Quantitative Appraisement on Ecological Cawing Capacity in Coastal Rapid Developing Region of Hainan Province

The ecological carrying capacity, an important indica-tor to evaluate the sustainable development of the ecosystem, means the potential ability of the natural ecosystem to carry so-cioeconomic development while the ecosystem is healthy. It is limited by the carrying capacity of natural resources and environ-merit and the elasticity of the ecosystem. It will be greatly signifi-cant to study the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province, the first ecological province admitted by the State Environmental Protection Administration in China. Not only is the natural eco-system reflected, but also the effects of human activities are em-phasized by integrating the ecosystem health analysis into the ecological carrying capacity research. The research results, using the Factor Analysis tools of software SPSS, indicate that the eco-logical carrying capacity of Hainan Province fluctuated obviously from 1996 to 2005. The level of the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province was relatively high in 1996, and reached into trough from 1997 to 1999. It has steadily ascended to be above the middle level since the 21st century. The results also show that policy factors, especially the implementation of the 'Ecological Province' strategy, were important driving forces to influence the ecological carrying capacity. With the population rapidly increas-ing, the land and water resources per capita have decreased quickly. The amount of the ecological carrying capacity was pro-rooted remarkably by socioeconomic development especially economic growth and technology applications. All of these will provide useful suggestions to establish and enact regional devel-opment policies, especially for protecting and reconstructing the ecology and environment of Hainan Province.     

Quantitative Appraisement on Ecological Carrying Capacity in Coastal Rapid Developing Region of Hainan Province

The ecological carrying capacity, an important indicator to evaluate the sustainable development of the ecosystem, means the potential ability of the natural ecosystem to carry socioeconomic development while the ecosystem is healthy. It is limited by the carrying capacity of natural resources and environment and the elasticity of the ecosystem. It will be greatly significant to study the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province, the first ecological province admitted by the State Environmental Protection Administration in China. Not only is the natural ecosystem reflected, but also the effects of human activities are emphasized by integrating the ecosystem health analysis into the ecological carrying capacity research. The research results, using the Factor Analysis tools of software SPSS, indicate that the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province fluctuated obviously from 1996 to 2005. The level of the ecological carrying capacity of Hainan Province was relatively high in 1996, and reached into trough from 1997 to 1999. It has steadily ascended to be above the middle level since the 21st century. The results also show that policy factors, especially the implementation of the ＇Ecological Province＇ strategy, were important driving forces to influence the ecological carrying capacity. With the population rapidly increasing, the land and water resources per capita have decreased quickly. The amount of the ecological carrying capacity was promoted remarkably by socioeconomic development especially economic growth and technology applications. All of these will provide useful suggestions to establish and enact regional development policies, especially for protecting and reconstructing the ecology and environment of Hainan Province.     

Climate capacity:the measurement for adaptation to climate change

This article proposed the concept of"climate capacity"as a way of measuring human’s adaptiveness to climate change.This article also focused on the related concepts like ecological carrying capacity,water resources carrying capacity,land carrying capacity as well as population carrying capacity.The concept of climate capacity was articulated against a background of global climate and environmental change.Essentially,China’s efforts to adapt to climate change was a matter of improving climate capacity,which is the ecosystem as well as the frequency,the intensity and the scale of human’s social activities that the climatic resources of a particular geographic area were supposed to support.The climate capacity has two components.One is the natural climate capacity,which includes temperature,sunlight,precipitation,extreme climatic events,etc.The other is the derived climate capacity,which includes water resources,land resources,ecological systems,climatic risks,etc.The climate capacity can be developed or be transferred between regions by taking engineering,technology or regime-based adaptive measures.However,these adaptive measures must be implemented under the principle of economic rationalism,ecological integrity,climate protection,and social justice.It is expected that by combining the climate capacity and its threshold value with the assessment of climate change risks,we are able to predict the optimal population carrying capacity and the scale of socioeconomic development,and furthermore,provide policy support for the socioeconomic development strategy and adaptive planning.In the regions with high climate capacity,there is a symbiotic relationship between adaptation and socioeconomic development.But,in the regions with limited climate capacity,irrational development may further damage the environment.Taking the Yangtze River delta,a region with high climate capacity,and a region of Ningxia,a region with limited climate capacity,as illustrative examples,the authors of this article analyzed the policy implications of climate capacity and further made suggestions on the problems of capacitylimited adaptation and development-driven adaptation.This article argued that the concept of climate capacity can not only be used as an analytical instrument of climate change economics,but also it can provide research support for planning regional adaptation and development with climate change impact and risk assessments.     

