新形势下如何开展工会工作——以湖南长沙新港有限责任公司为例

工会是企业工会会员和职工合法权益的代表者和维护者,在国民经济发展中起着非常重要的作用.以湖南长沙新港有限责任公司为例,阐述了新形势下开展工会工作的途径,如:服务企业中心工作,广泛开展劳动竞赛；维护职工合法权益,构建和谐劳动关系；积极为职工做好事,解难事；认真开展女职工工作,提高女职工综合素质；加强工会建设,增强工会组织的凝聚力,等等.     

高校思想政治工作创新浅论

社会进入二十一世纪,时代的发展,教育观念的转变,对高校学生的思想政治工作提出了新的机遇和挑战,新的时期,如何做好高校学生思想政治工作,这是摆在思想政治工作者面前的重要课题。笔者认为,创新,是高校思想政治工作的生命所在,既是时代发展、教育向素质教育转轨的客观要求,也是高校思想政治工作本身发展的内在动力。思想政治工作的创新是整体的,只有从思想政治工作的内容、形式和方法上全面创新,才能适应社会发展和人才成长的需要。     

高职院校混合学生系部思想政治工作讨探

介绍了高职院校混合学生系部学生组成、素质和思想政治状况．分析阐述了混合系部学生思想政治工作情况：四级思想政治工作体系力量均较为薄弱,专职思想政治工作人员热情均不是很高,相关教育教学管理部门配合还不很默契。学生思想政治组织队伍工作也成效不大．提出了有针对性地加强思想政治工作的对策：领导高度重视。创建十项有效工作机制;系部主抓主管,实施教管结合、教导结合、教养结合等“一至万思想政治工作思路”：部门协调一致,齐抓共管,把学生思想政治工作贯穿到教育、教学、管理和服务过程中;“两课”教学与辅导员工作相结合;构建科学合理的高职院校思想政治教育工作教育和评估体系;充分发挥党政社团作用;组建“学生自律委员会”,鼓励学生自我管理、自我教育．参7．     

浅谈新形势下如何加强大学生思想政治教育

从加强大学生思想政治教育的重要性、提高教师思想政治素质、新形势下大学生的特点、结合社会新形势及专业特点、加强校园文化建设、正确处理四个关系等六个方面探讨新形势下如何加强大学生思想政治教育，为做好当代大学生的思想政治教育工作提供参考意见．     

对高校思想政治教育队伍建设的几点思考

高校思想政治教育队伍建设是加强高校思想政治教育的组织保证.文章通过分析高校思想政治教育工作的特点,说明了加强高校思想政治教育队伍建设的必要性.并从加强高校思想政治教育队伍的思想建设、提高思想政治教育队伍的整体素质和加强高校思想政治教育队伍建设的科学研究和管理等三方面阐述了如何建设一支高素质的思想政治教育队伍.     

强化鼠标下的“生命线”功能——加强网络思想政治工作，促进大学生学风建设的思考

思想政治工作是其他一切工作的“生命线”,信息时代,网络技术的发展,给青年大学生的思想政治工作提供了崭新的平台,也对传统思想政治工作提出了新的挑战,如何面对形势,因势利导,趋利避害,加快思想政治工作网络化步伐,提高思想政治工作的科技含量,是当前思想政治工作的一个重要课题．参5．     

改进新形势下高校的思想政治工作

高校的宗旨是培养“四有”新人.要实现这一目标,必须牢固树立思想政治工作是一切工作的生命线意识,认清形势,抓住重点,务实作出创新、齐抓共管,才能切实和改进新形势下高校的思想政治工作中.     

浅谈辅导员如何做好大学生思想政治教育工作

大学生的思想政治教育工作是高校永恒的主题.作为大学生思想政治教育工作第一线的组织者和教育者——辅导员,是大学生思想政治教育工作的骨干和主力军.在大学生的思想政治教育管理过程中,辅导员起着至关重要的作用.本文试从四个方面对辅导员如何做好大学生的思想政治教育工作进行了探索.     

