饮用水源区水中微囊藻毒素—LR检测——以四川省成都市百工堰水库为例

应用高效液相色谱法对四川省成都市饮用水源区--百工堰水库水样中的微囊藻毒素-LR进行检测.结果表明,水样中微囊藻毒素-LR的含量低于国家生活饮用水卫生标准(GB5749-2006)规定值.同时,对饮用水源水样水质的主要指标进行了测定,并探讨了微囊藻毒素-LR检测结果与水质监测结果的相关性.     

南水北调中线工程核心水源区水环境安全分析与对策

十堰市地处南水北调中线工程汉江中上游核心水源区腹地,对中线工程水源区水环境安全有着重要的意义和作用。本文论述了核心水源区污染状况及环境质量现状,对影响核心水源区水环境安全因素进行了分析,提出了对核心水源区水环境安全保护的建议和对策。     

南水北调水源区水资源安全的模糊综合评价——以中线工程南阳水源区为例

水源区的水资源安全是我国南水北调工程最为关键的问题之一,关系整个南水北调工程的成败,因此对其状况进行评价显得极为重要。根据目前学者对水资源安全评价做出的研究,结合南水北调中线工程水源区的具体特点,建立了水源区水资源安全评价体系,并利用AHP法确定各个指标的权重,运用多层次模糊综合评价法对中线工程南阳水源区2013年的水资源安全状况进行评价。评价结果表明,南阳水源区的水资源处于很安全的状态。根据评价结果,进一步分析了限制该水源区水资源安全的主要潜在因素。     

国外饮用水源保护管理体制对我国的启示

本文在对国外水源保护管理体制评介的基础上,对我国现行饮用水源保护管理体制进行深入反思,提出在饮用水源保护法律调控中改进我国饮用水源管理体制的具体对策,为我国饮用水源法制建设进行了有益的探索。     

通化市哈泥河饮用水源污染现状及防治对策

对通化市唯一饮用水源哈泥河的保护与管理现状进行了介绍,并针对存在的主要污染问题提出了防治对策。     

创新我国饮用水资源保护之法律制度

本文阐述了饮用水资源保护法律制度创新的必要性，并提出了法律制度创新的主要内容。     

湖北省饮用水源保护和可持续利用的立法思考

本文在对湖北省饮用水源保护的现状和法律调控的不足进行分析的基础上，提出完善湖北省饮用水源保护法律调控的必要性；分析了完善湖北省饮用水潭保护法律调控应遵循的指导思想和基本原则，并创新相应的法律制度，对湖北省饮用水源法制建设进行了探索。     

太原西山水源管理与保护的总体构想

太原在山西省能源重化工基地建设中起着举足轻重的作用,但由于水资源紧缺,其经济发展越来越受到制约.尤其是担负全市主要供水任务的太原西山水源区,资源开采长期得不到科学的管理与保护,致使可采水资源向量少质劣方面转化,经济效益受到威胁,存在着潜在的危机。本文在这方面进行了探讨和研究,以期更好地管理和有效利用西山现有资源,促进水资源的良性循环.     

白山市环保局开展饮用水源安全检查

为保证饮用水源环境安全,近日,白山市环保局开展了全市集中式饮用水源地专项检查。重点查看了各饮用水源保护区是否设立保护标牌、是否有排污口、是否有影响饮用水源地安全的污染和隐患,以及饮用水源地水质情况、取水情况、环境应急措施落实情况等,对发现的环境安全隐患问题,依法进行查处,确保饮用水源安全,保障人民群众的身体健康。     

可持续发展--我国饮用水源保护法律调控之指导思想

本文在分析饮用水源特性和我国实际管理情况的基础上提出我国饮用水源保护立法应以可持续发展为基本指导思想，并对完善或创新我国饮用水源保护法律调控提供了有关依据和思路。     

