Determination of arsenic in crude petroleum and liquid hydrocarbons

Total arsenic was determined in crude petroleum and liquid hydrocarbons derived from crude petroleum by extraction with boiling water or boiling aqueous nitric acid (concentration 0.25 to 2.5 M), mineralization of the extracts with concentrated nitric/sulphuric acid, and reduction of the arsenate to arsine in a hydride generator. The arsine was flushed into a helium-DC plasma. The arsenic emission was monitored at 228.8 nm. The total arsenic concentration in 53 crude oil samples ranged from 0.04 to 514 mg L^–1 (median 0.84 mg L^–1). Arsenic was also determined in several refined liquid hydrocarbons and in a commercially available arsenic standard in an organic matrix (triphenylarsine in xylene). The method was checked with NIST 1634b Trace Elements in Residual Fuel Oil. The arsenic concentration found in this standard agreed with the certified value (0.12±0.2 g g^–1) within experimental error. Viscous hydrocarbons such as the fuel oil must be dissolved in xylene for the extraction to be successful. Hydride generation applied to an aqueous not-mineralized extract from an oil containing 1.67 g As mL^–1 revealed, that trimethylated arsenic (520 ng mL^–1) is the predominant arsenic species among the reducible and detectable arsenic compounds. Monomethylated arsenic (104 ng ml^–1), inorganic arsenic (23 ng mL^–1), and dimethylated arsenic (low ng mL^–1) were also detected. The sum of the concentrations of these arsenic species accounts for only 39% of the total arsenic in the sample.On leave from Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India     

Assessing reference conditions according to the European Water Framework Directive using modelling and analysis of historical data: an example from Randers Fjord,Denmark

The European Water Framework Directive (WFD) requires the definition of reference conditions, i.e. pristine conditions, for all surface waters. As the present state of Danish coastal waters cannot be referred to as pristine, reference conditions have to be assessed by analysis of historical data or by the use of models. Using Randers Fjord as an example, the aim of this work was i) to demonstrate possibilities and restrictions of assessing reference conditions by historical data and by modelling; and ii) to demonstrate how ecological conditions have changed along with eutrophication. The ample historical data from Randers Fjord allowed us to assess reference conditions with respect to benthic macrophytes and benthic fauna. Models of varying complexity enabled us to assess reference conditions for nutrients, chlorophyll a, Secchi depth, and eelgrass. We conclude that models can be a useful supplement to assess reference conditions, though they are presently restricted by the lack of quantitative links between eutrophication and species composition.     

Seventh International Congress of Ecology: Symposium on “Trace Metals in the Environment” Florenz, Juli 1998

Der VII. Internationale Kongre? für ?kologie ergab die M?glichkeit, auch einige Spezialisten aus der ?kologischen Spurenelementforschung in Florenz zusammenzubringen. Dabei zeigte sich deutlich, da? noch wesentliche Arbeit auf dem Weg zu einem generellen Verst?ndnis der Wirkung einzelner Elemente und ihrer Spezies vor uns liegt. Obwohl auf analytischem Sektor beachtliche Durchbrüche durch die Entwicklung leistungsf?higer Methoden bewerkstelligt wurden, bleiben noch wichtige Fragen zur essentiellen und/oder toxikologischen Wirkung einzelner Spurenelemente zu beantworten. Hieraus lassen sich aus den Beitr?gen der Teilnehmer des Symposiums folgende Forderungen ableiten:

Toxicity of boron to the duckweed,Spirodella polyrrhiza

Boron is an essential nutrient for plants and the potential exists for efficient removal of this element by wetland treatment systems due to accumulation by plants. To evaluate the efficacy of using Spirodella polyrrhiza to treat boron-contaminated wastewater or to be a suitable species for removing other nutrients from boron-containing wastewater the toxicity of this micronutrient was determined using standard methods. Frond production is apparently a more sensitive endpoint than either growth rate or the presence of abnormal fronds. Frond production in S. polyrrhiza was significantly reduced at 3.55 mg B/l. Significant reductions in growth rate and the percentage of abnormal (chlorotic, necrotic, and dead) fronds were observed at 18.9 and 22.4 mg B/l, respectively. The EC50 for frond production, frond growth rate, and abnormal fronds were 14.3, 11.7, and 17.7 mg B/l, respectively. S. polyrrhiza did not remove significant amounts of boron from the treatment solutions under the conditions and concentrations existing in this study. The inability of S. polyrrhiza to remove even small amounts of boron from the test solutions indicates this species is not suitable for treating boron-containing wastewater, even those with low boron concentrations.