Advanced site diagnostic tool 3D‐CSIA for in situ remediation

In situ remediation is inherently considered “green remediation.” The mechanisms of destruction by in situ technologies, however, are often unseen and not well understood. Further, physical effects of amendment application affect concentration data in an identical manner as the desired reactive mechanism. These uncertainties have led to the weight‐of‐evidence approach when proving viability: multiple rounds of data collection, bench studies, pilot studies, and so on. Skipping these steps has resulted in many failed in situ applications. Traditional assessment data are often tangential to the desired information (e.g., “Is contaminant being destroyed or just being pushed around and diluted?” and “What is the mechanism of the destruction and can it be monitored directly?”). An advanced site diagnostic tool, “Three‐Dimensional Compound Specific Stable Isotope Analysis” (3D‐CSIA), can assess the viability of in situ technologies by providing definitive data on contaminant destruction that are not concentration‐related. The 3D‐CSIA tool can also locate source zones and apportion remediation cost by identifying plumes of different isotope signatures and fractionation trends. Further, use of the 3D‐CSIA tool allows remediation professionals to evaluate effectiveness of treatment and make better decisions to expedite site closure and minimize costs. This article outlines the fundamentals of advanced site diagnostic tool 3D‐CSIA in detail, and its benefit is highlighted through a series of case studies at chlorinated solvent–contaminated sites. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Breakthrough in 2D‐CSIA Technology for 1,4‐Dioxane

A dual isotope technology based on compound‐specific stable isotope analysis of carbon and hydrogen (2D‐CSIA) was recently developed to help identify sources and monitor in situ degradation of the contaminant 1,4‐dioxane (1,4‐D) in groundwater. Site investigation and optimized remediation have been the focus of thousands of CSIA applications completed for volatile organic contaminants (VOCs) worldwide. CSIA for the water miscible 1,4‐D, however, has been technically challenging. The most commercially available sample preparation settings “Purge and Trap” for VOC could not efficiently extract 1,4‐D out of water for a reliable CSIA measurement, especially when the concentration is below 100 μg/L. Such a high reporting limit has prevented CSIA from being used for effective site investigation and remediation monitoring at most 1,4‐D contaminated sites, where 1,4‐D is often present at very low ppb levels. This article outlines the recent breakthrough in 2D‐CSIA technology for 1,4‐D in water, reported down to ～1 μg/L for carbon, and ～10 μg/L to 20 μg/L for hydrogen using solid‐phase extraction based on EPA Method 522, and its benefit is highlighted through a case study at a 1,4‐D contaminated site. ©2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Remediating Contaminated Groundwater With Low‐Capacity Injection and Nonpumped Wells

This modeling study evaluated the capability of low‐capacity wells injecting clean water and nonpumped wells equipped with filter media for containing and removing a contaminant plume in groundwater. Outcomes were compared for configurations of: (1) nonpumped wells, (2) nonpumped wells and injection wells (injecting less than 1 m³/d), and (3) no wells (baseline scenario). Results suggest that hybrid configurations featuring both types of wells can be an effective, low‐cost strategy for containing and remediating contaminated groundwater. Strategically positioned injection wells funnel contaminant plumes toward nonpumped wells, thus requiring fewer nonpumped wells to contain and remove a contaminant plume. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Smart Characterization—An Integrated Approach for Evaluating a Complex 1,4‐Dioxane Site

Smart characterization approaches apply the latest high‐resolution site characterization methods to find the contaminant mass flux, by integrating relative permeability mapping, classical hydrostratigraphy interpretation, and high‐density groundwater and saturated soil sampling. The key factor that makes Smart characterization different is the application of quantitative saturated soil sampling in less permeable slow advection and storage zones to diagnose plume maturity and understand its implications for remedy selection and performance. Because direct sensing tools like the membrane interface probe are capable of providing screening‐level assessments for hydrocarbons and chlorinated solvents in storage zones, but not 1,4‐dioxane, the recommended Smart approach involves application of specialized high‐capacity mobile laboratories or rapid turn‐around using fixed commercial labs. In addition to the benefit of rapidly characterizing sites, Smart characterization facilitates a flux‐based conceptual site model, which allows stakeholders to focus remedies on the mobile portion of the contaminant mass or, in effect, the mass that matters. Through systematic planning and implementation, predesign characterization can be completed to optimize source and plume remedy strategies, balancing investment in Smart characterization with reductions in total life‐cycle costs to ensure that an appropriate return on investigation is obtained.  © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.