做好新时期思想政治工作的探讨

新时期的新形势和新任务，使思想政治工作面临着一系列的新情况、新问题．该文针对新形势下思想政治工作的特点及规律，对做好新时期思想政治工作进行了探讨。参3．     

高职学生思想政治教育的缺失与消弭

随着高职院校的扩招,学生的素质参差不齐,且较之普通高校学生具有自身特点,因此,对他们的思想政治工作要有针对性.然而,目前高职学生的思政工作具有重宣传轻教育、思想政治教育的教育对象调度缺位、思政教育方法低效等缺陷.要提高思想政治教育的实效,就应该营造以人为本的教育环境、设定合理的思想政治教育目标、不断更新高职学生的思想政治教育的内容.     

Transforming conservation science and practice for a postnormal world

We examine issues to consider when reframing conservation science and practice in the context of global change. New framings of the links between ecosystems and society are emerging that are changing peoples’ values and expectations of nature, resulting in plural perspectives on conservation. Reframing conservation for global change can thus be regarded as a stage in the evolving relationship between people and nature rather than some recent trend. New models of how conservation links with transformative adaptation include how decision contexts for conservation can be reframed and integrated with an adaptation pathways approach to create new options for global‐change‐ready conservation. New relationships for conservation science and governance include coproduction of knowledge that supports social learning. New processes for implementing adaptation for conservation outcomes include deliberate practices used to develop new strategies, shift world views, work with conflict, address power and intergenerational equity in decisions, and build consciousness and creativity that empower agents to act. We argue that reframing conservation for global change requires scientists and practitioners to implement approaches unconstrained by discipline and sectoral boundaries, geopolitical polarities, or technical problematization. We consider a stronger focus on inclusive creation of knowledge and the interaction of this knowledge with societal values and rules is likely to result in conservation science and practice that meets the challenges of a postnormal world.     

Landuse experience does qualify for adaptation to climate change

The need to implement sustainable resource management regimes for semi-arid and arid rangelands is acute as non-adapted grazing strategies lead to irreversible environmental problems such as desertification and associated loss of economic support to society. In these sensitive ecosystems, traditional sectoral, disciplinary approaches will not work to attain sustainability: achieving a collective vision of how to attain sustainability requires interactive efforts among disciplines in a more integrated approach.     

Adaptive Decision Rules for the Acquisition of Nature Reserves

Abstract:  Although reserve-design algorithms have shown promise for increasing the efficiency of conservation planning, recent work casts doubt on the usefulness of some of these approaches in practice. Using three data sets that vary widely in size and complexity, we compared various decision rules for acquiring reserve networks over multiyear periods. We explored three factors that are often important in real-world conservation efforts: uncertain availability of sites for acquisition, degradation of sites, and overall budget constraints. We evaluated the relative strengths and weaknesses of existing optimal and heuristic decision rules and developed a new set of adaptive decision rules that combine the strengths of existing optimal and heuristic approaches. All three of the new adaptive rules performed better than the existing rules we tested under virtually all scenarios of site availability, site degradation, and budget constraints. Moreover, the adaptive rules required no additional data beyond what was readily available and were relatively easy to compute.     

Designing Climate-Smart Conservation: Guidance and Case Studies

Abstract:  To be successful, conservation practitioners and resource managers must fully integrate the effects of climate change into all planning projects. Some conservation practitioners are beginning to develop, test, and implement new approaches that are designed to deal with climate change. We devised four basic tenets that are essential in climate-change adaptation for conservation: protect adequate and appropriate space, reduce nonclimate stresses, use adaptive management to implement and test climate-change adaptation strategies, and work to reduce the rate and extent of climate change to reduce overall risk. To illustrate how this approach applies in the real world, we explored case studies of coral reefs in the Florida Keys; mangrove forests in Fiji, Tanzania, and Cameroon; sea-level rise and sea turtles in the Caribbean; tigers in the Sundarbans of India; and national planning in Madagascar. Through implementation of these tenets conservation efforts in each of these regions can be made more robust in the face of climate change. Although these approaches require reconsidering some traditional approaches to conservation, this new paradigm is technologically, economically, and intellectually feasible.     