云南省水资源承载力评价与时空分布特征研究

水资源承载力是衡量一个地区社会经济发展潜力的重要方面。选取水资源、社会、经济和生态环境评价指标,构建了区域水资源承载力综合评价模型;通过分析经济压力指数、人口压力指数、承载压力指数及协调指数,对云南省水资源的承载能力和利用状况进行评价,并探讨了其时空分布特征。结果表明：（1）云南省水资源与生产力布局、人口分布不协调,滇中地区经济相对发达,人口数量大,而水资源量较少,多属于轻度超载或濒临超载地区;（2）随着人口增加和经济发展,区域内水资源承载压力逐渐增大,如滇东北地区的昭通市由水资源承载适宜地区转变为水资源濒临超载地区,而滇西部地区的德宏市水资源承载力由承载盈余变为承载适宜;（3）从整体上看,目前云南省水资源利用率较低,工程性缺水问题较为突出。未来水利工程尤其是滇中引水等的建设及运行,将有效缓解水资源超载问题     

南京市快速城市化过程中人均生态足迹的动态变化与预测研究

基于《南京统计年鉴》数据,应用生态足迹分析方法,计算了南京市1992～2002年人均生态足迹、人均生态承载力和生态赤字,并对过去11年生态足迹各项指标及其动态变化进行了分析。结果显示,南京市人均生态足迹明显高于江苏省平均水平,更是高于全国水平的2倍,已超过了2.0 hm2/人的全球生态阈值,人均生态承载力明显偏低,全市生态赤字高达自身面积的20倍,表明南京市资源环境形势不容乐观,区域可持续发展面临严峻挑战。随着城市化、工业化和社会经济的迅速发展,过去11年间南京市呈现人均生态足迹逐年升高、人均生态承载力不断降低的动态趋势。鉴于此,必须实施资源节约高效、生态环境友好、控制人口负荷等重大战略举措,实现快速城市化、工业化背景下的区域可持续发展。其次利用灰色模型预测了2003～2005年的人均生态足迹和生态承载力,预测精度较好。     

西昌市生态空间占用及其生态系统安全评估

生态系统安全的概念应该与人类的可持续发展联系在一起,其安全的目标在于为人类的生存和发展提供持续和良好的生态服务功能,在这一意义上,生态安全就是生态系统的可持续性。生态系统安全是新兴的生态系统管理学概念,是新的环境管理和生态系统管理目标。利用生态占用分析方法,对西昌市整个生态系统的生态盈亏和生态系统安全进行评估,得出西昌市目前人均生态赤字0.6 hm2和生态安全受到挑战的结论。并进行了生态占用的敏感性分析：能源资源消耗降低10%,人均生态赤字降低5.32%;产量因子提高10%,人均生态赤字降低14.01%;能源消耗减低10%,同时产量因子提高10%,人均生态空间赤字减少降低19.33%。指出了能源循环利用、资源节约、技术革新和单位面积资源增值等为主要特征的生态产业发展对生态系统保育的意义和效应。     

