Application of remote sensing for assessment of change in vegetation cover and the subsequent impact on climatic variables

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - The impacts of vegetation cover changes (VCCs) and land use land cover changes (LULCCs) on climate variabilities need to be addressed while...     

Current understanding of the influence of environmental factors on SARS-CoV-2 transmission,persistence, and infectivity

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a significant public health emergency in recent times. It is a respiratory illness caused by the...     

Roadmap to sustainable carbon-neutral energy and environment: can we cross the barrier of biomass productivity?

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - The total number of inhabitants on the Earth is estimated to cross a record number of 9 × 103 million by 2050 that present a unique challenge to...     

COVID-19 and increasing demand for medical oxygen: can impurity be a problem?

Environmental Science and Pollution Research -     

Fast removal of heavy metals from water and soil samples using magnetic Fe3O4 nanoparticles

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - Heavy metal discharge from anthropogenic sources on open soil surfaces and in natural water bodies poses serious environmental and health concerns. In...     

Graphitic carbon nitride: a sustainable photocatalyst for organic pollutant degradation and antibacterial applications

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - Recently, graphitic carbon nitride (GCN) has been found to be of great interest in various sustainable applications. In this study, a simple...     

How does cell-based non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) perform against chorionic villus sampling and cell-free NIPT in detecting trisomies and copy number variations? A clinical study from Denmark

Objectives

We aimed to compare cell-based NIPT (cbNIPT) to chorionic villus sampling (CVS) and to examine the test characteristics of cbNIPT in the first clinical validation study of cbNIPT compared to cell-free NIPT (cfNIPT).

Material and Methods

Study 1: Women (N = 92) who accepted CVS were recruited for cbNIPT (53 normal and 39 abnormal). Samples were analyzed with chromosomal microarray (CMA). Study 2: Women (N = 282) who accepted cfNIPT were recruited for cbNIPT. cfNIPT was analyzed using sequencing and cbNIPT by CMA.

Results

Study 1: cbNIPT detected all aberrations (32/32) found in CVS: trisomies 13, 18 and 21 (23/23), pathogenic copy number variations (CNVs) (6/6) and sex chromosome aberrations (3/3). cbNIPT detected 3/8 cases of mosaicism in the placenta. Study 2: cbNIPT detected all trisomies found with cfNIPT (6/6) and had no false positive (0/246). One of the three CNVs called by cbNIPT was confirmed by CVS but was undetected by cfNIPT, two were false positives. cbNIPT detected mosaicism in five samples, of which two were not detected by cfNIPT. cbNIPT failed in 7.8% compared to 2.8% in cfNIPT.

Conclusion

Circulating trophoblasts in the maternal circulation provide the potential of screening for aneuploidies and pathogenic CNVs covering the entire fetal genome.