煤矿不同群体间安全文化认知的比较研究

为探究煤矿企业不同群体员工对安全文化认知的差异,将企业员工划分为管理层、专业人员、班组长和一线员工4类群体。通过问卷和SCAP（safety culture analysis program）系统分析等方法,对南阳矿业公司下属3个煤矿中的150名员工进行了安全文化认知水平测评,并利用SPSS 18.0对所得数据进行处理。结果表明:不同群体间安全文化认知水平存在显著差异,样本群体对于企业理念理解、安全业绩、员工违章3个要素认知水平较低;管理层、专业人员、班组长和一线员工安全文化认知水平得分分别为74.4,75,76.4和73.2,其中,班组长的安全文化认知水平最高,一线员工的安全文化认知水平最低,且管理层人员的安全文化认知水平较国际上安全业绩最好企业的同类人员偏低,差值达19.2分。     

浅谈班组安全管理培训课程的设计

班组长培训班主要是面向生产一线班组长展开的培训。班组长属于“兵头将尾”,自己本身是生产一线的员工,同时也是最接近一线生产的管理者。通过培训,旨在提高生产一线班组长的管理能力和操作技能。培训的内容主要包括班组基础管理、现场管理、质量管理、经济核算、安全管理和管理团队建设。     

个人防护系列（PPE）在线课程

培训机构：泰致德专业技术服务（深圳）有限公司 培训形式：中文在线课程（动画＋讲解＋测试题） 培训对象：一线员工、生产监督、安全监督、部分负责人、车问主任、班组长等。 培训特色：泰致德推出最新学习模式,加入会员可全年免费学习所有VIP在线课程。     

重视自身化工事故应急救援能力是企业的当务之急

从近几年的化工安全事故分析入手,探讨企业危险化学品安全应急责任重在管理层,关键在管理层的责任意志,加强员工的行动力,切实做好各级管理层和一线员工的不同层次的相关培训和教育,加强监管,强化实际操作和演练,增强企业的安全文化建设,提高企业的安全应急救援能力,做到有备无患,为企业保驾护航。     

细说“模式”

国家法律法规对企业负责人、安全管理人员、班组长、一线员工、新上岗从业人员的安全培训学时提出了要求,但没有规定具体的培训内容;HSE体系“能力、培训与意识”提出要确保每个员工有与工作岗位相适应的HSE能力,公司两万余人,作业方式广泛,逐个分析每个员工的HSE能力,工作量大,可操作性不强。以上就是安全培训面临的问题。     

番禺油田安全培训的技巧

安全培训首先要确定受训人员,根据人员素质、工种来制定培训教材、培训计划和方案;其次是企业管理层的重视和支持。当企业与国际接轨后,必然使企业各项管理工作变得更加透明,企业员工、社会上的股东和股民就会更加了解企业,这样企业管理层不得不关注生产安全和员工生命安全;最后     

点将台

<正>本期点题来自某单位安全管理人员浮冰Q:如何让安全培训真正见效,比如影响人员的行为,除了事故案例及后续评估、分析等,还有其他方法么?A:浮冰,你好!企业通过实施系统化的安全培训,可以建立起员工的安全意识,以及培养员工的安全思维和训练员工的安全行为,从而形成优秀的企业安全文化。对于如何做好安全培训,需要从以下几方面考虑其有效性、充分性及适用性。一是来自于企业管理层的高度     

体验仿真实物安全培训

安全培训是为提高安全监管监察人员、生产经营单位从业人员、安全生产工作人员以及企业一线员工的安全素质的。对企业员工的培训一直囿于理论知识宣贯,效果不佳,是很多企业饱受困扰的问题。如何突破安全培训的传统模式,更有效发挥其作用,     

煤矿顶板事故不安全动作分析及预防

煤矿顶板事故多发,但由于不易造成群死群伤的重特大事故而得不到人们足够的重视,因此有必要对顶板事故原因进行分析并提出对策。基于行为安全"2-4"模型,分析了50起典型煤矿顶板事故的不安全动作,得到需要重点预防的不安全动作为违章指挥、未检查工作环境、空顶作业、安全监察工作不到位、支护质量差。将煤矿工作人员分类后分析得出,对事故影响最大的人员类别是现场指挥人员和一线员工,煤矿需对此二类人员进行重点培训。煤矿首先应纠正员工的不安全动作,培养其安全动作习惯,其次通过安全文化的宣贯和安全管理体系的完善,加强管理监督,组织循环安全培训,丰富工作人员的安全知识、提高工作人员的安全意识、培养员工安全的工作习惯,逐步使其从认识上改变工作作风,杜绝不安全动作的发出。     

