锂离子电池组热失控蔓延热传递机制的影响研究

分析通风和电池组数量对电池组热失控发展蔓延热传递机制的影响.选择荷电状态(SOC)为100％的镍钴锰(NCM523)三元锂离子动力电池组作为研究对象,改变电池组底部外加热源的热流量和加热时间,利用多物理场仿真软件COMSOL,进行热滥用导致不同风速通风环境和不同电池数量电池组热失控过程的模拟.结果表明:随着风速不断增大...     

Lower explosion limit of the vented gases from Li-ion batteries thermal runaway in high temperature condition

The thermal runaway of lithium-ion battery (or Li-ion battery, LIB) results in scrap of battery and fire, with the toxic and flammable gases generated. In this work, a self-made device was to collect gases from LIB thermal runaway, when the batteries were under different states of charge (SOC), temperatures of the environment and powers of external heating. Three samples of the collected gases were analyzed to get the results of the composition and content by chromatography-mass spectrometry system (GC-MS). The lower explosion limits (LELs) of the gases was tested by FRTA explosion limit instrument. And then the LEL of three analyzed samples whose composition and content were known by GC-MS were calculated via theoretical formulas. The calculated LELs were compared with those of the instrument test. The errors of the two results of three samples are 2.1%, 1.9%, and 0.4%. The Le Chatelier Formula and empirical formula provide a way to evaluate the LEL of the battery runaway gas more quickly.     

不同外热功率下18650锂离子电池热失控特性*

为探究不同外热功率（220,170,120,70 W）下锂离子电池的热失控特性,采用动压变温实验舱作为燃爆实验舱,并利用量热仪和ISO-9705烟气分析仪监测特征参数,对荷电状态（SOC）为100%的18650型锂离子电池进行高温热失控实验。结果表明:在不同的外热功率条件下,锂离子电池进入热失控的过程呈现出相似的趋势,但是各阶段的特性却存在差异。池体表面中心温度、HRR,THR和耗氧量均随外热功率的降低而降低。高外热功率下燃爆响应时间点明显提前,池体温度更高,220 W外热功率下,燃爆响时间点为176 s,池体温度为720.6 ℃,比70 W时提前366 s,高210.03 ℃,可见高外热功率时,电池热危害性更高。热解烟气CO的峰值体积百分比浓度随着外热功率的降低而升高,而CxHy的峰值质量百分比浓度降低,,CO2的峰值体积百分比浓度降低。在70 W外热功率时,CO峰值体积百分比浓度高达0.322%,220 W时CO峰值体积百分比浓度仅为0.165%,说明低外热功率时,电池毒危害性更高。     

锂离子电池热解气体爆炸极限测定及其危险性分析

为定量研究锂离子电池热失控的危险性,利用锂离子电池在滥用条件下释放气体的种类及体积分数,计算锂离子电池热解气体爆炸极限并研究锂电池荷电状态对热解气体爆炸极限的影响。结果表明:在一定热失控条件下锂离子电池荷电状态为100%时其热解气爆炸下限为6.22%,上限为38.4%,在相同热失控条件下,锂离子电池热解气体的爆炸极限范围随着荷电状态的升高而增大,锂电池的荷电状态对热解气体的爆炸上限影响较大而对爆炸下限影响较小。在相似条件下,锂离子电池热解气体的爆炸极限范围比普通烃类气体大,一旦锂电池发生热失控会对锂离子电池运输造成潜在威胁。     

航空压力环境对锂离子电池热解气体爆炸极限影响*

针对航空锂离子电池热失控释放气体安全性研究不足的问题,采用气体拉曼光谱技术、气相色谱仪(Gas Chromatography,GC)和质谱(Mass Spectroscopy,MS)耦合来探究压力和荷电状态(State of Charge,SOC)对锂离子电池早期故障气体类型、气体动态演变及气体潜在危险性等特征的影响规律,同时综合考虑压力、电压和电池温度等多种因素分析锂离子电池热失控危害。研究结果表明:电池SOC越高且环境压力越低,电池越早触发热失控,爆炸极限越宽,其中30 kPa下100%SOC电池热解气体爆炸极限为8.01%~53.35%;SOC和环境压力越高,电池热失控越危险,释放的气体体积越多;CO,CO2,PF3,C2H4及电解液（C3H6O2、C3H6O3、C4H8O2）等气体可作为航空锂离子电池早期故障诊断特征。研究结果对保障锂离子电池在航空领域的安全运输及应用具有重要意义。     

