Application of the criteria for classification of existing chemicals as dangerous for the environment

The criteria for classification and labelling of substances as “dangerous for the environment” agreed upon within the European Union (EU) were applied to two sets of existing chemicals. One set (sample A) consisted of 41 randomly selected compounds listed in the European Inventory of Existing Chemical Substances (EINECS). The other set (sample B) comprised 115 substances listed in Annex I of Directive 67/548/EEC which were classified by the EU Working Group on Classification and Labelling of Existing Chemicals. The aquatic toxicity (fish mortality,Daphnia immobilisation, algal growth inhibition), ready biodegradability and n-octanol/water partition coefficient were measured for sample A by one and the same laboratory. For sample B, the available ecotoxicological data originated from many different sources and therefore was rather heterogeneous. In both samples, algal toxicity was the most sensitive effect parameter for most substances. Furthermore, it was found that, classification based on a single aquatic test result differs in many cases from classification based on a complete data set, although a correlation exists between the biological end-points of the aquatic toxicity test systems.     

Source Reduction and the Waste Management Hierarchy

Source reduction and the waste management hierarchy have become the subject of considerable controversy. This paper describes the two extreme positions on source reduction and places them in context in the debate on how to better manage waste. It uses case studies to illustrate that the polar positions are ideological and that such simplistic views lead to inaction. It argues for compromise positions and emphasizes that improved hazardous substances management will come about not through further debate but through implementing solutions on a case-by-case basis. Some measures may prove appropriate only for certain plants and operations; other measures may apply across an entire industry.     

Reduced biodegradation of benzonitrile in soil containing wheat-residue-derived ash

Burning of crop residues is a common agricultural practice that incorporates the resulting particulate matter (ash) of high adsorptivity into soils. To investigate the effect of ash on the biodegradation of pesticides in soils, we measured the sorption, desorption, and biodegradation of benzonitrile in a silt loam in the presence and absence of an ash resulting from burning of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) residue. Biodegradation experiments were conducted by inoculating sorbent slurries with a pure culture of benzonitrile-degrading bacteria (Nocardia sp.). Both liquid- and sorbed-phase benzonitrile concentrations were quantified over time. The ash was approximately 2000 times more effective per unit mass than the soil in sorbing benzonitrile. Amendment of the soil with 1% ash (by weight) resulted in a 10-fold increase in sorption. Sorption of benzonitrile by the ash significantly decreased the solution-phase concentration in the slurries of ash and ash-amended soil. Desorption of benzonitrile from the ash required approximately 60 min to complete, whereas approximately 20 min were required for desorption from the soil. Benzonitrile in the extracts of various sorbents and soil slurry was completely degraded within 500 min. However, the degradation was substantially reduced in the presence of the ash. At 2000 min, only 20% of benzonitrile in ash slurry and only 44% in ash-amended soil slurry were degraded. An acclimation period of approximately 100 min was observed in extracts and slurries containing the ash. Substantial reduction in the biodegradation of benzonitrile in the presence of wheat ash was apparently due to sorption of benzonitrile by the ash, slow desorption from the ash, and the increased acclimation period. Our results suggest that the presence of crop-residue-derived ash may increase the persistence of pesticides in agricultural soils.     

Foraging in groups of water striders (Gerris remigis): effects of variability in prey arrivals and handling times

Summary In many species, socially subordinate individuals frequently remain in a group despite their lower priority of access to food and mates. This is expected to occur when the net benefits of staying in the group exceed those of a solitary existence. Analogously, territorial foragers surrounded by conspecific competitors are faced with tradeoffs as to patch tenacity. In either case, spatio-temporal variability in resource availability directly affects behavioral patterns and payoffs, particularly of individuals with low priority of access to the resource. However, such individuals may take advantage of natural environmental fluctuations in resource supply in cases where dominants are preoccupied. This arises regularly if two resource items cannot be handled simultaneously and if a second item arrives before handling of the first has been completed. I advance a heuristic model that predicts that foraging or mating success of individuals with low priority of access to resources may increase both with higher variance in inter-arrival times of the resource (given the same mean) and with an increase in the average handling time of the resource. I tested both predictions with two associations of individually marked, naturally foraging water striders (Gerris remigis) in the field. In natural streams individual water striders tend to occupy consistent positions that they may defend, resulting in priority of access to prey items floating downstream for individuals further up front. I manipulated the variance in prey inter-arrival times given the same mean, and the prey handling times by offering larger prey. The outcome was in qualitative agreement with the predictions of the model.