Social encapsulation of beetle parasites by Cape honeybee colonies (Apis mellifera capensis Esch.)

Worker honeybees (Apis mellifera capensis) encapsulate the small hive beetle (Aethina tumida), a nest parasite, in propolis (tree resin collected by the bees). The encapsulation process lasts 1-4 days and the bees have a sophisticated guarding strategy for limiting the escape of beetles during encapsulation. Some encapsulated beetles died (4.9%) and a few escaped (1.6%). Encapsulation has probably evolved because the small hive beetle cannot easily be killed by the bees due to its hard exoskeleton and defensive behaviour.     

Nestmate recognition for eggs in the honeybee (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Apis mellifera</Emphasis> L.)

Colony integrity is fundamental to social insects and is threatened by the reproduction of non-nestmates. Therefore, discrimination between eggs derived from nestmates and non-nestmates would constitute an adaptation to prevent exploitation of the entire cooperative group by unrelated individuals. The removal of nestmate and non-nestmate queen and worker-laid eggs was evaluated in honeybees using colonies of Apis mellifera capensis to test female and of A. m. scutellata to test male eggs. The data show that honeybees can distinguish between nestmate and non-nestmate eggs of both sexes. Moreover, non-nestmate female queen-laid eggs were removed significantly faster than nestmate female worker-laid eggs in A. m. capensis, indicating that nestmate recognition cues can override caste-specific ones. While the experimental manipulation accounts for 37.2% (A. m. scutellata) or 1.6% (A. m. capensis) of variance in relation to egg removal, nestmate recognition explains 33.3% for male eggs (A. m. scutellata) and 60.6% for female eggs (A. m. capensis), which is almost twice as high as the impact of caste (16.7% A. m. scutellata; 25% A. m. capensis). Our data show a stronger effect of nestmate recognition on egg removal in the honeybee, suggesting that cues other than caste-specific ones (viability/kin) can dominate egg removal behavior. In light of intraspecific social parasitism, preventing the reproduction of unrelated individuals (group selection) rather than preferring queens’ eggs (kin selection) appears to be the driving force behind the evolution of egg removal behavior in honeybees.     

Diel eclosion rhythm of a sublittoral population of the marine insect Pontomyia pacifica

Within the scope of studies on adaptation of insects to intertidal and sublittoral environments, correlations between the reproduction period of the short-lived chironomid Pontomyia pacifica Tokunaga and tidal conditions were examined at the only known Japanese location of this species in 1980. The larval habitat is situated, except for deeper tide pools in the lower midlittoral zone, mainly within the inner sublittoral zone, whose upper area is covered by Hypnea choroides, the dominating algae during the summer. The aerial adults emerge on the surface of the open sea and swarm there independent of the tidal situation above the submersed sublittoral habitat. Eclosion always started during dusk and all reproductive activities were ended within 2.5 h after sunset. The adaptation of P. pacifica (sublittoral habitat, diel eclosion after sunset with mass concentration of the adults on the water surface, no semilunar or lunar timing of the reproduction period and sinking egg masses) corresponds with those of the convergent marine chironomid Clunio balticus from Europe. On the basis of a few laboratory observations with P. pacifica and detailed experiments with C. balticus, it is supposed that the diel eclosion of P. pacifica is also controlled by an endogenous, circadian timing mechanism and the 24-h light-dark cycle as an environmental time cue.Communicated by O. Kinne, Oldendorf/Luhe