首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
文章检索
  按 检索   检索词:      
出版年份:   被引次数:   他引次数: 提示:输入*表示无穷大
  收费全文   98828篇
  免费   1578篇
  国内免费   2542篇
安全科学   4152篇
废物处理   3767篇
环保管理   14786篇
综合类   23788篇
基础理论   27519篇
环境理论   73篇
污染及防治   17862篇
评价与监测   5990篇
社会与环境   4311篇
灾害及防治   700篇
  2022年   1012篇
  2021年   1027篇
  2020年   856篇
  2019年   1047篇
  2018年   1430篇
  2017年   1456篇
  2016年   2439篇
  2015年   2045篇
  2014年   2876篇
  2013年   9659篇
  2012年   2800篇
  2011年   3226篇
  2010年   3671篇
  2009年   3821篇
  2008年   2769篇
  2007年   2626篇
  2006年   2832篇
  2005年   2708篇
  2004年   2892篇
  2003年   2823篇
  2002年   2277篇
  2001年   2690篇
  2000年   2276篇
  1999年   1662篇
  1998年   1460篇
  1997年   1441篇
  1996年   1576篇
  1995年   1641篇
  1994年   1524篇
  1993年   1373篇
  1992年   1377篇
  1991年   1314篇
  1990年   1286篇
  1989年   1230篇
  1988年   1054篇
  1987年   1006篇
  1986年   997篇
  1985年   1081篇
  1984年   1165篇
  1983年   1176篇
  1982年   1174篇
  1981年   1099篇
  1980年   954篇
  1979年   923篇
  1978年   826篇
  1977年   712篇
  1976年   639篇
  1975年   607篇
  1973年   631篇
  1972年   643篇
排序方式: 共有10000条查询结果,搜索用时 78 毫秒
21.
22.
RAMP I is a screening tool developed to support practitioners in screening for work-related musculoskeletal disorder risk factors related to manual handling. RAMP I, which is part of the RAMP tool, is based on research-based studies combined with expert group judgments. More than 80 practitioners participated in the development of RAMP I. The tool consists of dichotomous assessment items grouped into seven categories. Acceptable reliability was found for a majority of the assessment items for 15 practitioners who were given 1?h of training. The usability evaluation points to RAMP I being usable for screening for musculoskeletal disorder risk factors, i.e., usable for assessing risks, being usable as a decision base, having clear results and that the time needed for an assessment is acceptable. It is concluded that RAMP I is a usable tool for practitioners.  相似文献   
23.
Objectives: The accuracy of self-reported driving exposure has questioned the validity of using self-reported mileage to inform research questions. Studies examining the accuracy of self-reported driving exposure compared to objective measures find low validity, with drivers overestimating and underestimating driving distance. The aims of the current study were to (1) examine the discrepancy between self-reported annual mileage and driving exposure the following year and (2) investigate whether these differences depended on age and annual mileage.

Methods: Two estimates of drivers’ self-reported annual mileage collected during vehicle installation (obtained via prestudy questionnaires) and approximated annual mileage driven (based upon Global Positioning System data) were acquired from 3,323 participants who participated in the Strategic Highway Research Program 2 (SHRP2) Naturalistic Driving Study.

Results: A Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that there was a significant difference between self-reported and annual driving exposure during participation in SHRP 2, with the majority of self-reported responses overestimating annual mileage the following year, irrespective of whether an ordinal or ratio variable was examined. Over 15% of participants provided self-reported responses with over 100% deviation, which were exclusive to participants underestimating annual mileage. Further, deviations in reporting differed between participants who had low, medium, and high exposure, as well as between participants in different age groups.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that although self-reported annual mileage is heavily relied on for research, such estimates of driving distance may be an overestimate of current or future mileage and can influence the validity of prior research that has utilized estimates of driving exposure.  相似文献   

24.
25.
26.
27.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research - China is the most populous country in the world, and the pollution caused by the excessive population should not be underestimated. In recent years,...  相似文献   
28.
29.
Research suggests that encouraging motivated residents to reach out to others in their social network is an effective strategy for increasing the scale and speed of conservation action adoption. However, little is known about how to effectively encourage large numbers of residents to reach out to others about conservation causes. We examined the influence of normative and efficacy-based messaging at motivating residents to engage in and to encourage others to participate in native plant gardening in their community. To do so, we conducted a field experiment with messages on mailings and tracked native plant vouchers used. Efficacy messages tended to be more effective than normative messages at increasing residents’ willingness to reach out to others to encourage conservation action, as indicated by a several percentage point increase in native plant voucher use by residents’ friends and neighbors. Messages sometimes had different impacts on residents based on past behaviors and perceptions related to native plant gardening. Among these subgroups, efficacy and combined efficacy and norm messages most effectively encouraged individual and collective actions, as indicated by increased voucher usage. Our findings suggest that interventions that build residents’ efficacy for engaging in a conservation behavior and for reaching out to others may be a promising path forward for outreach. However, given our results were significant at a false discovery rate cutoff of 0.25 but not 0.05, more experimental trials are needed to determine the robustness of these trends.  相似文献   
30.
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号