Expositionsabschätzung: Human-Biomonitoring vs. Modellrechnungen

Exposure assessment represents an important and integral part of the assessment of health risks associated with the human exposure to toxic substances in soil and other environmental media. In recent times model calculations are widely used to assess the doses of toxic substances which have been incorporated into the human body via different routes of exposure. The present paper discusses the possibilities and limitations of such model calculations with regard to exposure and risk assessment. A critical point is that the results largely depend on the basic assumptions introduced into the model calculations. Moreover, the results refer to a more or less typical scenario of exposure, although they do not allow any conclusion with regard to individual exposure levels. In contrast, the use of biomarkers of exposure (human biological monitoring) represents a methodological approach to estimate individual exposure levels of subjects exposed to toxic substances in a given situation. In practice, the identification of persons at risk and the exclusion of individual health risks can only be based on human biological monitoring studies. Exposure assessment based on theoretical calculations and exposure assessment based on biomarkers of exposure and effects should be regarded as complementary approaches in exposure and risk assessment.     

The impact of differences in reliability data on the results of probabilistic safety analyses

The lack of plant-specific reliability data for probabilistic safety assessments is occasionally used for discrediting and doubting the validity of such analyses. On the other hand, analyses are often performed without even discussing the applicability of generic reliability data. In an attempt of clarification the impact of several sets of reliability data stemming from different sources on the explosion frequency of two processes with exothermal reactions (one of them is analyzed with plant-specific data) are quoted. As a further case study the reactor cooling system of one of the processes is analyzed. Additionally, a procedure using frequency and probability ranges is employed for comparison. The results show agreement within their respective uncertainty bounds; the identification of key components for safety is not hampered by data differences. The superiority of plant-specific data, which should of course be acquired, cannot be doubted. Nevertheless, improving the safety of a plant is possible using probabilistic safety analyses even with data which do not stem from the plant under investigation.     

Cell-to-cell communication in plants, animals, and fungi: a comparative review

Cell-to-cell communication is a prerequisite for differentiation and development in multicellular organisms. This communication has to be tightly regulated to ensure that cellular components such as organelles, macromolecules, hormones, or viruses leave the cell in a precisely organized way. During evolution, plants, animals, and fungi have developed similar ways of responding to this biological challenge. For example, in higher plants, plasmodesmata connect adjacent cells and allow communication to regulate differentiation and development. In animals, two main general structures that enable short- and long-range intercellular communication are known, namely gap junctions and tunneling nanotubes, respectively. Finally, filamentous fungi have also developed specialized structures called septal pores that allow intercellular communication via cytoplasmic flow. This review summarizes the underlying mechanisms for intercellular communication in these three eukaryotic groups and discusses its consequences for the regulation of differentiation and developmental processes.