基于BP-ANN的生态安全预警研究——以苏州市为例

对区域生态安全进行预警研究，有助于提升区域可持续发展能力。结合预警理论，通过构建生态安全预警指标体系，运用超载度模型及Matlab支持下的BP人工神经网络（BP ANN）对经济快速发展的苏州市1996～2015年生态安全进行预警分析。研究表明：①BP ANN模拟效果较好，将其用于生态安全预警研究是可行的；②1996~2007年苏州市生态系统整体处于临界安全的中警状态，其超载水平经历了“加重 稳定 缓解”的变化过程，虽然今后几年内人类支持能力将持续提高，系统超载水平将波动性下降，但资源和环境问题仍不容乐观。在今后的发展中需要发挥政府主导性作用，从环境保护与治理、科技创新、产业转型、资源管理及人口调控机制等方面制定对策措施。〖     

基于相对承载力的区域可持续发展研究——以江苏省为例

采用相对承载力的研究思路和计算方法,分析了1996～2005年相对土地资源承载力、相对经济负载力和综合承载力及其演化过程,在此基础上分析了江苏省可持续发展存在的问题,提出了可持续发展的对策。结果表明：①综合承载力从1996～2005年一直处于富余状态,并且有逐年上升的趋势。相对经济负载力一直处于富余状态,而相对土地资源承载力却始终处于超载状态;相对经济负载力对综合承载力的贡献大于相对土地资源承载力,相对经济负载力的提高是综合承载力快速提高的原因。②区域富余状态差异明显,苏南地区处于极度,苏中地区处于轻度,而苏北地区处于超载。③相对土地资源承载力与相对经济负载力的不协调发展是江苏省可持续发展战略中需要重点解决的问题。④大力发展经济、合理利用资源、促进区域协调发展是实现可持续发展的关键。     

基于本地生态足迹模型的浙江省可持续发展评价

生态足迹法是一种评估区域可持续发展程度和人类对自然资源利用情况的工具。通过对一般生态足迹法的调整,运用本地生态足迹模型,对浙江省本地生态足迹的时空特性和环境生态的潜在危险性进行了分析和评价。结果表明：(1)2006年浙江省人均本地生态足迹 2.763 8 hm2,人均生态承载力 0.437 9 hm2,人均本地生态赤字 2.325 9 hm2;(2)1991～2006年浙江省的本地生态足迹都超过了生态承载力,社会经济发展表现出环境生态的不可持续性;(3)2005年浙江省11个城市的本地生态足迹和生态承载力表现出一定的差异;(4)浙江全省生态足迹强度指数从1991年的2078上升到2006年的5952,16年间生态强度指数增大了近3倍,单位可承载面积内的实际生态压力越来越大,环境生态的潜在危险性有扩大之势.     

贵州省水资源承载力的空间地域差异

水资源承载力是一个国家或地区可持续发展过程中各种自然资源承载力的重要组成部分,对一个国家或地区综合的发展和发展规模有至关重要的影响。由于水资源承载力是涉及到人口、社会经济发展以及资源环境在内的复杂巨系统,通过利用综合多种因素的状态空间法,从综合、宏观的角度来描述研究区域现实的承载状况,并对其进行定量化表示和分析。以贵州省为例,根据其具体情况,选取了9个指标构成评价指标体系,并对各指标运用反映客观赋权的熵值法进行权重的确定,然后通过状态空间法求算出贵州省现实的水资源承载状态值及其理想状态值。计算结果表明,贵州省目前的水资源承载状况总体上处于超载状态,但不同的地区又有所差异,表现出一定的空间地域性。根据贵州省水资源承载的现状值与理想值的比较,把整个贵州省水资源承载力划分为3种类型区：严重超载区、满载区及可载区。计算结果符合贵州省水资源实际情况,对贵州省水资源的可持续利用具有一定的现实指导意义。     

