共查询到20条相似文献,搜索用时 109 毫秒
1.
2.
3.
4.
烷基苯厂锅炉烟气除尘系统改造选用文丘里麻石水膜除尘器,除尘脱硫废水与碱性冲渣水中和、过滤后再循环泵提升至冲渣系统,实现燃煤锅炉除尘脱硫废水循环利用。改造后的除尘系统运行情况良好,锅炉的烟尘排放浓度及烟气黑度均达到了国家现行三类区排放标准,二氧化硫排放浓度低于国家允许排放标准。 相似文献
5.
6.
7.
8.
烟气冷凝节能与脱硫装置是适用于燃油燃气锅炉的新装置。本文介绍了该装置节能及脱硫的基本原理,利用81.4KW天然气锅炉实验系统对装置 的传热和脱硫特性进行了研究。实验表明,该装置提高锅炉效率为3%-8%,脱硫效率为20%-40%。 相似文献
9.
燃煤锅炉水蒸气促燃的理论研究 总被引:2,自引:1,他引:1
王文奎 《环境污染治理技术与设备》2001,2(5):14-19
针对小型火力热电厂中小吨位燃煤锅炉应用现状,结合固体燃煤燃烧伯机理,在详细分析常见锅炉工作原理和燃烧反应特性的基础上,提出了用水蒸气促燃降污节能的理论,水蒸气介入后促燃化学植物和物理模型的建立,证明了这一理论的可行性。 相似文献
10.
燃煤锅炉烟气NOx污染等离子体治理技术 总被引:11,自引:0,他引:11
燃煤锅炉烟气NOx污染治理技术种类较多。本文综合评述了各种烟气NOx污染等离子体治理技术,重点介绍了电晕放电脱除烟气中NOx的最新研究成果。对燃煤锅炉烟气NOx污染治理技术的研究和开发具有实用价值。 相似文献
11.
介绍了一种集多种湿法除尘技术之长于一体的新型组合式除尘装置,该装置不仅能有效地消除手烧锅炉燃烧时产生的烟尘,而且实现了除尘水的内循环,消除了其他湿式除尘器所带来的水的二次污染问题。 相似文献
12.
13.
14.
对锅炉烟气处理工艺进行了改造,运行结果表明,改造后的处理效果明显提高,解决了烟尘及SO2排放浓度的超标问题,实现了达标排放。 相似文献
15.
以86台中小型燃烟煤层燃炉(≤65 MW)的燃料特性分析数据和NOx排放实测数据为基础,通过统计分析方法,研究了锅炉出力、过量空气系数、燃煤挥发分、燃煤氮含量对NOx排放浓度的影响,分析了我国中小型燃烟煤层燃炉NOx的排放与管理控制现状。结果表明,中小型燃用烟煤层燃炉NOx平均排放浓度为324.6 mg/m^3;锅炉出力对NOx排放浓度不具有显著影响;燃煤挥发分增高,NOx排放浓度降低;过量空气系数和燃煤氮含量增大,NOx排放浓度增高;并建议在国家层面上尽快制订燃煤锅炉NOx排放标准限值。 相似文献
16.
以86台中小型燃烟煤层燃炉(≤65 MW)的燃料特性分析数据和NOx排放实测数据为基础,通过统计分析方法,研究了锅炉出力、过量空气系数、燃煤挥发分、燃煤氮含量对NOx排放浓度的影响,分析了我国中小型燃烟煤层燃炉NOx的排放与管理控制现状。结果表明,中小型燃用烟煤层燃炉NOx平均排放浓度为324.6 mg/m3;锅炉出力对NOx排放浓度不具有显著影响;燃煤挥发分增高,NOx排放浓度降低;过量空气系数和燃煤氮含量增大,NOx排放浓度增高;并建议在国家层面上尽快制订燃煤锅炉NOx排放标准限值。 相似文献
17.
通过对山东电网所属发电厂锅炉NOx排放状况进行调查、测试,得出锅炉NOx排放量与煤种、炉型、燃烧器型式、运行中空气过剩系数、负荷等的关系.结果表明,山东省火力发电厂50 MW及以上容量机组2003年的NOx排放总量超过40万t(按NO2计算).控制和治理NOx排放已成为刻不容缓的重要工作. 相似文献
18.
Ge S Bai Z Liu W Zhu T Wang T Qing S Zhang J 《Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association (1995)》2001,51(4):524-533
Stack gas emissions were characterized for a steam-generating boiler commonly used in China. The boiler was tested when fired with a newly formulated boiler briquette coal (BB-coal) and when fired with conventional raw coal (R-coal). The stack gas emissions were analyzed to determine emission rates and emission factors and to develop chemical source profiles. A dilution source sampling system was used to collect PM on both Teflon membrane filters and quartz fiber filters. The Teflon filters were analyzed gravimetrically for PM10 and PM2.5 mass concentrations and by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) for trace elements. The quartz fiber filters were analyzed for organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) using a thermal/optical reflectance technique. Sulfur dioxide was measured using the standard wet chemistry method. Carbon monoxide was measured using an Orsat combustion analyzer. The emission rates of the R-coal combustion (in kg/hr), determined using the measured stack gas concentrations and the stack gas emission rates, were 0.74 for PM10, 0.38 for PM2.5, 20.7 for SO2, and 6.8 for CO, while those of the BB-coal combustion were 0.95 for PM10, 0.30 for PM2.5, 7.5 for SO2, and 5.3 for CO. The fuel-mass-based emission factors (in g/kg) of the R-coal, determined using the emission rates and the fuel burn rates, were 1.68 for PM10, 0.87 for PM2.5, 46.7 for SO2, and 15 for CO, while those of the BB-coal were 2.51 for PM10, 0.79 for PM2.5, 19.9 for SO2, and 14 for CO. The task-based emission factors (in g/ton steam generated) of the R-coal, determined using the fuel-mass-based emission factors and the coal/steam conversion factors, were 0.23 for PM10, 0.12 for PM2.5, 6.4 for SO2, and 2.0 for CO, while those of the BB-coal were 0.30 for PM10, 0.094 for PM2.5, 2.4 for SO2, and 1.7 for CO. PM10 and PM2.5 elemental compositions are also presented for both types of coal tested in the study. 相似文献
19.
Boiler briquette coal versus raw coal: Part II--Energy, greenhouse gas, and air quality implications
The objective of this paper is to conduct an integrated analysis of the energy, greenhouse gas, and air quality impacts of a new type of boiler briquette coal (BB-coal) in contrast to those of the raw coal from which the BB-coal was formulated (R-coal). The analysis is based on the source emissions data and other relevant data collected in the present study and employs approaches including the construction of carbon, energy, and sulfur balances. The results show that replacing R-coal with BB-coal as the fuel for boilers such as the one tested would have multiple benefits, including a 37% increase in boiler thermal efficiency, a 25% reduction in fuel demand, a 26% reduction in CO2 emission, a 17% reduction in CO emission, a 63% reduction in SO2 emission, a 97% reduction in fly ash and fly ash carbon emission, a 22% reduction in PM2.5 mass emission, and a 30% reduction in total emission of five toxic hazardous air pollutant (HAP) metals contained in PM10. These benefits can be achieved with no changes in boiler hardware and with a relatively small amount of tradeoffs: a 30% increase in PM10 mass emission and a 9-16% increase in fuel cost. 相似文献