广东省高分辨率温室气体排放清单及特征

根据典型城市调查与统计数据收集得到的广东省活动水平数据,采用自上而下和自下而上相结合的排放因子法和GIS技术,建立了广东省2018年3 km×3 km高分辨率温室气体排放清单.估算范围包括能源活动、工业生产过程、农业活动、土地利用变化和林业、废弃物处理以及电力调入（出）间接排放等6大类CO₂、CH₄和N₂O这3种温室气体.结果表明,广东省2018年CO₂、CH₄和N₂O的排放量分别为8.5×10⁸、1.9×10⁶和1.1×10⁵ t,以CO₂当量计分别为8.5×10⁸、4.0×10⁷和3.4×10⁷ t,合计9.2×10⁸ t.CO₂是广东省主要的温室气体排放种类,占全省温室气体总排放量的92.0%,能源活动和电力调入（出）间接排放是广东省温室气体排放的主要部门,排放占比分别为77.9%和7.6%,合计占比为85.5%.从温室气体排放的空间分布情况来看,全省大部分地区温室气体表现为排放源,部分区域表现为汇;温室气体排放主要集中在珠三角地区,并呈现一定的沿路网和航道分布的特征;温室气体高排放网格主要为大型电厂、钢铁厂和水泥厂等高耗能企业所在地.     

季节性冻融期沼泽湿地CO2、CH4和N2O排放动态

三江平原季节性冻-融时间长达7～8个月,对沼泽湿地温室气体排放有重要影响.采用静态箱/气相色谱法研究了三江平原冻、融期沼泽湿地温室气体排放特征,表明三江平原不同类型沼泽湿地冬季都有明显的CH₄和CO₂排放,且冬季沼泽湿地CH₄排放量在全年CH₄排放中占有重要份额.融冻期沼泽湿地出现明显的CH₄和CO₂排放峰值,季节性积水沼泽化草甸CH₄和CO₂排放量大于常年积水沼泽湿地,而冬季常年积水沼泽湿地CH₄排放通量大于季节性积水沼泽化草甸.融冻期CO₂排放通量与土壤温度(5cm)呈指数相关关系(R²=0.912,p<0.001),沼泽湿地CO₂排放通量与CH₄通量间也呈显著正相关关系(R²=0.751,p<0.001).冬季三江平原沼泽湿地是N₂O的汇,融冻期随着土壤温度升高逐渐成为N₂O的源,且在5月份沼泽湿地表层土壤(0～20cm)融冻期间N₂O排放通量明显增大.三江平原土壤冻、融期间沼泽湿地温室气体的排放特征,反映了冬季微生物活性的存在及融冻作用对土壤碳矿化和氮硝化、反硝化作用有重要影响.     

凋落物添加和去除处理对三江平原小叶章湿地生长季温室气体排放的影响

为了解三江平原小叶章湿地温室气体排放对凋落物处理的响应,利用黑龙江省科学院自然与生态研究所三江平原湿地生态定位研究站内的试验平台,采用静态箱-气相色谱法,分别对去除当年凋落物（NL）、去除当年凋落物和草炭层（NL+NH）、添加当年凋落物（DL）、添加当年凋落物和草炭层（DL+DH）以及空白对照（CK）等5个处理的小叶章湿地进行了生长季温室气体排放通量观测,并同步观测相关环境因子.结果表明：（DL+DH、DL）处理分别使CO₂排放通量增加了21.23%和10.86%;使生长季CH₄排放通量增加了21.37%和9.81%;使N₂O排放通量增加了29.62%和12.76%.（NL+NH、NL）处理分别使CO₂排放通量降低了16.13%和9.41%;使CH₄排放通量增加了65.67%和45.92%;使N₂O排放通量降低了14.36%和16.92%.添加和去除凋落物均未改变CO₂、CH₄和N₂O排放的季节动态.CO₂排放通量与土壤温度出现了显著正相关关系,CH₄和N₂O排放通量未与土壤温度出现显著相关关系.CO₂、CH₄和N₂O排放通量均未与土壤含水量出现显著相关关系.     