恩施地区生态足迹和生态承载力评价

以恩施地区2010年统计数据为依据,对其2010年的生态足迹、生态承载力、生态盈余进行计算和分析,并将生态足迹、生态承载力、生态盈余和万元GDP生态足迹分别与恩施地区贫困村分布密度进行空间耦合。研究表明：（1）恩施地区人均生态盈余为0467 hm2,人均生态承载力为0947 1 hm2,人均生态足迹为048 hm2;（2）贫困村分布密度最高的来凤县、建始县人均生态盈余很少,而贫困村分布密度最低的利川市、咸丰县、宣恩县、鹤峰县,人均生态足迹最高和最低的县分别是咸丰县、宣恩县,鹤峰县的生态承载力最高,人均生态盈余最高的是宣恩县、鹤峰县,万元GDP生态足迹最高和最低的分别是利川市,巴东县;（3）通过生态足迹的研究,提出了恩施贫困地区需放大生态比较优势,〖JP2〗因地制宜,努力将生态盈余转化为直接的经济增长,使之能够有效的帮助贫困地区脱贫致富     

滇池流域生态承载力及系统耦合效应剖析

利用ENVI4.8和Arcgis9.3软件对2001~2010年的遥感影像数据进行处理和分析,计算得出各年份的生态承载力。结合相关年份的社会经济数据,同时根据滇池流域的实际情况提取18个分析指标,运用相关分析和回归分析方法,对滇池流域生态承载力以及其与生态环境系统、资源环境系统、社会经济系统3个子系统要素的耦合关系进行分析。结果表明:(1)2001~2010年滇池流域的总生态承载力和人均生态承载力呈快速下降趋势,降幅达37.3%;耕地生态承载力呈下降趋势最明显,下降幅度达52.61%,但建设用地的生态承载力上升幅度达27.08%。(2)滇池流域生态承载力与三大系统要素相关性较好,其耦合形态呈"J"、"L"型、"U"型和倒置的"S"型等。(3)对耦合形态的形成机理进行分析,其结果表明:城镇化、社会经济的发展以及流域内粗放型的经济增长方式对形成这种耦合形态的影响较大。     

浙北山区土地利用与生态保护的冲突与协调机制研究冲突与协调机制研究——以天目山自然保护区为例

如何既注重生态环境的保护又满足区域经济、社会发展对土地利用的要求，成为当前我国不少地区土地利用中的一个重大课题。位于太湖流域和钱塘江流域源头的浙北天目山区，在土地利用与生态保护之间存在着多种矛盾。通过对浙北天目山地区生态保护与其他土地利用冲突及其协调的机理分析，试图寻找太湖流域上游山区生态保护与土地利用相协调的可选途径，探索自然保护区有效管护与当地经济发展、农民增收相结合的良性发展机制，并提出解决这些冲突的办法：修正保护目标，调整保护政策；建立合理的补偿机制；在不同的功能区施行不同的土地政策；把生态旅游作为解决土地利用冲突的突破口；探索社区共管模式，力争在扩大社区参与的前提下，实现保护区资源的可持续利用。     

江西省生态文明建设的系统仿真与优化

区域生态文明建设是以社会—经济—资源—环境为核心的动态复合巨系统。运用系统动力学的理论与方法,系统分析江西省生态文明建设诸要素间的相互作用,构建江西省生态文明建设系统动力学模型,以历史数据为基础进行仿真检验,证明模型结构、行为与实际状况是一致的。模拟维持现状、经济优先、资源环境优先和协调发展等4种方案条件下,2011~2030年间江西省生态文明建设发展现状及其演变趋势,并对系统仿真方案进行优化分析,结果表明:到2030年,在协调发展模式下,其能源供需平衡指数为–0.113,环境污染程度为0.083,既使社会经济高效发展,又促进资源集约利用、生态环境友好,是江西省生态文明建设发展的较优方案。研究为江西省开展生态文明先行示范区建设提供决策参考。     

可持续发展水利的生态学分析

生态学的整体、平衡和协调、竞争共生、循环再生等原理为可持续发展水利提供了生态学理论依据。我国治水思路的发晨过程人与自然平衡”的生态适应过程。本文阐明了可持续发展水利的生态学内涵，提出承资源和水环境承栽能力研究是可持续发展水利要解决的两个关键问题。基于 生态学理论中人与自然协调发展的理念，提出可行的保障可持续发展水利实施的生态学措施。     

