"招惹"来一些新的入侵物种,福寿螺、鳄龟、奇雅子……人们在饱了口福的同时,给生态环境造成进一步破坏。 相似文献
2.
从"十八大"报告提出"要把资源消耗、环境损害、生态效益纳入经济社会发展评价体系,建立体现生态文明要求的目标体系、考核办法、奖惩机制",到十八届三中全会通过的《关于全面深化改革若干问题的决定》(以下简称"决定"),进一步明确要"完善发展成果考核评价体系,纠正单纯以经济增长速度评定政绩的偏向,加大资源消耗、环境损害、生态效益、产能过剩、科技创新、安全生产、新增债务等指标的权重,更加重视劳动就业、居民收入、社会保障、人民健康状况",再到最近中共中央组织部出台《关于改进地方党政领导班子和领导干部政绩考核工作的通知》(以下简称"通知")中看似简单的八条内容,是各地区各部门完善考核评价制度具体包括调整考核内容、清理考核指标、改进考核方式、完善考核结果运用所应遵循的原则和依据,是对地方领导班子和领导干部政绩考核制度的顶层设计,属政绩考核的“元”政策。 相似文献
3.
"有钱没钱回家过年。"回味刚刚过去的7天春节长假,很多人都是快乐并痛苦着。家人团聚、走亲访友固然温情无限,可少不了的"礼尚往来"花费却让他们直呼沦为了"节奴",叫苦不迭,何况咱置身的是"工资永远跟不上物价上涨步伐"的时代。 相似文献
4.
通过分析"象牙塔"精神和大学"社会化"的科学内涵,揭示了二者的合理性共生关系。要使"象牙塔"精神和大学"社会化"辩证融合,促进大学在实践中既崇尚学术又适应社会,应该走倡扬、培育"象牙塔"精神并让大学承担起应有的社会责任的路径。 相似文献
5.
7.
8.
9.
为了我们的切身利益,为了保证人类乘坐的"巨轮"的安全,必须高度警惕随时可能发生的危机——低碳可能是人类改变航线、避免"沉船"的一个很好的机遇。长期以来,我们擅长于制造词语、喊口号,"低碳"这一舶来的专业术语被中国社会尤其是官员们接受,并试图用于指导经济建设,过程之迅速超乎想象。其实低碳每个人都能够做到,技术上已不是什么难题。但愿这次"低碳"来的是行动,而不要重复"生态"口号贬值的老路。 相似文献
10.
11.
13.
14.
Exploiting Abstract Possibilities: A Critique of the Concept and Practice of Product Patenting 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
Hans Radder 《Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics》2004,17(3):275-291
Developments in biotechnology and genomics have moved the issue of patenting scientific and technological inventions toward the center of interest. In particular, the patentability of genes of plants, animals, or humans and of genetically modified (parts of) living organisms has been discussed, and questioned, from various normative perspectives. This paper aims to contribute to this debate. For this purpose, it first explains a number of relevant aspects of the theory and practice of patenting. The focus is on a special and increasingly significant type of patents, namely product patents. The paper provides three general arguments against the concept and practice of product patenting. The first argument briefly considers the claim that patents are legitimate because they promote socially useful innovation. Against this claim, it is argued that product patents may hamper rather than promote such innovation. The second and main argument concludes that product patents are not adequately based on actual technological inventions, as they should be according to the usual criteria of patentability. The principal moral issue is that product patents tend to reward patentees for inventions they have not really made available. The final argument proposes a method for patenting the heat of the sun. Assuming that granting this patent will be generally considered absurd, the argument exposes a further, fundamental problem of the concept and practice of product patenting. 相似文献