Variation of particle number and mass concentration in various size ranges of ambient aerosols in Eastern Germany

There is an ongoing debate on the question which size fraction of particles in ambient air may be responsible for short-term responses of the respiratory system as observed in several epidemiological studies. However, the available data on ambient particle concentrations in various size ranges are not sufficient to answer this question.Therefore, on 180 days during the winter 1991/92 daily mean size distributions of ambient particles were determined in. Erfurt, a city in Eastern Germany. In the range 0.01–0.3 μm particles were classified by an electrical mobility analyzer and in the range 0.1–2.5 μm by an optical particle counter. From the derived size distributions, number and mass concentrations were calculated.The mean number concentration over this period of time was governed by particles smaller than 0.1 μm (72%), whereas the mean mass concentration was governed by particles in the size range 0.1–0.5 pm (83%). The contribution of particles larger than 0.5 μm to the overall number concentration was negligible and so was the contribution of particles smaller than 0.1 μm to the overall mass concentration. Furthermore, total number and mass concentrations in the range 0.01–2.5 μm were poorly correlated.The results suggest that particles larger than 2.5 μm (or even larger than 0.5 μm) are rare in the European urban environment so that the inhalation of these particles is probably not relevant for human health. Since particle number and mass concentrations can be considered poorly correlated variables, more insight into health-related aspects of particulate air pollution will be obtained by correlating respiratory responses with mass and number concentrations of ambient particles below 0.5 μm.     

Validating the enchytraeid reproduction test: organisation and results of an international ringtest

In this paper the experiences concerning the organisation and results of the enchytraeid reproduction test (ERT) ringtest are summarised (for details see J. R?mbke, T. Moser, Organisation and Performance of an International Ringtest for the Validation of the Enchytraeid Reproduction Test, vols. I and II. UBA-Texte 4/99, 1999, 150, 223 pp). The performance of this ringtest was in line with requirements published by OECD. It was sponsored by the German Federal Environmental Agency (Umweltbundesamt; UBA, Berlin). The UBA was also actively engaged (together with the European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra) in a scientific task force, which consisted of seven scientists experienced in terrestrial ecology and ecotoxicology. 29 institutions (mainly from universities and contract research laboratories) from 15 countries of Europe and North America participated actively in the ringtest. The co-ordinating laboratory centrally distributed the test chemicals, guidance papers and test organisms to all participants. In addition, several training courses were organised. Most participants performed two tests with the fungicide Carbendazim and two with 4-nitrophenol. For each chemical, one test was designed according to an ECx approach and the other according to an NOEC approach. Several aspects of the test protocol were modified based on the experiences gained during the ringtest. A major aspect of the project was the detailed statistical evaluation of the test results (for details see A. Weyers, J. R?mbke, T. Moser, T. Ratte, Results of and statistical implications from the enchytraeid reproduction ringtest, 2001, submitted), leading to recommendations for an optimised ecotoxicological test design. A total of 92 tests were performed according to the protocol which is among the highest number ever performed in a ringtest. About 72% met the validity criteria (control mortality < 20%, > 25 juveniles per 10 adults). The effects of the two test chemicals on enchytraeid reproduction were in the range expected from data in the literature on oligochaete toxicity. However, statistical evaluation of the data was sometimes difficult as a result of the high variability in the number of juveniles. This variability was caused by several reasons, including hormesis effects or lack of experience of some participants. Comparison of the data from the NOEC and ECx approaches pointed to a clear advantage in favour of the latter. In most cases EC10 values were lower than the NOEC values determined in the same test. For details see A. Weyers et al. (loc. cit.). Reproducibility of the test data and practicability of the ERT ringtest were of the same order of magnitude as other ringtests recently performed. As a result of the ringtest, the ERT draft guideline was significantly improved. The new version is currently being standardised by OECD, ISO and ASTM.     

Contribution of leaching of diazinon,parathion, tetrachlorvinphos and triazophos from glasshouse soils to their concentrations in water courses

Data on the adsorption and transformation rates of diazinon, parathion, tetrachlorvinphos and triazophos in soils were collected from a survey of the literature. As little information is available on their mobility, the adsorption of tetrachlorvinphos and triazophos on three soils was measured in a slurry experiment. Properties of diazinon were introduced into a computer model simulating glasshouse soil systems in a simplified way. The leaching of diazinon from the root zone was calculated to be zero. The properties of the other three organophosphates indicate that in similar computations leaching from the root zone would have been even lower.Samples from tile drains and water courses in areas with many glasshouses were analysed by gas-liquid chromatography. The concentration of the four organophosphate insecticides in almost all of the samples of water from tile drains was below the detectable limit. However in samples from the water courses, pesticide residues were found regularly, sometimes at fairly high concentrations. Thus contamination of water courses would seem to be produced not by leaching of pesticides through the soil but by other pathways.     

Simple nomenclature for chlorinated camphenes and dihydrocamphenes from which structural information can be directly deduced

The systematic nomenclature for chlorinated camphenes and dihydrocamphenes is rather complicated and confusing. Therefore, a simple structure-related nomenclature is proposed for these compounds, which is based on the same logic as was recently used for the chlorinated bornanes, bomenes and bornadienes. Although final IUPAC rules for the systematic nomenclature for camphenes and dihydrocamphenes have not yet been presented, the present nomenclature can be used for retrieving the correct conformation without the help of extensive tables or computer programmes, and vice versa. When the final IUPAC rules will be presented, the present nomenclature can easily be adjusted, if necessary