Very high concentrations of DDE and toxaphene residues in crocodiles from the Ord River, Western Australia: an investigation into possible endocrine disruption

Organochlorine pesticide concentrations, particularly those of the DDT family and of toxaphene, were measured by gas chromatography in samples of liver and body fat taken from Australian freshwater crocodiles Crocodylus johnstoni at three locations along the Ord River in Western Australia. The three sampling sites were the irrigation area, downstream of the irrigation area, and well upstream of the irrigation area; the last site serving as the control. DDT and toxaphene were applied in large and known quantities to cotton grown in the Ord Irrigation Area from 1964 to 1974. Thus the residues in the crocodile tissues are representative of the situation almost thirty years after the use of DDT and toxaphene ceased in the area. Very high concentrations of p,p'-DDE and toxaphene were found in the lipid-rich tissues that were examined. Livers and body fat from estuarine crocodiles Crocodylus porosus from the downstream site were also analysed. As p,p'-DDE and toxaphene are both known to be disruptive of endocrine systems, a range of blood parameters, including estradiol and testesterone concentrations, were also measured for all the animals studied. The ovaries and testes of the freshwater crocodiles were also examined histologically. There were no obvious effects on blood chemistry or gonad histology of the large burden of pesticides and their metabolites carried by exposed animals, although the limited number of samples and the variability of the breeding state of the animals examined may have masked possible effects. The isolation of the area, the accurately known applications of DDT and toxaphene, and the simplicity of the drainage system make the lower Ord River a unique natural laboratory for studying the long term breakdown and effects of pesticides applied in a tropical environment.     

Measurements of primary trace gases and NOY composition in Houston,Texas

Concentrations of CO, SO₂, NO, NO₂, and NO_Y were measured atop the University of Houston's Moody Tower supersite during the 2006 TexAQS-II Radical and Aerosol Measurement Project (TRAMP). The lowest concentrations of all primary and secondary species were observed in clean marine air in southerly flow. SO₂ concentrations were usually low, but increased dramatically in sporadic midday plumes advected from sources in the Houston Ship Channel (HSC), located NE of the site. Concentrations of CO and NO_x displayed large diurnal variations in keeping with their co-emission by mobile sources in the Houston Metropolitan Area (HMA). CO/NO_x emission ratios of 5.81 ± 0.94 were observed in the morning rush hour. Nighttime concentrations of NO_x (NO_x = NO + NO₂) and NO_Y (NO_Y = NO + NO₂ + NO₃ + HNO₃ + HONO + 21N₂O₅ + HO₂NO₂ + PANs + RONO₂ + p-NO₃^? + …) were highest in winds from the NNW-NE due to emission from mobile sources. Median ratios of NO_x/NO_Y were approximately 0.9 overnight, reflecting the persistence and/or generation of NO_Z (NO_Z = NO_Y ? NO_x) species in the nighttime Houston boundary layer, and approached unity in the morning rush hour. Daytime concentrations of NO_x and NO_Y were highest in winds from the HSC. NO_x/NO_Y ratios reached their minimum values (median ca 0.63) from 1300 to 1500 CST, near local solar noon, and air masses often retained enough NO_x to sustain additional O₃ formation farther downwind. HNO₃ and PANs comprised the dominant NO_Z species in the HMA, and on a median basis represented 17–20% and 12–15% of NO_Y, respectively, at midday. Concentrations of HNO₃, PANs, and NO_Z, and fractional contributions of these species to NO_Y, were at a maximum in NE flow, reflecting the source strength and reactivity of precursor emissions in the HSC. As a result, daytime O₃ concentrations were highest in air masses with HSC influence. Overall, our findings confirm the impact of the HSC as a dominant source region within the HMA. A comparison of total NO_Y measurements with the sum of measured NO_Y species (NO_Yi = NO_x + HNO₃ + PANs + HONO + p-NO₃^?) yielded excellent overall agreement during both day ([NO_Y](ppb) = ([NO_Yi](ppb)11.03 ± 0.16) ? 0.42; r² = 0.9933) and night ([NO_Y](ppb) = ([NO_Yi](ppb)11.01 ± 0.16) + 0.18; r² = 0.9975). A similar comparison between NO_Y–NO_x concentrations and the sum of NO_Zi (NO_Zi = HNO₃ + PANs + HONO + p-NO₃^?) yielded good overall agreement during the day ([NO_Z](ppb) = ([NO_Zi](ppb)11.01 ± 0.30) + 0.044 ppb; r² = 0.8527) and at night ([NO_Z](ppb) = ([NO_Zi](ppb)11.12 ± 0.69) + 0.16 ppb; r² = 0.6899). Median ratios of NO_Z/NO_Zi were near unity during daylight hours but increased to approximately 1.2 overnight, a difference of 0.15–0.50 ppb. Differences between NO_Z and NO_Zi rarely exceeded combined measurement uncertainties, and variations in NO_Z/NO_Zi ratios may have resulted solely from errors in conversion efficiencies of NO_Y species and changes in NO_Y composition. However, nighttime NO_Z/NO_Zi ratios and the magnitude of NO_Z ? NO_Zi differences were generally consistent with recent observations of ClNO₂ in the nocturnal Houston boundary layer.     

Highlights of the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants

As the time approaches for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to evaluate whether risks from electric utility trace substance emissions are of concern, attention is focused on research to clarify the many issues surrounding this topic. Accordingly, more than 230 representatives of industry, government, international research and academic institutions, equipment manufacturers, and engineering service firms attended the Second International Conference on Managing Hazardous Air Pollutants, which was held in Washington, D.C., on July 13–15,1993. Sponsored by the Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) in cooperation with the EPA, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), PowerGen, Coal Research Division of the International Energy Agency, and Canadian Electrical Association, the conference featured more than 50 presentations that both asked and answered questions about utility emission sources, the atmospheric fate of emitted substances, health and environmental studies, risk assessment, and control technologies. The diversity of the audience produced a stimulating exchange of findings, interpretations, and assessments of remaining uncertainties. This exchange provided valuable direction for ongoing research activities worldwide.