不同外热部位下18650型锂离子电池热失控研究

为探究不同外热部位对18650型锂离子电池热失控特性的影响,通过自主设计的试验平台对电荷量为100%的18650型锂离子电池开展不同外热部位下热失控试验,探讨不同部位外热源对电池热失控行为过程、热失控响应时间、温度特性、电池破裂部位的影响。结果表明:在相同热源功率条件下,外热源位置对电池热失控过程中初爆与二次燃爆间的时间间隔存在影响,顶部加热时安全阀打开瞬间便发生二次燃爆,底部和中部加热工况下,时间间隔分别延迟至18 s和40 s;中部加热时池体温升速率最慢,为0.873℃/s,分别为顶部和底部加热时的77.5%和77.8%;中部加热时热失控响应时间最长达290 s,顶部和底部加热时分别缩短12.4%和30.0%;顶部和底部加热时,热失控破裂部位集中于顶部"褶皱处"和底部防爆阀,但在中部加热工况下,电池发生破裂部位的随机性增加,其外壳破坏程度也有增加。     

相变材料填充率影响锂电池组热失控传播特性的实验研究

复合相变材料(PCM)应用于锂电池组的热管理是当前研究的热点。然而,PCM对锂电池组热失控传播特性的影响规律仍不甚明晰。实验研究了不同PCM填充率对锂电池组的影响,分析其热失控触发时间、最高温度、质量损失和热释放速率等参数变化规律。结果发现,添加PCM后,电池表面温度、CO和SO₂浓度均出现了不同程度的降低,但对热释放速率没有明显的影响。PCM填充率为0%和10%的电池组均发生了热失控传播,而30%、50%、100%的PCM填充率能有效阻隔热失控传播的发生。     

放电条件下锂离子电池热行为的研究

锂离子电池在生产生活中扮演着重要角色,为了对其热性能有更全面的了解,对锂离子电池放电条件下的热行为进行了探究。通过采集表面温度、电压、热释放速率等参数后对比发现,在可逆热与不可逆热的作用下,电池放电过程中存在明显的升温。此外,放电处理将导致电池出现更为明显的升温情况,更早发生热失控。最后,经过放电处理的锂电池在外加热源作用进而发生失控的实验过程中有着更剧烈的热失控行为,并最终释放较少的热量。     

不同环境体系下锂离子电池热失控特性实验研究

针对锂离子电池热失控引发的航空运输安全问题,自主设计并搭建锂离子电池热失控灾害演化及危险性分析实验平台。在敞开和密封环境体系下,对电加热触发荷电量(State of Charge,SOC)为0%、50%和100%的18650型锂离子电池热失控规律进行了实验研究。观察单体锂离子电池在敞开和密封体系中的热失控现象,并记录单体锂离子电池热失控时间、温度峰值及相应的温度变化。数据结果显示,相比敞开体系,密封体系有效的延缓了锂离子电池发生热失控的时间,并降低了锂离子热失控时释放的能量,为锂离子电池的航空运输安全性研究提供了理论依据和工程技术参考。     

低压环境下不同三元圆柱锂电池热失控危险特性对比研究

为研究21700和18650新旧2型多用途锂离子电池在航空运输低压环境下的热失控特性差异,采用动压变温实验舱搭建实验平台开展实验。将实验环境压力设定为飞机巡航时的环境压力30 kPa,对比常压101 kPa,使用外部热源加热的方式触发锂电池热失控,利用热传播引发相邻电池热失控,分别从热失控温度变化特性、热释放速率和热解气体组分浓度变化进行分析。研究结果表明:能量密度更高的21700电池热失控峰值温度更高,高温危险性要高于18650电池,但触发热失控所需的热量更多,电池间热传播时间会延长;低压环境有利于降低锂电池热失控燃爆峰值温度,减小燃爆热释放速率,但会产生更多CxHy和CO等具有燃爆性的热解气体,可能会在有限空间内与氧气混合引起二次燃爆。     

受限空间环境压力对三元锂离子电池热失控影响*

为研究三元锂离子电池在空运低压环境中的安全性,通过自主设计搭建的封闭式变压实验舱开展相关实验,对不同荷电状态（SOC）下的三元锂离子电池在不同压力环境（101,80,60,40 kPa）下的热失控特性进行研究,采集电池热失控过程中的温度以及实验舱内的压力变化,并对热失控后实验舱内的气体成分进行分析。结果表明:三元锂离子电池热稳定性随着SOC的升高而下降,常压下100%SOC的电池热失控温度可达650.8 ℃,初始环境压力越低,相同SOC的电池热失控最高温度越低。随着环境压力的降低,相同SOC的电池在热失控后会生成更多CO,且电解液占比升高。研究结果可为锂离子电池空运安全性研究提供理论依据。     

