Developing the Ethical Delphi

A number of EU institutions and government committees across Europe have expressed interest in developing methods and decision-support tools to facilitate consideration of the ethical dimensions of biotechnology assessment. As part of the work conducted in the EC supported project on ethical tools (Ethical Bio-TA Tools), a number of ethical frameworks with the potential to support the work of public policy decision-makers has been characterized and evaluated. One of these potential tools is the Delphi method. The Delphi method was originally developed to assess variables that are intangible and/or shrouded in uncertainty by drawing on the knowledge and abilities of a diverse group of experts through a form of anonymous and iterative consultation. The method has hitherto been used by a diversity of practitioners to explore issues such as technology assessment, environmental planning, and public health measures. From the original (classical) Delphi, a family of Delphi-related processes has emerged. As a result of the evaluation of the various Delphi processes, it is proposed that the classical method can be further developed and applied as a form of ethical framework to assist policy-makers. Through a series of exercises and trials, an Ethical Delphi has been developed as a potential approach for characterizing ethical issues raised by the use of novel biotechnologies. Advantages and disadvantages of the method are discussed. Further work is needed to develop the procedural aspects of the Ethical Delphi method and to test its use in different cultural contexts. However, utilizing an ethical framework of this type combines the advantages of a methodical approach to capture ethical aspects with the democratic virtues of transparency and openness to criticism. Ethical frameworks such as the Ethical Delphi should contribute to better understanding of and decision-making on issues that involve decisive ethical dimensions.     

A multi-step bioassay to assess the effect of the deltamethrin on the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi

Insecticides are widely used for crop protection. Effectiveness of pesticides and beneficial arthropods in an Integrated Pest Management (IPM) program requires a full understanding of how specific pesticides alter natural enemy effectiveness. This may require evaluation of chemicals at different life stages of the insect considered, on different physiological and behavioural components, and also on population dynamic components such as recolonization capacities after a pesticide treatment. Aphidius ervi Haliday (Hymenoptera: Braconidae) is an aphid parasitoid commonly used for the biological control of aphid populations. In this work, our aim was to assess the effects of deltamethrin (pyrethroid) treatments on this parasitoid using a multi-step bioassay. We evaluated its effects on parasitoid emergence, adult survival and longevity, and host searching. Two exposure methods were used, topical and spray, to evaluate impact of the deltamethrin field rate (6.25ga.i./ha) and also to compare the methods of exposure. A four-armed olfactometer was used to investigate effect of deltamethrin on host searching behaviour. When applied at the rate of field exposure, deltamethrin reduced the adult longevity but not the rate of emergence from mummies. Effects varied between the two exposure methods. Two indices were defined: the "population survival index" to measure capacity of parasitoids to recolonize a treated field and the "reproductive potential" to estimate the reduction in reproduction as a function of longevity decrease. These indices predicted effects of deltamethrin on A. ervi in terms of mortality and reduction of recolonization capacities. However, adults that survived residual exposure to deltamethrin retained their ability to orient to host odours. The implications of results in IPM and interest of the methodology used are both discussed.