重基础、抓管理、求发展

重基础、抓管理、求发展（大港石油管理局环境监测中心站）大港石油管理局环境监测中心站组建于１９８２年，十余年来，我们本着边生产边建设的建站原则，在实践中求发展，现已具备一定的规模和实力。目前全站共有职工１６人，仪器设备６０多台，固定资产总值７０余万元，...     

服务──环境监测工作的主旋律

服务──环境监测工作的主旋律（大庆石油局环境监测中心站）大庆石油管理局环境监测中心站成立２０年来，不断强化服务意识，紧紧围绕企业生产的发展，以质量控制为核心，为企业服务、为管理服务已成为我们做好环境监测工作的主旋律。１．强化质控管理是做好服务工作的基...     

眉山市环境监测信息系统的设计与应用

针对眉山市环境监测中心站传统纸质化办公工作效率低、统计分析难的现状,为规范环境监测业务,强化质量管理体系,提升环境监测工作管理水平,中心站历时3年时间致力于环境监测信息系统的搭建,该系统涵盖环境监测日常事务、监测业务工作、人员管理、物质和财务管理等环境监测工作环节,是在环境监测传统业务流程的基础上应用信息化的技术的一次革新,有效地提升了眉山市环境监测中心站的信息化能力和管理水平。     

前进中的青海省环境监测中心站

青海省环境监测中心站成立于1984年,隶属于青海省环境保护厅,业务上接受中国环境监测总站指导,属国家环境监测网络一级站。省环境监测中心站现有职168名,其中博士1人、硕士5人、学士33人、高级工程师20人、工程师17人。     

环境空气SO2自动监测仪器常见故障及排除

介绍了盐城市环境监测中心站目前使用的环境空气SO2监测仪器在应用中出现的常见故障及处理.     

湖南、云南、湖北积极引导环保公众参与

（湖南）日前，保护母亲河环保青年志愿者交流活动在湖南举行。湖南省环保厅与省直属机关工委、团省委、省直团工委及省环境监测中心站负责人参加了活动，与环保职院、交通职院、生物机电职院、水利水电职院等省直高职院校的青年环保志愿者进行了交流。     

四川省环境监测总站

正机构概况四川省环境监测总站的前身为四川省环境监测中心站,组建于1977年9月,是全国环境监测网中心组成员单位,为国家一级站,是四川省环境保护厅直属的公益性事业单位。2013年3月四川省机构编制委员会和四川省环境保护厅共同行文,同意四川省环境监测中心站更名为四川省环境监测总站。主要职责四川省环境监测总站是具有技术监督管理职能的社会公益性科技事业单位,是全省环境监测系统的监测技术中心、监测信息数据综合统计中心、监测网络中心和监测技术人员培训中心;为四川省环境保护厅实施环境监督管理提     

“四川省室内环境污染检测中心”成立

近年来 ,室内环境污染问题已成为影响到人民群众切身利益的社会热点问题。为了加强对居室环境污染的监督检测 ,促进我省房地产业和装修市场的规范化管理 ,配合国家即将颁布的《室内环境质量评价标准》的实施 ,经四川省环境保护局研究 ,同意于 11月 12日成立“四川省室内环境污染检测中心” (下称中心 )。该中心由四川省环境监测中心站 (下称省环境监测站 )和四川省辐射环境管理监测中心站 (下称省辐射监测站 )的相关监测力量共同组成。中心的检测业务根据省环境监测站和省辐射监测站的现有业务职能共同承担。四川省室内环境污染检测中心现已…     

环境监测实验室污染控制初探

针对环境监测实验室污染的产生与危害,以攀枝花市环境监测中心站实验室污染治理为实例,对环境监测实验室污染控制的意义、作用、需要解决的问题进行了探讨,并提出了相应对策和建议。     

对环境监测实行科学管理——苏州市环境监测中心站建立健全环境监测质量保证体系

苏州市环境监测中心站建于1978年11月。建站以来,他们不断完善和提高环境监测质量,保证监测数据的准确性、可靠性,科学管理实验室。自1983年起,全面开展了环境监测质量管理,基本形成了一套完整的质量保证体系。     

REGULATORY WATER QUALITY MONITORING: A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE1

ABSTRACT: Regulatory water quality monitoring has evolved to the point where it is a rather complex system encompassing many monitoring purposes and involving many monitoring activities. Lack of a system's perspective of regulatory monitoring hinders the development of effective and efficient monitoring programs to support water quality management. In this paper the regulatory water quality monitoring system is examined in a total systems context. The purposes of regulatory monitoring are reviewed and categorized according to their legal evolution. The activities of regulatory monitoring are categorized and organized into a system which follows the flow of information through the monitoring program. The monitoring purposes and activities are combined to form a monitoring system matrix - a framework within which the total regulatory water quality monitoring system is defined. The matrix, by defining the regulatory monitoring system and clarifying many interactions within the system, provides a basis upon which a more thorough approach to managing, evaluating, and eventually optimizing regulatory monitoring can be developed.     