常压及低压下锂电池热失控随数量变化特性

为明确在地面常压环境和商用飞机巡航高度低气压环境下锂电池热失控火灾危险特性随电池数量的变化关系,分别于95 kPa地面常压环境和20 kPa低压环境下,开展不同电池数量梯度的热失控试验,测量热释放速率,总热释放量,烟气温度,CO、CO2和碳氢等气体的实时体积分数.结果表明:最高热释放速率和总热释放量与电池数量均呈幂函数...     

基于火探管式的锂离子电池灭火技术研究

为研究锂离子电池灭火方案,基于火探管灭火技术同时利用新型清洁灭火剂Novec 1230,组装成火探管灭火系统。在灭火测试平台上以功率为200 W的电热管作为外热源引发单电池或电池模组热失控,通过改变火探管的布置位置,记录相应的灭火行为以及灭火效率,并对实验结果进行了分析。研究结果表明,当火探管灭火系统直接布置在电池正上方时,在起火后的5.6s内控制火情;随着灭火剂用量增加可以显著降低体系温度,防止电池复燃以及连锁热失控现象发生;火探管有效覆盖区域外的失控电池作为热源将继续加热临近电池,引发连锁热失控,造成灭火系统失效;根据电池热失控后的燃烧行为以及传热行为,提出相应的火探管灭火系统复合方案。     

二叔丁基过氧化物的热失控动力学研究

为研究二叔丁基过氧化物(DTBP)热失控危险性,利用C600微量量热仪对DTBP热分解动力学进行试验研究,测定DTBP在不同升温速率下的起始放热温度和分解热,分别用非等转化率法和等转化率法得到DTBP热分解反应的动力学参数。用非等转化率法确定反应的最佳反应级数为1,相应的活化能分别为137.75、132.60、128.61和122.93 kJ/mol,指前因子分别为8.82×1012、6.69×1012、2.06×1012和3.89×10111/s。用等转化率法确定的活化能范围为102～138 kJ/mol,并拟合出活化能与转化率的关系曲线。结合计算出的动力学参数,通过对DTBP分解机理的分析,可以推断其具有热失控危险性。     

Diphenylmethane diisocyanate self-polymerization: Thermal hazard evaluation and proof of runaway reaction in gram scale

Thermal analysis by differential scanning calorimetry and thermogravimetric/differential thermal analysis mass spectrometry, adiabatic calorimetry, a gram-scale heating test, and infrared spectroscopy were performed to evaluate the thermal hazards of diphenylmethane diisocyanate (MDI) and prove the occurrence of a runaway reaction. The self-polymerization of MDI was found to occur at about 340 °C under rapid heating conditions. Carbon dioxide was eliminated and heat was generated to allow polymerization. Under adiabatic and closed conditions, the runaway reaction of MDI can begin at least from 220 °C. Besides it is highly probable that the runaway reaction of MDI can begin from a lower temperature in an actual process scale. More heat was generated than in the previous case and the pressure rose rapidly. A closed 2-mm-thick glass vessel exploded because of the runaway reaction of MDI even if the temperature was lower than 300 °C. Therefore, MDI could cause fatal runaway reactions below 300 °C, where MDI had been assumed to self-polymerize by eliminating carbon dioxide previously.     

Internal short circuit and accelerated rate calorimetry tests of lithium-ion cells: Considerations for methane-air intrinsic safety and explosion proof/flameproof protection methods

Researchers with the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) studied the potential for lithium-ion cell thermal runaway from an internal short circuit in equipment for use in underground coal mines. In this third phase of the study, researchers compared plastic wedge crush-induced internal short circuit tests of selected lithium-ion cells within methane (CH₄)-air mixtures with accelerated rate calorimetry tests of similar cells. Plastic wedge crush test results with metal oxide lithium-ion cells extracted from intrinsically safe evaluated equipment were mixed, with one cell model igniting the chamber atmosphere while another cell model did not. The two cells models exhibited different internal short circuit behaviors. A lithium iron phosphate (LiFePO₄) cell model was tolerant to crush-induced internal short circuits within CH₄-air, tested under manufacturer recommended charging conditions. Accelerating rate calorimetry tests with similar cells within a nitrogen purged 353-mL chamber produced ignitions that exceeded explosion proof and flameproof enclosure minimum internal pressure design criteria. Ignition pressures within a 20-L chamber with 6.5% CH₄-air were relatively low, with much larger head space volume and less adiabatic test conditions. The literature indicates that sizeable lithium thionyl chloride (LiSOCl₂) primary (non rechargeable) cell ignitions can be especially violent and toxic. Because ignition of an explosive atmosphere is expected within explosion proof or flameproof enclosures, there is a need to consider the potential for an internal explosive atmosphere ignition in combination with a lithium or lithium-ion battery thermal runaway process, and the resulting effects on the enclosure.     