铁碳微电解填料对人工湿地温室气体排放的影响

随着全球气候变暖的问题日益严重,人工湿地中温室气体的减排措施也受到越来越多的关注.铁碳微电解填料对废水处理效果良好且具备温室气体减排的潜力,为探究铁碳微电解对间歇曝气人工湿地温室气体排放的影响,本研究构建了以铁碳微电解填料+砾石（湿地Ⅰ）、铁碳微电解填料+沸石（湿地Ⅱ）、沸石（湿地Ⅲ）以及砾石（湿地Ⅳ）为基质的4组人工湿地,并利用间歇曝气技术对湿地系统进行了增氧.结果表明,铁碳微电解填料显著提高了间歇曝气人工湿地的脱氮效果,且具备对人工湿地温室气体的减排作用.与湿地Ⅳ相比,湿地Ⅰ、Ⅱ和Ⅲ的CH₄排放通量分别平均降低了32.81%（P<0.05）、52.66%（P<0.05）和54.50%（P<0.05）,其中沸石对CH₄的减排效果较优,能显著降低曝气段和非曝气段人工湿地CH₄的排放.铁碳微电解填料明显减少了N₂O的排放,与湿地Ⅳ相比,湿地Ⅰ和Ⅱ分别实现N₂O减排30.29%~60.63%（P<0.05）和43.10%~73.87%（P<0.05）.各组湿地系统在典型周期内排放的CH₄和N₂O引起的综合GWP（以CO₂-eq计）分别为（85.21±6.48）、（49.24±3.52）、（127.97±11.44）和（137.13±11.45）g·m^-2,铁碳微电解填料与沸石的联合使用有效实现了人工湿地温室气体的减排.总体而言,湿地Ⅱ在间歇曝气的条件下对污水净化效果最好,温室气体的减排效果最佳.     

施用不同污泥堆肥品对土壤温室气体排放的影响

通过田间试验,分别施加两种不同的污泥堆肥品（A：含生物质炭堆肥品,B：不含生物质炭堆肥品）和不同施肥量,分析土壤CO₂、CH₄和N₂O动态变化特征和排放系数,研究施用污泥堆肥品对土壤温室气体排放的影响.结果表明,土壤CO₂和CH₄排放主要集中在生长期,生物质炭堆肥品低施用量能减少CO₂排放,而高施肥量增加CO₂排放.CH₄排放主要为负值,总体表现为土壤吸收CH₄,对照处理吸收量远高于其他处理（P<0.01）,A组处理CH₄吸收量随施肥量的增加而增加（P<0.05）.N₂O排放集中在发芽期和幼苗期,施肥量越高,排放量越大（P<0.01）.污泥堆肥品农用过程排放的温室气体主要是N₂O,施用A、B两种污泥堆肥品的土壤N₂O排放系数分别为1.02%~1.90%和1.28%~2.93%.生物质炭堆肥品具有显著的碳减排效果,其温室气体排放量比不含生物质炭堆肥品的土壤低19.49%~35.56%,且对于N₂O的减排效果较CH₄更为显著.     