Survey of state water quality monitoring programs

Budget changes, whether positive or negative, in water quality management agencies often mean a change in resources available for water quality monitoring. Many state agencies are currently facing monitoring budget cuts and, as a result, are reevaluating their monitoring programs. Such evaluations make use of a number of information sources, not the least of which are monitoring activities in other states. This article reports results of a survey of all fifty state water quality monitoring programs. Twenty questions were asked in the general areas of fixed-station monitoring, special studies, and biological monitoring. Each state was contacted by telephone at least twice during the survey. Fixed-station monitoring is conducted by 48 of 50 states. An average of 75 stations per state are sampled, generally on a monthly basis. There is a large variation in the way data are analyzed by the states; water quality indices and plots of concentration or loading over time are the most common methods. All but three states conduct special studies, but only seven repeat the studies on a regular basis. Special studies are generally problem specific as opposed to basin oriented. Biological monitoring is performed by 33 states; however, this is an area in which budget cuts are having a noticeable impact. In some cases, biological monitoring is being completely eliminated or suspended. Macroinvertebrate sampling is performed quarterly to biannualiy by 50% of the states; 75% of the states that sample macroinvertebrates do so annually. Periphyton sampling is performed by 33% of the states. Over 50% of the states are in the process of revising, or have revised, their monitoring program during the past five years. However, only four states had a detailed rationale and operating procedure for the entire monitoring system. Results of the survey are, therefore, averages of existing monitoring programs. Average results do not necessarily represent ideal situations, but do give an indication of how states are coping with their monitoring responsibilities.     

铀元件厂排污河流放射性污染与监测

本文报告了铀元件厂排污河流的放射性监测结果，并就污染水平和监测方法进行讨论。调查表明：采用监测河流底泥或水生物的方法可以提高监测灵敏度。     

Monitoring in adaptive co-management: Toward a learning based approach

The recognition of complexity and uncertainty in natural resource management has lead to the development of a wealth of conceptual frameworks aimed at integrated assessment and complex systems monitoring. Relatively less attention has however been given to methodological approaches that might facilitate learning as part of the monitoring process. This paper reviews the monitoring literature relevant to adaptive co-management, with a focus on the synergies between existing monitoring frameworks, collaborative monitoring approaches and social learning. The paper discusses the role of monitoring in environmental management in general, and the challenges posed by scale and complexity when monitoring in adaptive co-management. Existing conceptual frameworks for monitoring relevant to adaptive co-management are reviewed, as are lessons from experiences with collaborative monitoring. The paper concludes by offering a methodological approach to monitoring that actively seeks to engender reflexive learning as a means to deal with uncertainty in natural resource management.     

生态环境监测及其在我国的发展

生态环境监测是环境监测中一个全新的概念，是环境生态建设的技术保证和支持体系。本文对生态环境监测的基本概念和原则、任务及特点、生态环境指标的建立、生态监别技术和方法、生态变化趋势预测预报等进行了介绍，并结合我国在生态环境监测方面所开展的工作提出今后工作的一些设想和展望。     

浅议污染源水质监测的质量保证

本文从污染源调查、监测方案、布点和采样、样品保存和前处理、监测分析、数据处理和监测报告等方面,讨论污染源水质监测的质量保证。强调质量保证体系应当贯穿于污染源水质监测的全过程。污染源水质监测过程始终都应有质量保证措施,才能获得准确可靠的测定结果。     

四川省自贡市声环境质量监督性监测结果分析与建议

开展了四川省自贡市城市声环境质量监督性抽测工作,进行了历史监测数据核查、仪器设备检查、日常质控情况检查、现场比对监测与监测点位核查,抽测结果显示自贡市声环境质量监测工作在监测数据管理、仪器设备管理、监测点位有效性及监测人员业务素质等方面存在一些问题,提出了加强声环境监测技术贮备和人员培养,及时调整监测点位,加强质量管理等建议。     

固定污染源烟气比对监测的几点思考

固定源烟气对比监测是保证自动监测数据质量的重要手段。但是,有效性审核比对监测过程中存在烟气排放连续监测系统安装不规范、手工监测抗干扰能力较差、烟气预处理效果不稳定及监测点位差异影响监测结果比对等问题。在此基础上,提出了严格规范环境监测点位的布置,针对不同的污染源确定适合的监测技术方法,研发完善的烟气预处理设施以及建立健全的自动监测质量保证体系等解决问题的对策。     

自动监测在桐乡市的应用

自动监测是环境监测的一个重要组成部分。桐乡市从2004年初开始着手建设环境质量自动监测系统,到目前为止,已建成两个水质自动监测站和一个空气自动监测站。投入使用后,积累了大量有效的监测数据,显示了人工监测不可比拟的优势,大大提高了环境保护管理部门的科学决策水平。     

山东省空气质量监测“转让-经营”模式改革的思考与探索

山东省探索开展了空气质量监测"转让-经营"模式改革,在体制上科学划分监测事权,实行"谁考核、谁监测",省级环保部门负责17个设区城市环境质量的监督监测,污染源监督监测下放到市、县级环保部门;在机制上实行政府购买服务,对全省空气质量自动监测站实行"监测设备有偿转让,专业队伍运营维护,专业机构移动比对,环保部门质控考核,政府购买合格数据"的"转让-经营"模式。通过改革,监测数据质量和监测公信力得到进一步提高,有效避免了可能的行政干预,降低了监测成本,引导了环保服务业的发展,可以为其他省、市贯彻落实生态环境监测体制改革和地方监测事权上收工作提供一些参考。