棉布厚度对辐射式电暖器引燃能力影响研究

实验研究了棉布厚度对辐射式电暖器的引燃能力影响情况。实验用电暖器上加热管向外辐射热通量占电器功率之间的比例(辐射率η值)为65%。辐射式电暖器可以使棉布发生阴燃燃烧,当单面工作功率为400 W的电暖器紧贴棉布且全过程全覆盖的前提下棉布阴燃的临界厚度在0.18 mm～0.48 mm之间,当棉布厚度超过0.48 mm时将发生阴燃,但薄棉布通常难以直接发生有焰燃烧。对于用棉布开始阴燃时间表征的电暖器引燃能力,随着棉布厚度的增大,电暖器对棉布的引燃能力将减弱。     

锂离子电池火灾危险性研究

为解决锂离子电池在应用、运输中的火灾安全问题,并为锂离子电池火灾扑灭技术研究提供支撑,以钴酸锂18650型及大容量的聚合物锂离子电池为研究对象,通过开展针刺、短路、耐热等滥用试验寻求锂离子电池及电池组引发火灾的条件和因素。通过开展燃烧试验,分析锂离子电池的燃烧特点。试验结果表明:正极材料为钴酸锂的18650型锂离子电池自燃温度约为170℃,大容量的聚合物锂离子电池组在内部短路后,可能发生燃烧甚至轰燃现象且燃烧残留物温度高,易引发火灾;18650型锂离子电池在短路条件下会长时间持续放热,存在引发火灾的可能;单只锂离子电池燃烧后能够引燃相邻的电池,从而形成电池组的连锁燃烧反应。     

热力管加热桥面抗冰融冰试验研究

为了研究热力管加热桥面抗冰融冰对于公路交通安全的影响,制作了尺寸为600 mm×600 mm×380 mm的桥梁试件,在人工环境室对热力管融冰进行了模型试验。结果表明:试件上表面温升速率和融冰时间取决于热力管间距、隔热层、风速、环境温度和热力管外表面温度。在相同工况条件下,100 mm间距的热力管融冰能力要大于150 mm间距的热力管,无隔热层时,100 mm间距热力管向上传递的热量占总加热量的13.4%,融冰时间为211 min;150 mm间距热力管向上传递的热量占总加热量的18.3%,融冰时间为271 min。在热力管层下面铺设厚度为2 mm、导热系数为0.062 W/（m· K）的隔热材料后,100 mm间距热力管向上传递的热量占总加热量的46.9%,融冰时间为175 min;150 mm间距热力管向上传递的热量占总加热量的51.9%,融冰时间为161 min。热力管层铺设隔热材料可有效阻止热量向下传递,从而缩短融冰时间。     

A review of hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries

Primary lithium batteries contain hazardous materials such as lithium metal and flammable solvents, which can lead to exothermic activity and runaway reactions above a defined temperature. Lithium-ion batteries operating outside the safe envelope can also lead to formation of lithium metal and thermal runaway. Despite protection by battery safety mechanisms, fires originating from primary lithium and lithium-ion batteries are a relatively frequent occurrence.This paper reviews the hazards associated with primary lithium and lithium-ion cells, with an emphasis on the role played by chemistry at individual cell level. Safety mechanisms to prevent the occurrence and limit the consequences of incidents are reviewed, together with safety tests to monitor compliance with battery safety regulations and standards. Incident information from news accounts and open literature sources are reviewed to extract causal information.It is concluded that the potential severity of incidents during storage, transport and recycling of waste batteries can be significantly higher than in end-use applications. Safe storage, packaging and labelling practices, as well as communication among the parties involved, are essential to ensure safety across the battery lifecycle. It is recommended that a database of lithium battery incidents would be valuable to improve the evidence base for informing accident prevention measures.