Post-combustion CO2-capture from coal-fired power plants: Preliminary evaluation of an integrated chemical absorption process with piperazine-promoted potassium carbonate

The simulation tool ASPEN Plus^® is used to model the full CO₂-capture process for chemical absorption of CO₂ by piperazine-promoted potassium carbonate (K₂CO₃/PZ) and the subsequent CO₂-compression train. Sensitivity analysis of lean loading, desorber pressure and CO₂-capture rate are performed for various solvent compositions to evaluate the optimal process parameters. EbsilonProfessional^® is used to model a 600 MW_el (gross) hard coal-fired power plant. Numerical equations for power losses due to steam extraction for solvent regeneration are derived from simulation runs. The results of the simulation campaigns are used to find the process parameters that show the lowest specific power loss. Subsequently, absorber and desorber columns are dimensioned to evaluate investment costs for these main components of the CO₂-capture process. Regeneration heat duty, net efficiency losses and column investment costs are then compared to the reference case of CO₂-capture by monoethanolamine (MEA).CO₂-capture by piperazine-promoted potassium carbonate with subsequent CO₂-compression to 110 bar shows energetic advantages over the reference process which uses MEA. Additionally, investment costs for the main components in the CO₂-capture process (absorber and desorber columns) are lower due to the enhanced reaction kinetics of the investigated K₂CO₃/PZ solvent which leads to smaller component sizes.     

The effect of heating technologies on CO(2) and energy efficiency of Dutch greenhouse firms

This paper uses Data Envelopment Analysis to compute measures of the efficiency (relative to a frontier) in terms of the use of all inputs as well as for single inputs like CO(2) and energy for a sample of greenhouse firms in the Netherlands over the period 1991-1995. These efficiency measures are generated for different firms specialised in production of vegetables, flowers, and potplants and with different heating technologies. The empirical results indicate that firms use energy quite efficiently and are less efficient in terms of CO(2) emissions. Firms using conventional heating are overall less efficiently using energy and CO(2) than firms using more advanced heating technologies. Most differences in efficiency between firm types and firms using different heating technologies are statistically significant. Scale adjustments can provide an important contribution to further efficiency improvements.     

PCDD/F formation during thermal desorption of chlorobenzene contaminated soil

Environmental Science and Pollution Research - Unintentional formation of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/F) is observed and investigated during the thermal desorption in...