新汶矿业孙村煤矿创班组管理“三字经”

山东新汶矿业集团公司孙村煤矿掘进一区班长刘海春,每天带领11名员工列队下井接班,到达现场后的第一件事就是向大家进行现场安全说明,然后,在带领大家进行了现场安全隐患排查后,才组织分工、进入正常的工作状态,并随时检查现场质量标准化工作。据悉,使这种规范的班组操作流程不走样、不变形的关键,就是该矿为班组管理创造的紧、严、暖“三字经”在做保障。“紧”即学习培训紧。该矿从改善提高班组长队伍业务素质、知识结构和工作能力上下功夫,认真抓好班组长的培、复训工作。除每年一次安全培训外,所有新任班组长还要参加不少于7天的岗前脱…     

Change in frontline supervisors’ safety leadership practices after participating in a leadership training program: Does company size matter?

Introduction: The majority of construction companies are small businesses and small business often lack the resources needed to ensure that their supervisors have the safety leadership skills to build and maintain a strong jobsite safety climate. The Foundations for Safety Leadership (FSL) training program was designed to provide frontline leaders in all sized companies with safety leadership skills. This paper examines the impact of the FSL training by size of business. Methods: Leaders, defined as foremen or other frontline supervisors, from small, medium, and large construction companies were recruited to participate in a study to evaluate the degree to which the FSL changed their understanding and use of the leadership skills, safety practices and crew reporting of safety-related conditions. We used linear mixed modeling methods to analyze pre-post training survey data. Results: Prior to the training, leaders from small and medium sized companies reported using safety leadership skills less frequently than those from large ones. After the training, regardless of business size, we observed that the FSL training improved leaders understanding of safety leadership skills from immediately before to immediately after the training. Additionally, leaders reported greater use of safety leadership skills, safety practices, and crew reporting of safety-related conditions from before to two-weeks after the training. However, those from small and medium sized companies reported the greatest improvement in their use of safety leadership skills. Conclusions: The FSL training improves safety leadership outcomes regardless of the size company for which the leader worked. However, the FSL may be even more effective at improving the safety leadership skills of leaders working for smaller sized construction companies or those with lower baseline levels of safety leadership skills. Practical applications: The majority of construction companies employ a small number of employees and therefore may not have the resources to provide their frontline leaders with the leadership training they need to be effective leaders who can create a strong jobsite safety climate. The Foundations for Safety Leadership (FSL) training can help fill this gap.     

A training intervention to improve frontline construction leaders' safety leadership practices and overall jobsite safety climate

Introduction: The 2.5 h Foundations for Safety Leadership (FSL) training program teaches construction supervisors the leadership skills they need to strengthen jobsite safety climate and reduce adverse safety-related outcomes. Methods: Using a quasi-experimental prospective switching replications study design, we examined (1) if FSL-trained jobsite safety leaders would report improved understanding and practice of the FSL leadership skills, safety practices and crew reporting of safety related conditions, and (2) if their crew perceived a change in (a) their supervisors' practices, (b) their own safety practices and reporting of safety-related conditions, and (c) overall jobsite safety climate. Twenty construction sub-contracting companies were recruited and randomly assigned to either an early or lagged-control training group. Participating supervisors and workers completed surveys at multiple time points before and after the FSL training. We used linear mixed modeling to test changes over time. Results: Only supervisors in the early group reported a statistically significant improvement in their understanding and practice of the leadership skills as well as safety practices from before to 2- and 4-weeks post-training. Overall, no significant change was detected in crew-reported outcomes from before to after their supervisors' participated in the FSL training. Conclusions: These results provide evidence that the FSL training can, at least in the short-term, improve construction frontline leaders' jobsite leadership skills. Future research could include an evaluation of FSL refresher activities and a longer-term follow-up. Practical applications: The Foundations for Safety Leadership (FSL) program fills an identified need for construction frontline supervisors to learn and practice critical safety leadership skills on the jobsite. It has already reached over 60,000 leaders and has the potential to reach over 100,000 each year during either an OSHA 30-h or a stand-alone course.     