入河（海）排污口排查及其在水环境治理中的应用

随着我国在水生态环境治理方面的大力投入,全国水环境质量得到整体性改善;但水生态环境保护不平衡、不协调、不充分的问题依然突出,部分流域依然存在水资源短缺、水环境污染、水生态退化问题。排污口是陆源污染物进入水环境的主要通道,通过对排污口及其污染特征的全面排查,可识别影响流域水污染现状的关键因素;经过监测和溯源,打通污染物从污染水体—涉污路径—排污单位监管链条,实现水污染物产排的闭环监管,推进流域治理能力的现代化建设。本研究依据已开展的工作,梳理了排污口排查的主要流程、技术要点,并论述了排查结果的潜在应用,为深入推进水生态环境治理提供支撑。     

基于Alos的遥感技术在江苏省太湖流域一级保护区水环境综合整治中的应用

江苏省太湖流域一级保护区综合整治是治理太湖的重点工作,直接关系太湖湖体水环境质量。本文通过遥感技术对江苏省太湖流域一级保护区土地利用类型进行了解析,将一级保护区土地分解为15种利用类型,结果表明:一级保护区建设用地总面积为235.1km2,土地开发强度为17.2%。高强度的土地开发是造成太湖及主要入湖河流污染的首要原因,故整治太湖流域一级保护区首要任务是严格控制建设用地规模,降低污染物排放负荷。     

沿海油田污染物入海通量及优化管理

胜利油田所在的黄河三角洲诸条河流按入海类型分为三种形式：设有防潮闸的感潮河；设有排涝站的入海河；直流入海的感潮河。按照各河流入海段面、流速、流量和水体污染物浓度，建立起各种感潮河污染物入海通量模式，计算结果说明沿海油田排放的石油类污染物入海通量为1456t／a，COD入海量为5720t／a。根据各条入海河流不同功能和污染物入海量，按照国家地表水质标准，制定出入海河流环境组合目标，用总量控制方法提出污染源削减要求，以保证黄河三角洲沿海滩涂环境质量。并以污染物入海通量、河流径流量、污染物自净系数和污染物削减量等因子建立各条河流优化管理模型，为保护环境提供对策。     

四川省出川断面主要污染物通量及来源研究

以2001～2007年实测水文、水质数据为基础,计算了四川省主要出川断面高锰酸盐指数(CODMn)和氨氮(NH3-N)污染负荷通量;利用断面水质目标约束,通过污染负荷历时曲线,分析了区域水环境承载力;在基流分割的基础上,利用水文分割法,识别了区域污染物的主要来源,为从源头上开展三峡水库水环境保护提供数据支撑。分析结果表明,各出川断面干流主要污染物(CODMn、NH3-N)大致在可接受的范围内,2001年以来,出川断面CODMn通量呈降低的趋势,有效的减缓了输入三峡库区的污染物总量,氨氮通量整体稳定。嘉陵江、涪江、渠江流域污染物来源主要为非点源,应重点加强面源的污染防控;长江干流为点面源混合型,简单的削减点源已不能保证高功能水体要求,应加强点源和面源污染的综合防控。     

流域水体生态修复技术探讨

针对河道等自然流域的水体污染物进行生态治理,作者提出运用三个独立步骤而形成一道自然水体修复功能：第一步,优选良性微生物株群并持续发展与供给;第二步,运用河道功能增加水中的溶解氧;第三步,建立流域水体生物链,从而达到流域水体消纳污染物的自净效果。     

秦皇岛市“十一五”期间环境质量变化趋势及成因分析

"十一五"期间,秦皇岛市环境质量总体趋于好转。环境空气质量Ⅱ级以上天数始终保持在350天以上,综合污染指数明显下降;城市集中式饮用水源地水质达标率100%;地表水河流Ⅲ类断面比例提高了43.8%;劣Ⅴ类断面比例降低了35.7%。近岸海域海水水质达标率100%,海水浴场水质良好。但存在局部空气污染严重、部分河段水质恶化等主要环境问题,针对上述问题提出了总量减排、污染物联控等对策建议。     

