Goal and Scope
At all times animal as well as human excrements have been used as organic fertilizers. Disposing of municipal sewage sludge on arable farmland means saving mineral fertilizer to conserve the exhaustible resource phosphorus; one can consider this kind of recycling management as a contribution to a sustainable regional development. However, the use of sludge implies a significant release of pollutants. Hence, in Germany as well as internationally, this is a controversial issue and therefore it needs to be re-evaluated under consideration of regional circumstances.Methods
A material flow management framework is used to first analyse toxic, fertilizing and legal aspects of the ‘sludge metabolism’ in Schleswig-Holstein, including involved participants. Then, the treatment of waste water as well as potential and actual recycling of domestic sewage sludge are regionally compared. The study is based on a survey of the municipal waste water treatment plants which serve more than 10.000 people including population equivalence; these plants cover about 94% of the sewage sludge in Schleswig-Holstein.Results and Conclusions
After taking the phosphorus of manure into account, the modelled potentials of recycling on the scale of districts do not correspond with the actual use of sludge in agriculture. The disposal firms recycle the sludge where they can get the highest profit. By minimizing transaction costs, lager recycling distances can be compensated. The potential of phosphorus recycling is limited. The calculated state-wide amount is not more than 10% of the total phosphorus demand of the arable land, so the benefit is less important for the national economy. On the other hand, there is a significant discharge of pollutants mainly into the soil, where apart from copper and cadmium, the charge through sewage sludge is higher than through mineral fertilizer and manure. In addition, the risk of pollutants with endocrine disrupters is difficult to estimate.Outlook
In respect of the net ecological effects, thermal utilization of sewage sludge, e.g. in clinker works, coal-fired power stations or waste incineration plants, combined with previous or additional phosphorus recovery from cinder, meets the criteria of sustainable material flows more than its use on arable land. Even though these disposal options are still more expensive, law induced adjustment of the waste market and more strict land application regulations will reduce their price differences. This will make a middle-term change from the agricultural use to a thermal recycling of sewage sludge possible to avoid soil impacts and fulfil the requirements of a sustainable development. 相似文献Goal and Scope
The controversial issue of disposing municipal sewage sludge on arable farmland and growing demand on derived fuels could result in a total or partial abandoning of sludge recycling as fertiliser. Alternative disposal strategies like incineration will cause complex changes. A material flow management framework is used to determine the economic-organisational consequences for public authorities, farmers, rural contractors, disposal firms, and population in Schleswig-Holstein.Methods and Focus
The study is based upon network analysis, analysis of agricultural and wastewater statistics and interviews. After structuring the disposal process, transaction are used to derive costs of different disposal strategies. The purification technique of sewage plant and application of metal salts for precipitation affect the fertilising quality of sludge. Therefore, all plants are classified into 4 different technical groups with decreasing fertilising effect. Now, the amount of sludge and corresponding fertilising benefit is calculated both state wide and for typical farms. Finally costs of different disposal strategies are derived.Results
Referring to sewage plants sludge disposal in Schleswig-Holstein is characterised by a local structure since less than 10% of all 841 sewage plants produce almost the entire sludge where as many small plants especially in rural areas produce only little amounts. Usually enriched with lime, dewatered sludge fulfilling legal limits is used as organic fertilizer. The number of transactions indicates the costs.Discussion
To reduce transaction costs, disposal firms try to offer high quantities of sludge to a limited number of farmers. Due to purification technique, the fertilising effect of half the amount of total sludge is reduced. Compared to the total demand on phosphorous, sludge can only substitute up to 4% of phosphorous. Farmers can substitute up to 50% of mineral fertiliser and increase marginal income per hektare. Although changing disposal strategy to incineration would double economic costs, fee for wastewater would remain almost constant.Conclusions
Small wastewater plants, farmers and rural contractors would be particularly affected by ceasing sludge disposal. Small wastewater plants would have to invest in dewatering equipment, rural contractors would lose an important market segment and farmers (only a small percentage of all farmers uses sludge) would lose additional income. Changing waste management from sludge disposal with many involved parties to e.g. incineration would considerably reduce transaction costs for authorities. In case of partly changing waste management strategy, whereas sludge of small plants could be recycled, the authorities would still have to plan and control the disposal process even for small quantities of sludge. Transaction costs do not decrease proportionally to the decreasing amount of sewage sludge.Perspectives
Quality management systems initiated by disposal firms should increase the acceptance and prevent a ban of sludge recycling. Nevertheless, the waste market develops from material to energetic use of waste. Significant resources will be lost without a phosphorous recovering from sludge as well as from other organic waste. 相似文献The huge amounts of sewage sludge produced by municipal wastewater treatment plants induce major environmental and economical issues, calling for advanced disposal methods. Traditional methods for sewage sludge disposal increase greenhouse gas emissions and pollution. Moreover, biochar created from sewage sludge often cannot be used directly in soil applications due to elevated levels of heavy metals and other toxic compounds, which alter soil biota and earthworms. This has limited the application of sewage sludge-derived biochar as a fertilizer. Here, we review biomass and sewage sludge co-pyrolysis with a focus on the stabilization of heavy metals and toxicity reduction of the sludge-derived biochar. We observed that co-pyrolyzing sewage sludge with biomass materials reduced heavy metal concentrations and decreased the environmental risk of sludge-derived biochar by up to 93%. Biochar produced from sewage sludge and biomass co-pyrolysis could enhance the reproduction stimulation of soil biota by 20‒98%. Heavy metals immobilization and transformation are controlled by the co-feed material mixing ratio, pyrolysis temperature, and pyrolysis atmosphere.
相似文献