皮带机的一种安全检测装置

介绍磁力式皮带速度检测器的作用、性能和使用效果。     

某厂皮带机扩建安全优化设计

采用本质安全优化技术对皮带机本体进行设计,提高设备寿命,强化设备安全,降低操作维护故障通过优化设计选用变频调速技术控制料量,使系统配置满足工艺要求,综合指标更为合理。     

一种矿山安全自救逃生 装置的研发

矿山开采过程中,由于地质条件、有毒有害气体超限、不按规程操作等都会引起各种危险发生,严重威胁到矿工的生命安全,针对国内现有矿山安全自救逃生装置的现状,设计出了一种结构简单、操作简便、功能多样化的矿山安全自救逃生装置,通过理论研究,可以达到较好的自救逃生的预期效果。     

浅谈防雷击装置安全技术检测

伴随现代高层建筑、电力、电讯装置的发展，以及油库、液化气站等爆炸危险场所的增多，因雷击所造成的事故也日益频繁。如何保证在用的以及新建、改建、扩建项目中的防雷击装置具备良好的性能，能够在防止雷击事故中起到应有的作用，已经成为当前一个至关重要的问题。而要做到这一点，其中十分关键的环节就是对防雷击装置进行安全技术检测．及时发现问题，及时整改。卞文仅就与检测工作相关的一些技术问题进行一般性的探讨。一、标准和规范毫无疑问，检测工作离不开标准和规范。还应当指出，雷电的历史远远超过人类的历史。就防雷击装置而言…     

胶带输送机的安全检测装置

针对胶带输送机存在的不安全隐患,研制出符合现场实际,切实可靠的安全检测装置.     

某厂皮带机扩建安全优化设计

采用本质安全优化技术对皮带机本体进行设计,提高设备寿命,强化设备安全,降低操作维护故障,通过优化设计选用变频调速技术控制料量,使系统配置满足工艺要求,综合指标更为合理。     

胶带输送机的安全检测装置

针对胶带输送机存在的不安全隐患，研制出符合现场实际。切实可靠的安全检测装置。     

一种安全管理模式的探讨

一些企业的安全工作者正在探索一种新的安全管理模式，即以事故为零的目标，“四全”管理为对策，五项标准为基础，七大保证体系为保证的安全管理模式。     

“蛇形”带式输送机转向稳定性研究

“蛇形”带式输送机在转弯过程中,失稳情况十分常见,对其转弯稳定性的研究可以避免生产事故,提高生产效率。根据实际工况中“蛇形”带式输送机的受力情况,得到转弯过程中各小车的运动方程,结合转向油缸对于小车转弯的影响,得到油缸和小车转弯角度之间的关系,建立起转弯过程动力学模型。运用实验设备进行实车实验,利用MATLAB/Simulink软件对“蛇形”带式输送机系统转弯过程进行了仿真分析,研究了“蛇行”带式输送系统在不同转向条件下的工作状态。将实验结果和仿真结果进行对比分析,得出“蛇形”带式输送机转弯的临界条件,为“蛇形”带式输送机稳定域估计提供依据。     

A research agenda for increasing safety belt use in the United States

On November 13-14, 2003, a symposium on high-visibility safety belt use enforcement in Raleigh, NC: (a) celebrated the 10th anniversary of North Carolina's Click It or Ticket program; (b) documented current knowledge regarding safety belt use; (c) proposed strategies to increase use further; and (d) discussed research to support these strategies.     

基于深度学习的输煤皮带故障视觉检测方法研究

为了更好地检测皮带跑偏、撕裂和异物干扰等严重影响皮带安全运行的故障状态,围绕相关问题产生的原因及检测方法开展深入研究,通过对纵/横向裂缝、异物的检测分析、实验,提高基于视觉的检测精度。提出基于Canny边缘检测算法的皮带跑偏检测算法;基于深度学习的横向与纵向撕裂检测,尤其对于裂缝与纵向纹理区分不明显情况,提出一种红光透射的判别方式;基于最小距离分类算法将识别异物转换为分类问题,利用机器学习的方法对样本进行训练并建立无异物阈值,通过提取特征,最后利用最小距离分类算法得到有无异物的结果。研究结果表明:提出的视觉检测系统可以实时高效地检测出输煤皮带常见的3种故障,可进一步保障运输系统安全运行。     

回流式皮带机静电除尘罩除尘效率的试验

为了有效控制皮带机转运点的粉尘污染,研发了一种回流式皮带机静电除尘罩。该除尘罩主要由Ω形极板罩、高压放电极和回流风机等构成,通过调节回流风机的流量,可以使微细粉尘在循环流动中被反复净化。因而研究回流率对除尘效率的影响规律是重要的。试验直接采用实物静电除尘罩,试验粉尘采用中位径为4.496μm的石灰粉,用滤膜称重法测粉尘质量浓度,通过回流风机控制回流量大小进行效率对比试验。结果表明:在给定的外加电压下,回流式皮带机静电除尘罩的除尘效率随回流率增加而提高,当电压大于50 kV,回流率ζ=30%时,除尘效率超过90%,但当回流率ζ30%,除尘效率增加趋缓。当初始粉尘质量浓度为102.34 mg/m~3时,在试验条件下改变回流率和电场强度,排放质量浓度最低可达到5.16 mg/m~3,可实现超净排放。     

