首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   51篇
  免费   0篇
综合类   41篇
基础理论   3篇
污染及防治   4篇
社会与环境   3篇
  2021年   1篇
  2017年   1篇
  2016年   1篇
  2013年   1篇
  2010年   1篇
  2007年   1篇
  2001年   1篇
  2000年   1篇
  1996年   1篇
  1992年   1篇
  1990年   1篇
  1989年   1篇
  1986年   1篇
  1981年   3篇
  1980年   1篇
  1979年   1篇
  1978年   2篇
  1977年   2篇
  1976年   2篇
  1975年   4篇
  1973年   1篇
  1972年   3篇
  1971年   4篇
  1970年   1篇
  1969年   1篇
  1967年   5篇
  1966年   2篇
  1965年   2篇
  1963年   1篇
  1962年   2篇
  1960年   1篇
排序方式: 共有51条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
11.
The distribution of breeding resources, such as nest sites, can have a pronounced impact on a population by affecting the proportion of individuals that succeed to breed and hence, the variation in reproductive success. Aggregation of important resources can lead to resource monopolisation by a limited number of individuals and thus affect the intensity of sexual selection. In this study, we tested, by contrasting two experimental treatments (dispersed vs. aggregated), how nest distribution affects: (1) mating behaviour, (2) male nest occupation and mating success, and (3) reproductive success and the opportunity for selection. We used the two-spotted goby (Gobiusculus flavescens), a small marine fish with a resource-based mating system, as our model species. When nests were aggregated, a larger proportion of the males behaved aggressively, fewer males succeeded in occupying a nest, fewer males became mated, and those males that mated received fewer eggs from spawning females. These effects resulted in a higher variance in reproductive success and hence, a higher opportunity for selection (I rs ), in the aggregated treatment. We suggest that the results are a direct consequence of males defending a territory around their nest, preventing competitively inferior males from breeding. However, we found no significant selection differentials for body length or condition of males in either treatment. Our results support the hypothesis that aggregation of essential resources like nests promotes resource monopolisation. In species facing highly clumped nesting resources in the wild, monopolisation may negatively impact population productivity but could lead to strong selection on traits that promote male competitive ability.  相似文献   
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号