Measuring safety climate in elderly homes

IntroductionProvision of a valid and reliable safety climate dimension brings enormous benefits to the elderly home sector. The aim of the present study was to make use of the safety climate instrument developed by OSHC to measure the safety perceptions of employees in elderly homes such that the factor structure of the safety climate dimensions of elderly homes could be explored.MethodIn 2010, surveys by mustering on site method were administered in 27 elderly homes that had participated in the "Hong Kong Safe and Healthy Residential Care Home Accreditation Scheme" organized by the Occupational Safety and Health Council.ResultsSix hundred and fifty-one surveys were returned with a response rate of 54.3%. To examine the factor structure of safety climate dimensions in our study, an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) using principal components analysis method was conducted to identify the underlying factors. The results of the modified seven-factor's safety climate structure extracted from 35 items better reflected the safety climate dimensions of elderly homes. The Cronbach alpha range for this study (0.655 to 0.851) indicated good internal consistency among the seven-factor structure. Responses from managerial level, supervisory and professional level, and front-line staff were analyzed to come up with the suggestion on effective ways of improving the safety culture of elderly homes. The overall results showed that managers generally gave positive responses in the factors evaluated, such as "management commitment and concern to safety," "perception of work risks and some contributory influences," "safety communication and awareness," and "safe working attitude and participation." Supervisors / professionals, and frontline level staff on the other hand, have less positive responses. The result of the lowest score in the factors - "perception of safety rules and procedures" underlined the importance of the relevance and practicability of safety rules and procedures.ConclusionThe modified OSHC safety climate tool provided better evidence of structural validity and reliability for use by elderly homes' decision makers as an indicator of employee perception of safety in their institution.Impact on industryThe findings and suggestions in the study provide useful information for the management, supervisors/professionals and frontline level staff to cultivate the safety culture in the elderly home sector. Most important, elderly homes can use the modified safety climate scale to identify problem areas in their safety culture and safety management practices and then target these for intervention.     

What does ‘safe’ look and feel like?

In this paper, the authors answer the question and help readers to form a view of ‘what does safe look and feel like’? Five important aspects of safety are addressed logically: Safety Culture, Safety Awareness, Safety Function, Processes, and Training. In each part, rather than just address what elements are involved and the importance of every element, this paper also provides general ideas and examples to help improve the level of safety. While safety culture is to a large extent influenced by the leadership; a best-in-class safety culture can be self-perpetuating particularly if the initial journey to best-in-class safety culture embeds the concepts of safety awareness, safety functions, processes and training in the organization. The paper provides an overview of safety related actions, tools, and processes that High Reliability Organizations follow, and should serve as a benchmark for other organizations of all sizes in search of safety improvement.     

金川集团安全生产标准化升级跨越建设途径探索与实践

针对安全生产标准化建设存在的问题,结合金川集团的实际情况,提出了"将安全生产标准化纳入企业安全文化范畴进行建设"。实现升级跨越建设的思路是围绕"零伤害"的安全生产方针,以矿山采矿盘区为单位建立安全标准化组织机构,开展"安全三区"危险源辨识和风险管控,在此基础上建立安全物质标准文化、安全管理标准文化和安全行为标准文化,结合安全文化"五阶段"塑培模式,打造安全自律型和本质安全型的标准化员工队伍,通过"匹配化"与"对标管理"的方式保证安全标准化持续改进模式。实践经验对金属非金属矿山安全生产标准化创建活动具有参考意义。     

企业安全文化管理技术体系理论与实践探讨

为推动企业安全文化建设,实现不同群体行为安全整体协同发展,应用协同理论、自适应性管理及行为安全等方法,架构了企业安全文化管理技术体系。该技术体系强调安全文化整体提升需要外部推动力(企业例行的安全管理制度)及内部自驱力(员工安全文化自律提升)协同发展,最终实现由外部推动力向内部自驱力的转化。将构建的技术体系引入试点矿进行有效性验证,并运行2个周期。运行评估结果表明,试点矿不同群体对安全文化意识均呈整体提升,增长幅度比较大的是高层管理者(55.13%),其次是中层管理者(4.74%),一线员工层(4.48%)、培训层(3.69%)。     

