Fluorocarbons in the Los Angeles Basin

Ambient air concentrations of fluorocarbon 11 (fluorotrichloromethane) and fluoro-carbon 12 (dichlorodifluoromethane) have been measured using a gas chro-matograph equipped with a pulsed, electron capture detector. Air samples taken on a moderately smoggy day in July 1970, at several locations near Los Angeles gave average readings of fluorocarbon 12, 0.7 ppb and fluorocarbon 11, 0.56 ppb. These readings were contrasted with those taken in early February 1973 when the air was clear and marked with turbulence due to several seasonal rain storms. The readings of both fluorocarbon 1 1 and 12 averaged about 25% less during clear weather than those taken during moderate smog. The effects of weather conditions on the concentration were also dramatically pointed out by the February samples, in that as much as a tenfold change in concentrations of both fluorocarbons from location to location and from day to day at the same location was observed. A concentration versus altitude study clearly revealed that fluorocarbons are trapped by an inversion layer. Examination of air samples taken in the vicinity of factories known to be users of fairly large quantities of fluorocarbons revealed in part how large users contribute to the atmospheric concentrations of fluorocarbons. A comparison of fluorocarbon levels in homes and public buildings with ambient outside air levels revealed that the concentrations in some homes and buildings may be as much as several thousand times as high as levels in outside air. Inside the homes and public buildings, levels were as high as one-half of a part per million. Long term photolysis studies in simulated sunlight of both fluorocarbons 11 and 12 in ambient air samples and in air samples with 1 ppm of hydrocarbon and 1 ppm of nitrogen oxides revealed that the two fluorocarbons are photochemically stable even when photolyzed for several weeks.     

Culling recolonizing mesopredators increases livestock losses: Evidence from the South African Karoo

Populations of adaptable mesopredators are expanding globally where passive rewilding and natural recolonization are taking place, increasing the risk of conflict with remaining livestock farmers. We analysed data from two social surveys of farmers in the Karoo, South Africa, where black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) and caracals (Caracal caracal) have re-emerged as a threat to sheep farms in the context of falling agricultural employment and the expansion of natural areas. We show that irrespective of measurement approach, lethal control of mesopredators in this fragmented socio-economic landscape was associated with increased livestock losses the following year. Terrain ruggedness was positively, and number of farmworkers negatively, associated with livestock losses. Our study provides further evidence that lethal control of mesopredators in this context is probably counter-productive and supports calls to develop, share and financially support a range of non-lethal methods to protect livestock, especially where natural recolonization of mesopredators is occurring. A graphical abstract can be found in Electronic supplementary material.