Guide values for contaminated sites in Baden-Württemberg

The treatment of hazardous sites in Baden-Württemberg is based on three legal documents: the state waste disposal art (LAbfG, 1990), the assessment committee directive (KommissionsVO, 1990), and the guide values directive (UM & SM B-W, 1993). The guide values directive was commonly issued by the Ministry of Labor, Health and Social Affairs and the Ministry of the Environment of the state of Baden-Württemberg (UM & SM B-W, 1993) and contains a three-level hierarchy of numerical criteria and rules which serve as both screening levels during the investigation and as remediation objectives. The decision for the appropriate level of remediation is based on feasibility and environmental balance considerations. The levels are ordered as follows:

? Level 1 (Background-Values) On principle, all remediations have to be based first on background levels. In the case of lack of feasibility or negative environmental balance for level-1 objectives use-specific requirements are considered next.

? Level 2 (Assessment-Values for Worst Case Exposure Conditions) The generic requirements underlying level 2 afford appropriate protection for humans regarding the most sensitive uses of the environment. At least four resources are considered on this level: Ground-water as such and its use, the health of humans on contaminated sites, and soil with respect to growth and quality of plants. Barriers against migration of the contaminants, the effect of dilution, and abandonment of certain uses, etc., are not taken into consideration on level 2.

? Level 3 (Site-Specific Requirements) Lack of feasibility or a negative environmental balance of level-2 objectives lead to consideration of site-specific circumstances which may alleviate the requirements. With respect to groundwater, the distinction is again necessary between groundwater as a resource and the use of groundwater. On level 3 the guideline gives rules of how to derive site-specific remediation objectives for groundwater in the form of concentrations and fluxes of contaminants after taking into account barriers, dilution, and the abandonment of uses.

The guideline is the only directive of its kind in the world that regulates both concentrations and fluxes of contaminants into groundwater.     

Shoaling decisions in three-spined sticklebacks (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Gasterosteus aculeatus</Emphasis>)—familiarity,kinship and inbreeding

Shoaling with familiar kin is a well-known phenomenon. It has been described both for adult and for fry of three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus). However, evidence of preference for kin independent of familiarity is scarce. Furthermore, inbreeding effects have not been studied for shoaling preferences and there is a lack of studies about changes in individuals’ ability to recognise kin during different phases of life history. We gave inbred and outbred, nonreproductive sticklebacks of different age the choice to shoal with a group of familiar siblings vs unfamiliar non-siblings and with unfamiliar siblings vs unfamiliar non-siblings. Subadult sticklebacks preferred to shoal with familiar kin over unfamiliar non-kin, but inbred and outbred individuals had similar preferences. When given the choice between unfamiliar siblings and unfamiliar non-sibs, adult outbred fish preferred the shoal of kin, while inbred fish behaved indifferently. Body characteristics of the group such as body mass, standard length and condition of its members did not significantly explain the shoaling preferences for kin. Thus, sticklebacks were capable of recognising familiar and unfamiliar kin. The latter capability was lost by inbreeding.