全文获取类型
收费全文 | 118篇 |
免费 | 3篇 |
国内免费 | 1篇 |
专业分类
安全科学 | 7篇 |
废物处理 | 5篇 |
环保管理 | 15篇 |
综合类 | 20篇 |
基础理论 | 32篇 |
环境理论 | 1篇 |
污染及防治 | 34篇 |
评价与监测 | 7篇 |
社会与环境 | 1篇 |
出版年
2022年 | 4篇 |
2020年 | 4篇 |
2019年 | 3篇 |
2018年 | 1篇 |
2017年 | 6篇 |
2016年 | 1篇 |
2015年 | 2篇 |
2014年 | 2篇 |
2013年 | 5篇 |
2012年 | 4篇 |
2011年 | 4篇 |
2010年 | 4篇 |
2009年 | 6篇 |
2008年 | 4篇 |
2007年 | 8篇 |
2006年 | 7篇 |
2005年 | 6篇 |
2004年 | 4篇 |
2003年 | 4篇 |
2002年 | 4篇 |
2001年 | 3篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1998年 | 2篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 2篇 |
1995年 | 4篇 |
1994年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1992年 | 3篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 3篇 |
1989年 | 2篇 |
1988年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 2篇 |
1981年 | 2篇 |
1978年 | 1篇 |
1973年 | 2篇 |
1970年 | 1篇 |
1967年 | 1篇 |
1966年 | 1篇 |
1965年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有122条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
121.
Lekelia D. Jenkins 《Conservation biology》2022,36(3):e13855
The term conservation technology is applied widely and loosely to any technology connected to conservation. This overly broad understanding can lead to confusion around the actual mechanisms of conservation in a technological system, which can result in neglect and underdevelopment of the human dimensions of conservation technology. Ultimately, this hinders its effectiveness as technological fixes for conservation problems. Through a process of concept mapping based on key case studies and literature, I devised precise definitions of marine conservation technology and technological marine conservation system. Concerns about the use of marine conservation technologies included unintended consequences, halfway technologies that address the symptoms but not the causes of problems, and misguided techno-optimism (i.e., technology is a panacea that can solve any problem). Technology and technological systems can have power, politics, and culture, and these characteristics can influence the contextual fit of a technology, requiring that technology be thoughtfully created or adapted to the circumstances in which it will be used. Power, politics, and culture inherent in technology can also influence the distribution of conservation risks and benefits and potentially widen gaps in wealth, privilege, opportunities, and justice. Addressing these concerns can potentially be achieved through the better integration of social sciences in marine conservation technology and technological marine conservation system design and development and the application of the social-ecological-technological systems framework. This framework melds key concepts from the socioecological systems framework and science and technology studies. It recognizes as and elevates technology to be a central actor that can shape societies and the natural world. Such a framework incorporates broader understanding, so that the values and concerns of society are more effectively addressed in the creation and implementation of marine conservation technologies and technological marine conservation systems. 相似文献
122.
David W. Gibbons Chris Sandbrook William J. Sutherland Rezvin Akter Richard Bradbury Steven Broad Andy Clements Humphrey Q. P. Crick Joanna Elliott Ngawang Gyeltshen Melanie Heath Jonathan Hughes Richard K. B. Jenkins Alastair H. Jones Rocio Lopez de la Lama Nicholas B. W. Macfarlane Mike Maunder Ravikash Prasad Alfredo Romero-Muñoz Noa Steiner James Tremlett Rosie Trevelyan Savita Vijaykumar Irushinie Wedage Nancy Ockendon 《Conservation biology》2022,36(1):e13781
The COVID-19 pandemic has had an enormous impact on almost all aspects of human society and endeavor; the natural world and its conservation have not been spared. Through a process of expert consultation, we identified and categorized, into 19 themes and 70 subthemes, the ways in which biodiversity and its conservation have been or could be affected by the pandemic globally. Nearly 60% of the effects have been broadly negative. Subsequently, we created a compendium of all themes and subthemes, each with explanatory text, and in August 2020 a diverse group of experienced conservationists with expertise from across sectors and geographies assessed each subtheme for its likely impact on biodiversity conservation globally. The 9 subthemes ranked highest all have a negative impact. These were, in rank order, governments sidelining the environment during their economic recovery, reduced wildlife-based tourism income, increased habitat destruction, reduced government funding, increased plastic and other solid waste pollution, weakening of nature-friendly regulations and their enforcement, increased illegal harvest of wild animals, reduced philanthropy, and threats to survival of conservation organizations. In combination, these impacts present a worrying future of increased threats to biodiversity conservation but reduced capacity to counter them. The highest ranking positive impact, at 10, was the beneficial impact of wildlife-trade restrictions. More optimistically, among impacts ranked 11-20, 6 were positive and 4 were negative. We hope our assessment will draw attention to the impacts of the pandemic and, thus, improve the conservation community's ability to respond to such threats in the future. 相似文献