Eco-environmental Impact Assessment of the Change of Regional Industrial Structure and Regulative Measures

Abstract

Acting as an important driving force for the change of the regional land use, the change of industrial structure also has some influences on the ecological environment. The assessment and mechanism analysis of these influences will be beneficial to the sustainable development of regional economy and the im­provement of relationships between man and earth. Taking Chuzhou City in Anhui Province as an example, on the basis of a qualitative analysis of the influence of the development of differ­ent industry on the regional ecological environment, this paper builds the influence factor of industrial structure on natural envi­ronment and the influence index of industrial structure on natural environment, makes a quantitative assessment of the change of the industrial structure and its comprehensive influences on the eco­logical environment in the Chuzhou City from 1974 to 1995. Studies show that, during the analysed period, Chuzhou City’s industrial structure has changed markedly, having undergone two transformations. The influence of industrial structure on natural environment from 1974 to 1995 increased as a whole, while from 1996 to 2004, the influence of industrial structure on natural en­vironment decreased year-on-year. These changes indicate that the regional change of industrial structure results in better ecological effects. Finally, we propose appropriate regulatory measures ac­cording to our research results.     

基于能值改进生态足迹的长株潭城市群可持续发展研究

为衡量和评价区域发展的可持续状况,针对传统生态足迹模型的不足,利用从系统论出发并具有基于流量算法优点的能值分析理论,建立基于能值改进的生态足迹模型,该模型增加了水消费、污染等生态足迹,用输入输出能值对生态足迹进行调整,同时生态承载力扩展为自然生态承载力、基于净初级生产力的生态承载力、生态服务价值承载力和人类劳务生态承载力等,并综合评价系统可持续发展度,充分考虑了城市生态系统的开放性,物质、能量、信息的流通性,以及人类作用的主观能动性等,较为全面地反映城市生态经济复合系统的结构、功能和发展的持续性。采用该模型计算了长株潭城市群2000～2008年人均生态足迹和生态承载力的演变,结果显示生态足迹不断增加,生态承载力波动发展,略有下降,而生态赤字增加明显,可持续发展评价指数高于05且趋近于1,城市群可持续性发展状况堪忧,采取必要的措施刻不容缓     

可持续发展与我国环境资源法保护对象的变革

本文从分析我国环境资源法保护对象发展变化的过程入手，提出了今后环境资源法应紧紧围绕生态环境及其承载能力作为更加明确具体的规定，以利于全社会加强对生态环境的保护，实现我国社会的可持续发展。     

人口、资源与环境协调发展关键问题之一——环境承载力研究

坏境承载力是人口、资源与环境协调发展研究的重要内容,是协调经济发展与环境保护的关键所在。本文试图从环境承载力的定义与表示方法入手,通过对发展变量与限制变量及其间的关系的描述,探讨承载力的内涵与研究方法;同时以福建省湄州湾新经济开发区为例进行分析,提出其规划建议,为该区人口、资源与环境协调发展提供科学依据。     

长江流域相对资源承载力与可持续发展研究

采用相对资源承载力的研究思路与计算方法，计算1988－1998年长江流域相对土地资源承载力、相对经济承载力和综合承载力及其变化过程。研究表明：（1）长江流域人口承载力从1988年到1998年一直处于超载状态，经济资源成为长江流域的主要承载资源；（2）相对资源承载力区域差异明显，上海、江苏2省市承载力一直处于富余状态，浙江从1993年起承载力处于富余状态；安徽、江西、湖南、湖北和川渝承载力一直处于超载状态；中上游地区自然资源是主要的承载资源，下游地区资源是主要的承载资源；（3）上游地区生态环境恶化，下游地区人地矛盾日益突出是长江流域可持续发展中存在的主要问题。