Human impacts on the stream-groundwater exchange zone

Active exchanges of water and dissolved material between the stream and groundwater in many porous sand- and gravel-bed rivers create a dynamic ecotone called the hyporheic zone. Because it lies between two heavily exploited freshwater resources—rivers and groundwater—the hyporheic zone is vulnerable to impacts coming to it through both of these habitats. This review focuses on the direct and indirect effects of human activity on ecosystem functions of the hyporheic zone. River regulation, mining, agriculture, urban, and industrial activities all have the potential to impair interstitial bacterial and invertebrate biota and disrupt the hydrological connections between the hyporheic zone and stream, groundwater, riparian, and floodplain ecosystems. Until recently, our scientific ignorance of hyporheic processes has perhaps excused the inclusion of this ecotone in river management policy. However, this no longer is the case as we become increasingly aware of the central role that the hyporheic zone plays in the maintenance of water quality and as a habitat and refuge for fauna. To fully understand the impacts of human activity on the hyporheic zone, river managers need to work with scientists to conduct long-term studies over large stretches of river. River rehabilitation and protection strategies need to prevent the degradation of linkages between the hyporheic zone and surrounding habitats while ensuring that it remains isolated from toxicants. Strategies that prevent anthropogenic restriction of exchanges may include the periodic release of environmental flows to flush silt and reoxygenate sediments, maintenance of riparian buffers, effective land use practices, and suitable groundwater and surface water extraction policies.     

嘉陵江C市段源水中有机污染物定性研究

采用XAD-2树脂富集水中有机物，用GC＼MS进行定性分析。对嘉陵江C市段水源水中有机污染物进行分析，共检出有机污染物13种，其中以多环芳烃，邻苯二甲酸酯类为主，并且有3种物质为中国环境优先控制污染物，分别是邻苯二甲酸二辛酯，邻苯二甲酸二丁酯、荧蒽。     

Human Impacts on the Stream–Groundwater Exchange Zone

Active exchanges of water and dissolved material between the stream and groundwater in many porous sand- and gravel-bed rivers create a dynamic ecotone called the hyporheic zone. Because it lies between two heavily exploited freshwater resources—rivers and groundwater—the hyporheic zone is vulnerable to impacts coming to it through both of these habitats. This review focuses on the direct and indirect effects of human activity on ecosystem functions of the hyporheic zone. River regulation, mining, agriculture, urban, and industrial activities all have the potential to impair interstitial bacterial and invertebrate biota and disrupt the hydrological connections between the hyporheic zone and stream, groundwater, riparian, and floodplain ecosystems. Until recently, our scientific ignorance of hyporheic processes has perhaps excused the inclusion of this ecotone in river management policy. However, this no longer is the case as we become increasingly aware of the central role that the hyporheic zone plays in the maintenance of water quality and as a habitat and refuge for fauna. To fully understand the impacts of human activity on the hyporheic zone, river managers need to work with scientists to conduct long-term studies over large stretches of river. River rehabilitation and protection strategies need to prevent the degradation of linkages between the hyporheic zone and surrounding habitats while ensuring that it remains isolated from toxicants. Strategies that prevent anthropogenic restriction of exchanges may include the periodic release of environmental flows to flush silt and reoxygenate sediments, maintenance of riparian buffers, effective land use practices, and suitable groundwater and surface water extraction policies.     

Multiple Interactive Pollutants in Water Quality Trading

Efficient environmental management calls for the consideration of multiple pollutants, for which two main types of transferable discharge permit (TDP) program have been described: separate permits that manage each pollutant individually in separate markets, with each permit based on the quantity of the pollutant or its environmental effects, and weighted-sum permits that aggregate several pollutants as a single commodity to be traded in a single market. In this paper, we perform a mathematical analysis of TDP programs for multiple pollutants that jointly affect the environment (i.e., interactive pollutants) and demonstrate the practicality of this approach for cost-efficient maintenance of river water quality. For interactive pollutants, the relative weighting factors are functions of the water quality impacts, marginal damage function, and marginal treatment costs at optimality. We derive the optimal set of weighting factors required by this approach for important scenarios for multiple interactive pollutants and propose using an analytical elasticity of substitution function to estimate damage functions for these scenarios. We evaluate the applicability of this approach using a hypothetical example that considers two interactive pollutants. We compare the weighted-sum permit approach for interactive pollutants with individual permit systems and TDP programs for multiple additive pollutants. We conclude by discussing practical considerations and implementation issues that result from the application of weighted-sum permit programs.