计算机网络考试系统在山西煤矿安全培训中的应用实践

安全培训在煤矿安全管理中发挥着重要的作用。山西煤炭资源丰富,有包括地方、乡镇在内的煤矿4000余个,更需要通过科学、公正的考核手段保证安全培训质量,提高煤矿企业负责人的素质来保证煤矿的安全生产。传统的安全培训考试由于受到人力、物力和人情关系等主客观因素的影响,难以达到完全的公平、公正。而计算机网络考试通过题库随机出题、标准化判卷等技术手段恰好可以解决这些问题。由山西煤矿安全监察局组织开发的“山西省煤矿安全培训考试系统”,经过一年多安全培训考核的实践,取得良好的效果,基本实现了预期的设想。该系统的开发和应用为安全培训的科学化、规范化,为提高各类煤矿企业负责人的素质作出了有益的尝试。     

Implementation of participatory organizational change in long term care to improve safety

Introduction: Long Term Care (LTC) facilities are fast-paced, demanding environments placing workers at significant risk for injuries. Health and safety interventions to address hazards in LTC are challenging to implement. The study assessed a participatory organizational change intervention implementation and impacts. Methods: This was a mixed methods implementation study with a concurrent control, conducted from 2017 to 2019 in four non-profit LTC facilities in Ontario, Canada. Study participants were managers and frontline staff. Intervention sites implemented a participatory organizational change program, control sites distributed one-page health and safety pamphlets. Program impact data were collected via Survey (self-efficacy, control over work, pain and general health) and observation (Quick Exposure Checklist). Interviews/focus groups were used to collect program implementation data. Results: Participants described program impacts (hazard controls through equipment purchase/modification, practice changes, and education/training) and positive changes in culture, communication and collaboration. There was a statistically significant difference in manager self-efficacy for musculoskeletal disorder (MSD) hazards between the control and intervention sites over time but no other statistical differences were found. Key program implementation challenges included LTC hazards, staff shortage/turnover, safety culture, staff time to participate, and communication. Facilitators included frontline staff involvement during implementation, management support, focusing on a single unit, training, and involving an external program facilitator. Conclusion: A participatory program can have positive impacts on identifying and reducing MSD hazards. Key to success is involving frontline staff in identifying hazards and creating solutions and management encouragement on a unit working together. High turnover rates, staffing shortages, and time constraints were barriers as they are for all organizational change efforts in LTC. The implementation findings are likely applicable in any jurisdiction. Practical Application: Implementing a participatory organizational change program to reduce MSD hazards is feasible in LTC and can improve communication and aid in identification and control of hazards.     

A comparative analysis of safety management and safety performance in twelve construction projects

IntroductionSafety management in construction is complicated due to the complex “nature” of the construction industry. The aim of this research was to identify safety management factors (e.g., risk management and site management), contextual factors (e.g., organisational complexity) and combinations of such factors connected to safety performance. Method: Twelve construction projects were selected to compare their safety management and safety performance. An analytical framework was developed based on previous research, regulations, and standards where each management factor was defined. We employed qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to produce case knowledge, compare the cases, and identify connections between the factors and safety performance. The material collected and analyzed included, for example, construction planning documents, reports from OHS-inspections, safety indicators, and interviews with project leaders and OHS experts. Results and conclusions: The research showed that: (a) the average score on 12 safety management factors was higher among projects with high safety performance compared to projects with low safety performance; (b) high safety performance can be achieved with both high and low construction complexity and organizational complexity, but these factors complicate coordination of actors and operations; (c) it is possible to achieve high safety performance despite relatively poor performance on many safety management factors; (d) eight safety management factors were found to be “necessary” for high safety performance, namely roles and responsibilities, project management, OHS management and integration, safety climate, learning, site management, staff management, and operative risk management. Site management, operative risk management, and staff management were the three factors most strongly connected to safety performance. Practical implications: Construction stakeholders should understand that the ability to achieve high safety performance in construction projects is connected to key safety management factors, contextual factors, and combinations of such factors.