冬季绿肥对黄土高原旱作春玉米农田土壤温室气体排放的影响

利用田间试验研究了冬季绿肥对旱作春玉米农田土壤温室气体排放的影响.试验设燕麦、小扁豆、燕麦与小扁豆混播和裸地休闲共4个处理,采用静态箱-气相色谱法对冬闲期和春玉米生长期间土壤温室气体（CO₂、N₂ O和CH₄）排放通量进行观测.结果表明,旱作春玉米-冬季绿肥种植系统土壤是CO₂、N₂ O的排放源和CH₄的吸收汇.与裸地休闲相比,燕麦和小扁豆在冬闲期对土壤CO₂累积排放量没有影响,但在春玉米生长期间导致土壤CO₂累积排放量分别增加了7.77%和25.7%（P<0.05）,混播导致冬闲期和春玉米生长期间土壤CO₂累积排放量分别增加了19.1%和14.5%（P<0.05）.种植燕麦后冬闲期和春玉米生长期间土壤N₂ O累积排放量较裸地休闲分别降低了11.6%和14.7%（P<0.05）,而小扁豆分别增加了31.9%和14.9%（P<0.05）;混播导致冬闲期土壤N₂ O累积排放量降低了19.2%（P<0.05）,但在春玉米生长期间差异不显著.与裸地休闲相比,燕麦、小扁豆和混播冬闲期土壤CH₄累积吸收量分别降低了37.9%、23.6%和29.6%（P<0.05）,春玉米生长期间分别降低了19.4%、33.5%和31.5%（P<0.05）,其中小扁豆和混播在冬闲期和春玉米生长期间差异均不显著.燕麦较裸地休闲在农田综合增温潜势（GWP）、春玉米产量和温室气体排放强度（GHGI）差异均不显著.小扁豆和混播显著提高了GWP,其中小扁豆显著高于混播.而与裸地休闲相比,小扁豆和混播分别提高了春玉米产量的20.3%和15.4%（P<0.05）,但对GHGI没有显著影响.综合考虑GWP、春玉米产量和GHGI,本地区冬闲期间将小扁豆和燕麦二者混播能增加春玉米产量的同时有效降低土壤温室气体排放强度.     

椰糠生物炭对热区双季稻田N2O和CH4排放的影响

基于稻菜轮作模式,选择海南双季稻田为对象进行氧化亚氮（N₂O）和甲烷（CH₄）排放的原位监测,探究椰糠生物炭对该系统稻田温室气体排放的影响.试验设当地常规施肥对照（CON）、氮肥配施20 t·hm^-2生物炭（B1）、氮肥配施40 t·hm^-2生物炭（B2）及不施氮对照（CK）4个处理,采用静态箱-气相色谱法监测整个水稻种植季稻田N₂O和CH₄排放,并估算增温潜势（GWP）和温室气体排放强度（GHGI）.结果表明,早稻季N₂O排放动态与土壤矿质氮含量密切相关,排放集中在水稻苗期与分蘖期施肥后,各处理早稻季N₂O累积排放量为0.18~0.76 kg·hm^-2,相较于CON处理,生物炭处理减排18%~43%,其中B2处理达显著水平;生物炭可能通过促进N₂O的还原减少早稻苗期N₂O排放;提高土壤硝态氮含量而增加了早稻分蘖期N₂O排放.晚稻季N₂O排放集中在抽穗期和成熟期,累积排放量为0.17~0.34 kg·hm^-2,B1处理减排37%,B2增加3%,差异均不显著.稻田CH₄排放高峰出现在早稻季后期与晚稻季前期.各处理早稻季CH₄累积排放量为3.11~14.87 kg·hm^-2,CK较CON处理增排39%,生物炭处理可能提高土壤通气性限制早稻季产CH₄能力,B1和B2处理分别较CON减排28%和71%;晚稻季CH₄累积排放量为53.1~146.3 kg·hm^-2,排放动态与NH₄⁺-N含量极显著正相关,CK和B1分别较CON处理增加52%和99%,B2处理显著增加176% CH₄排放.早稻季B1和B2处理较CON分别增产12.0%和14.3%,晚稻季分别增产7.6%和0.4%.由于晚稻季甲烷排放的增加,施用生物炭增加了双季稻田总增温潜势（GWP）,其中高量生物炭达显著水平;不同施用量生物炭对双季稻田温室气体排放强度（GHGI）无显著影响.椰糠生物炭在热区稻田温室气体减排方面的应用仍需进一步研究.     

城市河流CH4和N2O产生及排放研究进展

甲烷（CH₄）和氧化亚氮（N₂O）是备受关注的温室气体.近年来,城市河流已经成为不可忽视的CH₄和N₂O排放源,亟需予以关注.探究城市河流CH₄和N₂O产生及排放的时空特征、机制和影响因素对城市碳减排具有重要意义.通过梳理近20年国内外文献关于城市河流CH₄和N₂O溶存浓度与排放通量实测数据,总结了当前城市河流CH₄和N₂O排放的时空特征;估算得到2018年北京市城市河流的CH₄和N₂O排放量（以CO₂-eq计）分别为234.63 Gg和59.53 Gg,估算得到2018年上海市城市河流的CH₄和N₂O排放量（以CO₂-eq计）分别为159.86 Gg和260.24 Gg,表明城市河流是不容忽视的CH₄和N₂O排放源;整理了城市河流中CH₄和N₂O的产生/消耗过程与输入/输出过程;从河流内部理化性质、河流外部水文及植被条件、城市化进程的角度,分析了城市河流CH₄和N₂O产生与排放过程的主要影响因素;最后提出了城市河流CH₄和N₂O排放核算与减排的未来研究重点,为今后城市河流的温室气体减排提供理论支持.     

