Large-scale risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in shoreline sediments from Saudi Arabia: Environmental legacy after twelve years of the Gulf war oil spill

A large-scale assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from the 1991 Gulf War oil spill was performed for 2002-2003 sediment samples (n = 1679) collected from habitats along the shoreline of Saudi Arabia. Benthic sediment toxicity was characterized using the Equilibrium Partitioning Sediment Benchmark Toxic Unit approach for 43 PAHs (ESBTU_FCV,43). Samples were assigned to risk categories according to ESBTU_FCV,43 values: no-risk (≤1), low (>1-≤2), low-medium (>2-≤3), medium (>3-≤5) and high-risk (>5). Sixty seven percent of samples had ESBTU_FCV,43 > 1 indicating potential adverse ecological effects. Sediments from the 0-30 cm layer from tidal flats, and the >30-<60 cm layer from heavily oiled halophytes and mangroves had high frequency of high-risk samples. No-risk samples were characterized by chrysene enrichment and depletion of lighter molecular weight PAHs, while high-risk samples showed little oil weathering and PAH patterns similar to 1993 samples. North of Safaniya sediments were not likely to pose adverse ecological effects contrary to sediments south of Tanaqib. Landscape and geomorphology has played a role on the distribution and persistence in sediments of oil from the Gulf War.     

Distribution in Portugal of some pollutants in the lichen Parmelia sulcata

During the months of July and August 1993 a lichen (Parmelia sulcata Taylor) collection campaign was held in Portugal where samples were obtained from olive tree bark at 228 sites, following a grid of 10 x 10 km along the Atlantic coast and 50 x 50 km in the interior of the country. The samples were analysed by instrumental neutron activation analysis and proton induced X-ray emission techniques. Concentration data patterns for the pollutants As, Cr, Hg, Ni, Pb, S, Sb, Se, and V were obtained for the whole country surface by making use of an extinction rule of 1/r(3), preventing any cut-off distance from being artificially introduced. Some pollution sources were identified: (1) oil-powered plants on the Lisbon-Setúbal axis (V, Ni), (2) coal-power plants in Porto and Sines (S, Se), (3) traffic in the northern area and the Lisbon-Setúbal axis (Pb), (4) a chemical industry south of Porto (Hg, As), and (5) soil influence (Cr, Sb). Arsenic and chromium results largely exceed, in a few areas, the concentrations acceptable to plants, and in a few spots also Hg, Ni, and Pb data.     

Ambivalence and conservation behaviour: An exploratory study on the recycling of metal cans

As resource conservation is an imperative for sustainable development, it is crucial to achieve a deeper understanding of the factors involved in people's decisions to recycle. This is even more so because the level of environmental concern is usually higher than the level of ecological behaviours. In this paper we take this fact as indicating that decision-making regarding conservation behaviours happens in the context of an internal debate where contradictory ideas are weighed up and the possibility of ambivalence arises. The main aim of this paper is therefore to explore how contradiction and ambivalence impact upon the attitudes, intentions and pro-ecological behaviours of the private sphere. The paper focuses specifically on the separation and deposition of metal cans, and compares the predictive capacity of beliefs, attitudes and intentions for two groups of respondents – one with a high and another with a low level of ambivalence, as assessed with a direct measure. The role of personal identity and the influence of structural constraints are also explored. Results demonstrate a clear moderating effect of experienced ambivalence, and show how beliefs, particularly negative ones, present a higher predictive capacity of the attitude in the high-ambivalence group, and personal identity plays a relevant role in predicting behaviour in both groups. We discuss the importance of pursuing the study of ambivalence when analysing decision-making in the conservation area.