新型污染物及其生态和环境健康效应

近年来,随着现代分析手段的改进和发展,各种污染物检测能力的提高,以及新的毒作用模式的发现、新合成化合物的制造和使用等,一些物质成为广受国内外关注的新型污染物.新型污染物已在世界范围内对环境和生态系统造成了污染,对生态系统中包括人类在内的各种生物均构成了潜在的危害.目前,人们关注较多的新型污染物主要有全氟有机化合物、人用与兽用药物、饮用水消毒副产物、遮光剂/滤紫外线剂、人造纳米材料、汽油添加剂、溴化阻燃剂等.论文在总结国内外相关研究基础上,对一些重点新型污染物的生态效应及其潜在健康影响进行了简要综述,为我国开展这方面的研究提供了一定的参考.     

Opportunities for better use of collective action theory in research and governance for invasive species management

Controlling invasive species presents a public-good dilemma. Although environmental, social, and economic benefits of control accrue to society, costs are borne by only a few individuals and organizations. For decades, policy makers have used incentives and sanctions to encourage or coerce individual actors to contribute to the public good, with limited success. Diverse, subnational efforts to collectively manage invasive plants, insects, and animals provide effective alternatives to traditional command-and-control approaches. Despite this work, there has been little systematic evaluation of collective efforts to determine whether there are consistent principles underpinning success. We reviewed 32 studies to identify the extent to which collective-action theories from related agricultural and environmental fields explain collaborative invasive species management approaches; describe and differentiate emergent invasive species collective-action efforts; and provide guidance on how to enable more collaborative approaches to invasive species management. We identified 4 types of collective action aimed at invasive species—externally led, community led, comanaged, and organizational coalitions—that provide blueprints for future invasive species management. Existing collective-action theories could explain the importance attributed to developing shared knowledge of the social-ecological system and the need for social capital. Yet, collection action on invasive species requires different types of monitoring, sanctions, and boundary definitions. We argue that future government policies can benefit from establishing flexible boundaries that encourage social learning and enable colocated individuals and organizations to identify common goals, pool resources, and coordinate efforts.     

An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations

In a world of shrinking habitats and increasing competition for natural resources, potentially dangerous predators bring the challenges of coexisting with wildlife sharply into focus. Through interdisciplinary collaboration among authors trained in the humanities, social sciences, and natural sciences, we reviewed current approaches to mitigating adverse human–predator encounters and devised a vision for future approaches to understanding and mitigating such encounters. Limitations to current approaches to mitigation include too much focus on negative impacts; oversimplified equating of levels of damage with levels of conflict; and unsuccessful technical fixes resulting from failure to engage locals, address hidden costs, or understand cultural (nonscientific) explanations of the causality of attacks. An emerging interdisciplinary literature suggests that to better frame and successfully mitigate negative human–predator relations conservation professionals need to consider dispensing with conflict as the dominant framework for thinking about human–predator encounters; work out what conflicts are really about (they may be human–human conflicts); unravel the historical contexts of particular conflicts; and explore different cultural ways of thinking about animals. The idea of cosmopolitan natures may help conservation professionals think more clearly about human–predator relations in both local and global context. These new perspectives for future research practice include a recommendation for focused interdisciplinary research and the use of new approaches, including human‐animal geography, multispecies ethnography, and approaches from the environmental humanities notably environmental history. Managers should think carefully about how they engage with local cultural beliefs about wildlife, work with all parties to agree on what constitutes good evidence, develop processes and methods to mitigate conflicts, and decide how to monitor and evaluate these. Demand for immediate solutions that benefit both conservation and development favors dispute resolution and technical fixes, which obscures important underlying drivers of conflicts. If these drivers are not considered, well‐intentioned efforts focused on human–wildlife conflicts will fail.     

A methodological approach to develop “contaminant migration–population effects” models

The main aim of the present work is to discuss the methodological approaches that underpin the “contaminant migration–population effects” models for the evaluation of the detriment to populations of moving organisms in environmental systems with spatial and time dependent pollution levels. A technique to couple the equations controlling the population dynamics and the pollutant dispersion is described and discussed. The domain of application and the limitations of the methodology are analysed and illustrated by some examples. Possible alternative approaches are briefly presented.     

生态食品开发的新思路

本文着重介绍了生态农业和生态食品的概念,阐述了生态食品的标志,探讨了生态食品开发的必要性、可行性,并对我国生态食品的开发提出了一些新的思路.