生物质炭与强还原处理对退化设施蔬菜地土壤温室气体排放的影响

生物质炭和土壤强还原处理（Reductive Soil Disinfestation, RSD）可以有效地修复退化设施蔬菜地土壤,但2种修复技术联用对土壤温室气体（CO₂、N₂O和CH₄）排放的影响研究报道较少.本研究采用室内培养实验,设置未修复土壤（CK）、生物质炭修复（BC）、RSD修复（RSD）和BC与RSD联合修复（BC+RSD）4个处理,35℃条件下培养15 d,研究BC与RSD单独以及联合修复对退化设施蔬菜地土壤温室气体排放和综合温室效应（Global Warming Potential, GWP）的影响.结果表明,与对照CK相比,BC处理土壤N₂O排放量显著下降了50.0%,但CO₂排放量和GWP均显著增加（p<0.05）;RSD和BC+RSD处理土壤CO₂、N₂O、CH₄排放量和GWP均大幅度增加.但与RSD处理相比,BC+RSD处理土壤N₂O排放量和GWP分别下降了71.0%和30.0%.相关分析表明,土壤CO₂、N₂O、CH₄排放量和GWP与可溶性有机碳（DOC）和铵态氮（NH₄⁺-N）显著正相关,与pH和硝态氮（NO₃^--N）显著负相关.可见,生物质炭可以减少退化设施蔬菜地RSD修复引起的GWP.     

中国油气系统甲烷逸散排放估算

为实现碳达峰碳中和目标,中国正致力于推动能源低碳化转型,这促进能源由煤炭向油气资源的转变.因此,中国石油和天然气系统（油气系统）的甲烷（CH₄）排放日益受到关注.逸散排放包括设备泄漏、排空和火炬燃烧,涉及油气资源的开发、生产、运输、储存和分配等过程.但目前油气系统CH₄逸散排放缺乏统一的核算方法,逸散排放量亦未被纳入国家温室气体清单统计之中.基于相关方法,评估了1980~2020年中国油气系统的CH₄逸散排放.结果表明,油气系统的CH₄逸散排放随着油气资源的生产和消费增长而快速增加,由1980年不足60万t增长至2020年的超过260万t.石油系统和天然气系统在2020年的CH₄逸散排放分别达到约60万t和200万t,是1980年的1.38倍和16.6倍.油气系统的CH₄逸散主要源于天然气生产、石油生产、天然气分配、天然气运输和储存,分别占总排放的41%、20%、18%和13%.天然气管道是主要的逸散设施.相比于常规油气资源开发,非常规油气资源开发的排放强度更高.研究完善了CH₄逸散排放清单,可为CH₄减排提供重要科学数据支持.     

Uncertainty in Agricultural CH<Subscript>4</Subscript> AND N<Subscript>2</Subscript>O Emissions from Finland – Possibilities to Increase Accuracy in Emission Estimates

According to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and Kyoto Protocol under it, industrial countries have to estimate their greenhouse gas emissions annually, and assess the uncertainties in these estimates. In Finland, agricultural methane (CH₄) and nitrous oxide (N_2O) emissions represent 7% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions, and globally the share is much higher. Agriculture is one of the most uncertain emission categories (representing over 20% of greenhouse gas inventory uncertainty in Finland), due to both high natural variability of the emission sources and poor knowledge of the emission-generating processes. In this paper, we present an uncertainty estimate of agricultural CH₄ and N₂O emissions from Finland in 2002. Uncertainties were estimated based on measurement data, literature and expert judgement, and total uncertainty in agriculture was calculated using Monte Carlo simulation. According to the calculations, agricultural CH₄ and N₂O emissions from Finland were 3.7 to 7.8 Tg carbon dioxide (CO₂) equivalents, 5.4 Tg being the mean value.Estimates of CH₄ emissions are more reliable than those of N₂O. N₂O from agricultural soils was the most uncertain emission category, and the uncertainty was not reduced by using available national measurement data of N₂O fluxes. Sensitivity study revealed that the uncertainty in total agricultural inventory could be 7% points lower, if more accurate emission estimation methods were used, including 1) improved data collection in area estimates of organic soils, 2) climate-specific methods for N₂O from agricultural soils as already presented in literature, and 3) more detailed CH₄ estimation methods for enteric fermentation which can be achieved by investigating national circumstances and digestible systems of animals in more detail.     

