Lying down as a means of reducing fly harassment in red deer (Cervus elaphus)

Summary Resting time in red deer (Cervus elaphus) was shown to be more than twice as long on days when harassment by head flies (Hydrotaea irritans) was considered severe compared with days when fly harassment was estimated as low. Avoidance reactions in the deer decreased as soon as the deer reclined and became stabilized at a level corresponding to approximately 50% of the initial response frequency. The present observations do not give any clear indications as to whether it is the head flies per se or climatic factors that are the primary cause of reduced locomotory behaviour in the deer. It is concluded, however, that due to a causal relationship between the appearance of flies and certain types of weather, and because lying down has a relieving effect, inactivity may be an important part of the strategy used by red deer to cope with head fly harassment.     

Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration - learning from the Swiss experience

E-waste, a relatively recent addition to the waste stream in the form of discarded electronic and electric equipment, is getting increasing attention from policy makers as the quantity being generated is rising rapidly. One of the most promising policy options to address this issue is to extend the producers responsibility for their products beyond the point of sale, until end-of-product-life. This paper briefly introduces the concept of extended producer responsibility (EPR) and its applicability in the area of the end-of-life management of electronic and electrical equipment (EEE). It then examines the decade-long experience of Switzerland in using EPR to manage its e-waste, elaborating on the experience of the Swiss system in overcoming specific issues, and finally wrapping up with a synopsis of the lessons for policy makers. We consider each issue as an enquiry of questions confronting a policy maker and the choices that may present themselves. The five issues discussed are: (i) the challenges in getting an EPR based system started; (ii) securing financing to ensure a self-sustaining and smooth functioning system; (iii) organising a logistics network for the take back and collection of the e-waste; (iv) ensuring compliance of the various actors involved; and finally (v) reducing the threat of monopolistic practices.     

Prevention or cure? Optimal abatement mix

Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - We develop a model for pollution abatement that distinguishes between prevention and treatment technologies, in order to better understand the optimal...