Communities of different plant diversity respond similarly to drought stress: experimental evidence from field non-weeded and greenhouse conditions

Accelerating rate of species loss has prompted researchers to study the role of species diversity in processes that control ecosystem functioning. Although negative impact of species loss has been documented, the evidence concerning its impact on ecosystem stability is still limited. Here, we studied the effects of declining species and functional diversity on plant community responses to drought in the field (open to weed colonization) and greenhouse conditions. Both species and functional diversity positively affected the average yields of field communities. However, this pattern was similar in both drought-stressed and control plots. No effect of diversity on community resistance, biomass recovery after drought and resilience was found because drought reduced biomass production similarly at each level of diversity by approximately 30?%. The use of dissimilarity (characterized by Euclidean distance) revealed higher variation under changing environments (drought-stressed vs. control) in more diverse communities compared to less species-rich assemblages. In the greenhouse experiment, the effect of species diversity affected community resistance, indicating that more diverse communities suffered more from drought than species-poor ones. We conclude that our study did not support the insurance hypothesis (stability properties of a community should increase with species richness) because species diversity had an equivocal effect on ecosystem resistance and resilience in an environment held under non-weeded practice, regardless of the positive relationship between sown species diversity and community biomass production. More species-rich communities were less resistant against drought-stressed conditions than species-poor ones grown in greenhouse conditions.     

Sperm-depleted males influence the reproductive behaviour of conspecifics

In many insect species, sperm-depleted males (SDMs, i.e. males that have exhausted their sperm after a given number of matings) remain sexually active and continue to mate females. Here, we investigated the behavioural modifications that occur in both sexes of the parasitoid Asobara tabida Nees (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), after matings by fertile males and sperm-depleted males. We show that (i) virgin females, mated females and females mated to a SDM exhibited different behaviours and that (ii) males responded differently to females depending on whether the females had previously mated with an SDM or not. Our findings demonstrate that SDM influenced the reproductive behaviour of both males and females, especially with regard to male responsiveness and female attractiveness. These findings are discussed in the context of adaptive behaviour and fitness maximization in both males and females.     

Exploring the risk information gap. Research into information supply and information demand of different parties concerned

The Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), a governmental research institute, provides information on environmental and health risks. The primary contractors’ information demands are served well. But the risk information available from the RIVM does not always correspond to the desires and requirements of other parties concerned. It became apparent that – to a certain extent – an information gap exists, arising from a difference between the institute’s information supply and the information demand of the different parties concerned.This explorative study focuses on the information demand and supply with regard to three different risks: flooding by rivers, air pollution and food related risks.For each risk, the information supply was determined by listing the available risk information in RIVM reports. In a second step, the information demand of the five different parties, as well as different channels of communication, were examined. The parties’ perceptions and requirements concerning risk information were identified in interviews and focus group discussions.The public, which in general appeared to be quite unfamiliar with the institute and its information sources, preferred risk information tailored to its personal circumstances. Policy makers mainly appreciated personal contacts in order to keep up to date on risk topics, whereas NGOs and fellow researchers judged the institute’s website and reports to be more relevant. Press releases appeared to add little to satisfying the information demand of the media.