湿地甲烷释放研究进展

甲烷是一种重要的温室气体，近年来大气甲烷浓度显著增加，湿地甲烷释放量约占全球总释放量的２１％，因而是大气甲烷的主要来源之一。本文综述了湿地甲烷产生，释放和氧化过程以及影响因素，以便为国内湿地甲烷排放研究提供借鉴。     

Climate impact from peat utilisation in Sweden

The climate impact from the useof peat for energy production in Sweden hasbeen evaluated in terms of contribution toatmospheric radiative forcing. This wasdone by attempting to answer the question`What will be the climate impact if onewould use 1 m<sup>2</sup> of mire for peatextraction during 20 years?'. Two differentmethods of after-treatment were studied:afforestation and restoration of wetland.The climate impact from a peatland –wetland scenario and a peatland –forestation – bioenergy scenario wascompared to the climate impact from coal,natural gas and forest residues.Sensitivity analyses were performed toevaluate which parameters that areimportant to take into consideration inorder to minimize the climate impact frompeat utilisation. In a `multiple generationscenario' we investigate the climate impactif 1 Mega Joule (MJ) of energy is produced every yearfor 300 years from peat compared to otherenergy sources.The main conclusions from the study are:?The accumulated radiative forcing from the peatland – forestation – bioenergy scenario over a long time perspective (300 years) is estimated to be 1.35 mJ/m²/m² extraction area assuming a medium-high forest growth rate and medium original methane emissions from the virgin mire. This is below the corresponding values for coal 3.13 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area and natural gas, 1.71 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area, but higher than the value for forest residues, 0.42 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area. A `best-best-case' scenario, i.e. with high forest growth rate combined with high `avoided' methane (CH₄) emissions, will generate accumulated radiative forcing comparable to using forest residues for energy production. A `worst-worst-case' scenario, with low growth rate and low `avoided' CH₄ emissions, will generate radiative forcing somewhere in between natural gas and coal.?The accumulated radiative forcing from the peatland – wetland scenario over a 300-year perspective is estimated to be 0.73 –1.80 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area depending on the assumed carbon (C) uptake rates for the wetland and assuming a medium-high methane emissions from a restored wetland. The corresponding values for coal is 1.88 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area, for natural gas 1.06 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area and for forest residues 0.10 mJ/ m²/ m² extraction area. A `best-best-case' scenario (i.e. with high carbon dioxide CO<sub>2</sub>-uptake combined with high `avoided' CH₄ emissions and low methane emissions from the restored wetland) will generate accumulated radiative forcing that decreases and reaches zero after 240 years. A `worst-worst-case' (i.e. with low CO<sub>2</sub>-uptake combined with low `avoided' CH₄ emissions and high methane emissions from the restored wetland) will generate radiative forcing higher than coal over the entire time period.?The accumulated radiative forcing in the `multiple generations' – scenarios over a 300-year perspective producing 1 MJ/year is estimated to be 0.089 mJ/ m<sup>2</sup> for the scenario `Peat forestation – bioenergy', 0.097 mJ/ m² for the scenario `Peat wetland with high CO<sub>2</sub>-uptake' and 0.140 mJ/ m<sup>2</sup> for the scenario `Peat wetland with low CO₂-uptake'. Corresponding values for coal is 0.160 mJ/ m², for natural gas 0.083 mJ/ m² and for forest residues 0.015 mJ/ m². Using a longer time perspective than 300 years will result in lower accumulated radiative forcing from the scenario `Peat wetland with high CO₂-uptake'. This is due to the negative instantaneous forcing that occurs after 200 years for each added generation.?It is important to consider CH₄ emissions from the virgin mire when choosing mires for utilization. Low original methane emissions give significantly higher total climate impact than high original emissions do.?Afforestation on areas previously used for peat extraction should be performed in a way that gives a high forest growth rate, both for the extraction area and the surrounding area. A high forest growth rate gives lower climate impact than a low forest growth rate.?There are great uncertainties related to the data used for emissions and uptake of greenhouse gases in restored wetlands. The mechanisms affecting these emissions and uptake should be studied further.     