室内皮带上煤机除尘系统改造设计

针对某公司热电厂皮带上煤机除尘系统所存在的问题,进行了全面的改造设计,取得了良好的除尘效果。     

Connecticut nighttime safety belt use

Problem

Safety belt use in the United States, as measured over daylight hours, has risen steadily over recent years reaching 80% in 2004. Yet, using the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration's (NHTSA) Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), safety belt use among fatally injured front seat outboard occupants of passenger vehicles was only between 42% and 46% for the years 1999 to 2003. One possible contributing factor is that safety belt use at night, when crash rates are highest, is lower than during the day.

Method

A full statewide nighttime belt use observation survey was conducted in 2004. This survey was conducted simultaneously with Connecticut's annual full statewide daytime belt use survey. Night belt use observations of drivers and passengers are possible using newly available near military grade night vision goggles and handheld infrared spotlights. Both day and goggle-assisted night observations were conducted at 100 observation sites in Connecticut. Procedures for day and night observations were as nearly identical as possible.

Results

The night belt use rate was 6.4 percentage points lower than the day rate (83.0 vs. 76.6). Consistent with belt use among Connecticut fatalities, day versus night differences were greatest in urban areas. There was evidence that day versus night differences were greater before as compared to after a May 2004 belt use enforcement program.     

带式输送机传动滚筒材料结构损伤检测方法的研究

滚筒的损坏会导致皮带倾斜,严重时会导致皮带撕裂,准确检测滚筒的损伤程度能够避免事故发生,并能够提高经济效益。选择带式输送机的滚筒材料作为研究对象,模拟滚筒所处的温度变化环境,对不同损坏程度的滚筒材料进行环境模拟并测试,通过传感器采集频率响应信号,通过主成分分析、异常值分析和微量组分分析方法,只改变温度数据滚筒材料马氏平方距离值相对平缓,控制在0.06×104,真正损坏的马氏平方距离值远远大于临界值,成功去除温度变化对材料频率响应信号的影响,最终找到了能够准确检测滚筒材料的损伤程度的方法。     

Automatic safety belt use in Michigan: A two-year follow-up

The use of automatic safety belts among motorists throughout the state of Michigan was examined as part of a broader direct observation survey to measure compliance with the state's mandatory belt use law. Use of the most common types of automatic belt systems were measured: the nonmotorized detachable three-point lap and shoulder belt system, and the two-belt system with either a motorized shoulder belt and manual lap belt or a nonmotorized shoulder belt and manual lap belt. Belt use rates in vehicles with and without air bags were also compared. A total of 1,367 drivers and front-right passengers were observed with automatic belt systems between June 1 and July 11, 1992. Use of nonmotorized detachable three-point lap and shoulder belt systems was 72.3%. Lap belt use of motorized shoulder and manual lap belt systems was 70.5%. Lap belt use of nonmotorized shoulder and manual lap belt systems was 60.2%. Of all motorized and nonmotorized shoulder belt and manual lap belt systems observed, 94.5% had the shoulder belts connected.     

A direct observation study of nighttime safety belt use in Indiana

INTRODUCTION: Nearly all direct observation studies of safety belt use are conducted exclusively during daylight hours. Recent work has suggested that safety belt use at night may differ from daytime belt use. METHODS: An observational study of nighttime safety belt use, utilizing specialized night vision equipment, was conducted in Indiana surrounding the Click It or Ticket 2006 safety belt mobilization activities. A pre- and a post-mobilization statewide direct observation survey was conducted at night coinciding with daytime safety belt use data collection conducted by the state of Indiana. Daytime and nighttime belt use rates were compared. RESULTS: The comparisons across the mobilization period revealed a significant increase during the day, but a significant decrease at night. Comparisons between daytime and nighttime belt use revealed no overall difference during the pre wave, but a significant difference during the post wave. Finally, many common daytime trends in belt use were also found at night, with the exception of the typical age and seating position effects. DISCUSSION: The mobilization activities had a positive effect on daytime belt use, but no effect on nighttime belt use, likely resulting in the differences between daytime and nighttime belt use observed during the post wave. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: The findings of this study suggest that safety belt mobilizations implemented only during the day do not influence nighttime safety belt use. Changes to how these programs are implemented or additional programs specifically targeting belt use at night should be considered, along with continued monitoring of nighttime belt use.