Note--On the Timing of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions: A Final Rejoinder to the Symposium on "The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review and its Critics"

In this final rejoinder to the symposium on "The Economics ofClimate Change: The Stern Review and Its Critics," we respondto comments published in the last issue of this journal by RobertMendelsohn, Thomas Sterner and U. Martin Persson, and John P.Weyant (Mendelsohn et al. 2008). In particular, we examine thepoint of debate with arguably the greatest practical importancefor ongoing negotiations over an international agreement tosucceed the Kyoto Protocol: namely the appropriate timing ofglobal reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. Too often in the past, this debate has been presented as onebetween the poles of "act now" and "wait-and-see". Weyant (seeWeyant's     

The use of recreation planning tools in U.S. Forest Service NEPA assessments

U.S. Forest Service managers are required to incorporate social and biophysical science information in planning and environmental analysis. The use of science is mandated by the National Environmental Policy Act, the National Forest Management Act, and U.S. Forest Service planning rules. Despite the agency’s emphasis on ‘science-based’ decision-making, little is known about how science is actually used in recreation planning and management. This study investigated the perceptions of Forest Service interdisciplinary (ID) team leaders for 106 NEPA projects dealing with recreation and travel management between 2005 and 2008. Our survey data show how managers rate the importance of social and biophysical science compared to other potential ‘success factors’ in NEPA assessments. We also explore how team leaders value and use multi-disciplinary tools for recreation-related assessments. Results suggest that managers employ a variety of recreation planning tools in NEPA projects, but there appears to be no common understanding or approach for how or when these tools are incorporated. The Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) was the most frequently used planning tool, but the Visitor Experience and Resource Protection (VERP) framework was the most consistently valued tool by those who used it. We recommend further evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of each planning tool and future development of procedures to select appropriate planning tools for use in recreation-related NEPA assessments.