中国城镇污水处理厂温室气体排放时空分布特征

城镇污水处理厂由于运行过程中能够大量产生二氧化碳(CO_2)、甲烷(CH_4)和氧化亚氮(N_2O),而被视为重要的人为温室气体释放源.采用基于污染物削减量的排放因子法建立了2014年中国城镇污水处理厂温室气体(CO_2、CH_4和N_2O)排放清单,并分析温室气体排放的时空分布和影响因素.结果表明,2014年中国城镇污水处理厂温室气体排放总量(以CO_2-eq计)为7 348.60 Gg,CO_2、CH_4和N_2O排放量分别为6 054.57 Gg、27.47 Gg(769.08 Gg,以CO_2-eq计)和1.98 Gg(524.95 Gg,以CO_2-eq计);各省份间排放量差异明显,华东地区排放量较高,西北地区排放量较低,西藏几乎没有排放,2005~2014年这10年间中国通过城镇污水处理厂排放的温室气体总量增长了229.4%,CO_2、CH_4和N_2O的涨幅分别为217.9%、217.9%和520.3%;地区经济的发展水平和污水处理量与当地城镇污水厂温室气体释放量相关性最大,人均蛋白质供应量与城镇污水厂N_2O产生量密切相关.     

我国农田土壤的主要温室气体CO2、CH4和N2O排放研究

讨论土壤主要温室体ＣＯ２,ＣＨ４和Ｎ２Ｏ的排放过程,计算我国农田生态系统排放ＣＯ２、ＣＨ４和Ｎ２Ｏ的总量。１９９０年,中国地区ＣＯ２、ＣＨ４和Ｎ２Ｏ农田排放源强分别是２６０ＴｇＣＯ２,１７．５ＴｇＣｈ４和０．０９６ＴｇＮ,它们占我国相应这些气体排放量的８％,５０％和１０％,论述了温室气体浓度增加可能以农业产生的影响及应采取的控制对策。     

2009~2019年中国人为CH4排放量的估算及时空格局

以中国340个地级及以上城市为研究对象,采用自下而上的核算方法,针对农业活动、能源活动和废物处理3个一级CH₄排放源,核算2009年和2019年中国人为CH₄排放量并分析其时空格局.结果表明：2009年中国人为CH₄总排放40.71Tg,2019年为42.89Tg,CH₄排放总量在增加,排放强度和人均排放量基本保持不变.一级排放源中,农业活动、能源活动和废物处理在2009年的CH₄排放量分别为24.88Tg、12.06Tg和3.76Tg,农业活动为主要排放源,2019年三者排放量分别为16.99Tg、21.62Tg和4.28Tg,能源活动成为主要排放源;二级排放源中煤炭开采的CH₄排放最多;不同城市中各排放源的占比存在较大差异,淮安、扬州和南通农业活动排放最多,晋城、大同和太原能源活动排放最多,而北京、上海和广州以废物处理排放为主.城市人为CH₄排放存在显著的空间正相关,高排放—高聚集的城市数量减少,分布集中;低排放—低聚集的城市数量增加,分布重心向东部地区转移;局部城市空间关联类型呈现出较强的空间锁定效应和迁移惰性特征.CH₄排放强度与人均CH₄排放的区域总体差异较大;CH₄排放强度地区间Theil指数差异较大,而地区内差异较小;人均CH₄排放地区间与地区内的Theil指数差异均较小.     

基于多区域投入产出(MRIO)的中国区域居民消费碳足迹分析

近年来,居民消费活动和环境的关系逐渐受到关注,而与温室气体排放相关的研究更是其中的热点.因此,本文采用“居民消费碳足迹”概念来定义特定居民消费活动所导致的直接和间接温室气体排放的总和,主要包括CO2、CH4、N2O3种温室气体;构建了基于环境扩展的多区域投入产出(Multiregional input-output,MRIO)模型的碳足迹核算方法,并以2007年中国8个区域为例对其居民消费碳足迹的数量、构成、分布及转移进行了分析.结果显示,2007年全国居民消费碳足迹总量达到31.74亿t(以CO2当量计).此外,碳足迹还呈现出区域差异明显、间接排放大于直接排放、城乡差距过大等特征.人均碳足迹方面,发展水平较高的京津、东部沿海地区明显高于相对滞后的西北、西南区域.研究还对碳足迹的区域分布和转移进行了深入探讨.结果发现,东北、京津、西北和西南区域转移收支为负,表示这些区域为其他区域承担的排放大于其他区域为其承担的排放;剩余的北部沿海、东部沿海、南部沿海和中部区域情况则正好相反.这些结果对现阶段中国制定具体区域消费政策或分配碳减排责任等具有参考价值;本研究的方法论也适用于研究其他环境因子及足迹因子与居民消费的关系.     

典型炼化企业温室气体甲烷排放特征

温室气体排放是造成全球变暖和气候恶化的重要根源.甲烷是仅次于二氧化碳的温室气体组分.石油加工过程是潜在的甲烷排放源.本文以我国广西某炼化企业为样本,通过现场采样和离线分析的方法,识别出炼化企业潜在的甲烷排放源,核算了不同排放源的甲烷排放量,分析了炼化企业的甲烷排放特征.研究表明,甲烷是炼化企业排放废气中的重要成分;烟气、污水收集和处理系统、储罐和油品装卸过程等均是重要的甲烷排放源项,其中烟气和储罐对甲烷排放总量贡献占比超过70%;不同源项甲烷排放特征各异,油品装载过程产生废气甲烷浓度最高;污水处理过程废气的甲烷浓度主要受常减压装置污水影响;该炼化企业每万吨原油对应的甲烷排放速率估算值为72.6 kg.     

Making carbon sequestration a paying proposition

Atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂) has increased from a preindustrial concentration of about 280 ppm to about 367 ppm at present. The increase has closely followed the increase in CO₂ emissions from the use of fossil fuels. Global warming caused by increasing amounts of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere is the major environmental challenge for the 21st century. Reducing worldwide emissions of CO₂ requires multiple mitigation pathways, including reductions in energy consumption, more efficient use of available energy, the application of renewable energy sources, and sequestration. Sequestration is a major tool for managing carbon emissions. In a majority of cases CO₂ is viewed as waste to be disposed; however, with advanced technology, carbon sequestration can become a value-added proposition. There are a number of potential opportunities that render sequestration economically viable. In this study, we review these most economically promising opportunities and pathways of carbon sequestration, including reforestation, best agricultural production, housing and furniture, enhanced oil recovery, coalbed methane (CBM), and CO₂ hydrates. Many of these terrestrial and geological sequestration opportunities are expected to provide a direct economic benefit over that obtained by merely reducing the atmospheric CO₂ loading. Sequestration opportunities in 11 states of the Southeast and South Central United States are discussed. Among the most promising methods for the region include reforestation and CBM. The annual forest carbon sink in this region is estimated to be 76 Tg C/year, which would amount to an expenditure of $11.1–13.9 billion/year. Best management practices could enhance carbon sequestration by 53.9 Tg C/year, accounting for 9.3% of current total annual regional greenhouse gas emission in the next 20 years. Annual carbon storage in housing, furniture, and other wood products in 1998 was estimated to be 13.9 Tg C in the region. Other sequestration options, including the direct injection of CO₂ in deep saline aquifers, mineralization, and biomineralization, are not expected to lead to direct economic gain. More detailed studies are needed for assessing the ultimate changes to the environment and the associated indirect cost savings for carbon sequestration.